search for: 1500c

Hi Patrick, 2010/11/15 Patrick O'Malley > I've confirmed that the CyberPower CP1350AVRLCD works with nut using > the USB port and the usbhid-ups driver. It is not on your list. > Thanks! > have you checked all variables, and most of all that shutdown works as expected? ie http://new.networkupstools.org/user-manual.html#Testing_shutdowns please also send us an upsc output.

...hanks. Also some dmesg output: [ 2388.220019] usb 5-2: new low-speed USB device number 2 using ohci_hcd [ 2388.394046] usb 5-2: New USB device found, idVendor=0764, idProduct=0501 [ 2388.394049] usb 5-2: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=1, SerialNumber=0 [ 2388.394052] usb 5-2: Product: CP 1500C [ 2388.394054] usb 5-2: Manufacturer: CPS [ 2388.461142] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid [ 2388.461147] usbhid: USB HID core driver [ 2388.508201] hid-generic 0003:0764:0501.0001: hiddev0,hidraw0: USB HID v1.10 Device [CPS CP 1500C] on usb-0000:00:13.3-2/input0 -- http://www...

...I run the driver with debugging enabled, it gives this: $ sudo /lib/nut/usbhid-ups -a cp1500 -D -D -D ... 0.135837 Checking device (0764/0501) (009/002) 0.158857 - VendorID: 0764 0.158870 - ProductID: 0501 0.158876 - Manufacturer: CPS 0.158882 - Product: CP 1500C 0.158887 - Serial Number: unknown 0.158891 - Bus: 009 0.158896 Trying to match device 0.158933 Device matches 0.166875 HID descriptor, method 1: (9 bytes) => 09 21 10 01 21 01 22 83 01 0.166892 HID descriptor, method 2: (9 bytes) => 09 21 10 01...

All, I just had a power failure that caused me a little drama. This spurred me into trying to get NUT up on my cyberpower 1500 again. For about 6 months I tried to get it to work with the new power panel drive with no luck. Today I removed all the old files for NUT and installed the newest version I could find (2.4.3) and it works perfectly now with my UPS. Hopefully now I

...#39; configurations under NUT 2.7.4 and 2.8.0. I attach these UPS to a typical PC USB power or to the USB ports of a Raspberry Pi 3 something; no apparent operational differences. Only the Powerware units have showed any quirky behavior, be being a bit slower to respond (compared to a Cyberpower CP 1500C or 1500D UPS, or even an APC Smart-UPS 1000) to NUT polling on a NUT server daemon 'start' or 'restart' compared to the Ellipse and Cyberpower units. I accept that Eaton Powerware quirky-ness by being more patient with those units. As for my NUT server experiences, I personally pre...

I was getting: "Can't claim USB device [0764:0501]: could not detach kernel driver from interface 0: Operation not permitted" so I manually installed the udev rules the source (I installed the Gentoo ebuild). I am now getting: # upsdrvctl start Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.3 Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.34 (2.4.3) USB communication driver 0.31 Using

..." "USB" "usbhid-ups" "Cyber Power Systems" "800AVR" "USB" "usbhid-ups" "Cyber Power Systems" "AE550" "USB" "usbhid-ups" +"Cyber Power Systems" "CP 1500C" "USB" "usbhid-ups" "Cyber Power Systems" "Value 400E" "USB" "usbhid-ups" "Cyber Power Systems" "Value 600E" "USB" "usbhid-ups" "Cyber Power Sy...

Oops... changing that to --with-user=nut solved one problem. I have the driver, upsd and upsmon running now. Thank you! Now I'm back to another issue, every 2 seconds I get in the logs: May 3 13:45:23 myhost upsd[2587]: Connected to UPS [eaton]: usbhid-ups-eaton It seems happy to do this forever. On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On

...41203 comparing with: Nova 600 AVR 6.041206 comparing with: Nova 625 AVR 6.041210 comparing with: Nova 1100 AVR 6.041213 comparing with: Nova 1250 AVR 6.041216 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 700C 6.041219 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 1000C 6.041223 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 1500C 6.041226 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 1500C CLA 6.041229 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 2200C 6.041233 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 3200C 6.041236 comparing with: Pulsar EX 700 RT 6.041239 comparing with: Pulsar EX 1000 RT 6.041242 comparing with: Pulsar EX 1500 RT 6.041246...

...11804 comparing with: Nova 600 AVR 8.211806 comparing with: Nova 625 AVR 8.211809 comparing with: Nova 1100 AVR 8.211811 comparing with: Nova 1250 AVR 8.211813 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 700C 8.211816 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 1000C 8.211818 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 1500C 8.211820 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 1500C CLA 8.211822 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 2200C 8.211825 comparing with: Pulsar EXtreme 3200C 8.211827 comparing with: Pulsar EX 700 RT 8.211829 comparing with: Pulsar EX 1000 RT 8.211831 comparing with: Pulsar EX 1500 RT 8.211834...

Guys, I've heard about some absurd RAM requirements for 9.1, has anybody tested it? e.g. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36314 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.