search for: 15.05

is there a way to use the actual index value for plotting zoo objects this is the way that the index is set up and a sample range of what I would like to plot 01/01/06 00:00:00 - 01/01/06 23:45:00 { library(zoo) # chron library(chron) fmt.chron <- function(x) { chron(sub(" .*", "", x), gsub(".* (.*)", "\\1:00", x)) }} x <- structure(c(15.57, 15.5,

I apologize that I've asked a similar question before, but being new to R I don't think I did a very good job of formating the question. I've included a text file since the date set is somewhat large. What I have is a huge string of numbers in a text file. The numbers are all separated by comma's and the groups are separated by a semicolon. What I would like to do is read each

Regards! During the use of areski a2billing software I'm getting same problem all the time. Actually, after 15 minutes of speaking to someone over calling card, connection brakes. Installation was as smooth as it could be so I don't think I made same kind of a mess in that domain. This is the only problem in the aplication. In the logs everything seems to be fine. I'am sending You

On 29 Jun 2018, at 15.05, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > On 2018-06-29 14:51, Timo Sirainen wrote: > >> v2.3.2 is mainly a bugfix release. It contains all the changes in >> v2.2.36, as well as a bunch of other fixes (mainly for v2.3-only >> bugs). Binary packages are already in https://repo.dovecot.org/ > > A simple "yum update"

Regards! During the use of areski a2billing software I'm getting same problem all the time. Actually, after 15 minutes of speaking to someone over calling card, connection brakes. Installation was as smooth as it could be so I don't think I made same kind of a mess in that domain. This is the only problem in the aplication. In the logs everything seems to be fine. I'am sending You

The current llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 2.6 branch passes all of the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks built with its gfortran. The results compare as follows... Compile Command : gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o %n benchmark gcc-4.2.4 llvm-gcc-svn llvm-gcc-2.6 llvm-gcc-2.6 at -m32 20081031 -m32 at -m32 at -m64 ac 18.30

On 29 Jun 2018, at 15.28, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: > > On 2018-06-29 15:20, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> On 29 Jun 2018, at 15.05, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >>> On 2018-06-29 14:51, Timo Sirainen wrote: >>>> v2.3.2 is mainly a bugfix release. It contains all the changes in >>>> v2.2.36, as well as a bunch of other

On 19/01/16 18:25, Maxim Vorontsov wrote: > Yazeed, your tun.ko for 3.3.8. Which kernel do you use? > Show your "uname -a". By the way, 3.3.8 seems very old for an OpenWrt kernel. The router I am running tinc on has 3.8.10 and is several years old. I built that image myself but it was based on Barrier Breaker r36499. You may want to find a more recent build -- for example a

On 03/10/2016 12:05 AM, Sarah Newman wrote: > On 03/09/2016 08:15 PM, Sarah Newman wrote: >> I've been running 3.18.25-18.el6.x86_64 + our build of xen 4.4.3-9 on one host for the last couple of weeks and have gotten several soft lockups >> within the last 24 hours. I am posting here first in case anyone else has experienced the same issue. >> > > Here is mpstat

SHA1 in LLVM is *very* naive, any improvement is welcome there! It think Amaury pointed it originally and he had an alternative implementation IIRC. — Mehdi > On Nov 16, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > By the way, while running benchmark, I found that our SHA1 function seems much slower than the one in gold. gold slowed down by

The current implementation was “copy/pasted” from somewhere (it was explicitly public domain). > On Nov 16, 2016, at 4:05 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > Can we just copy-and-paste optimized code from somewhere? > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > SHA1 in LLVM is

I've been running 3.18.25-18.el6.x86_64 + our build of xen 4.4.3-9 on one host for the last couple of weeks and have gotten several soft lockups within the last 24 hours. I am posting here first in case anyone else has experienced the same issue. Here is the first instance: sched: RT throttling activated NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [swapper/0:0] Modules linked in:

On 16 November 2016 at 15:52, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > I will do a quick benchmark run. On a mac pro (running linux) the results I got with all cores available: firefox master 7.146418217 patch 5.304271767 1.34729488437x faster firefox-gc master 7.316743822 patch 5.46436812 1.33899174824x faster chromium master 4.265597914 patch

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:16 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > Ralf, et al., > > > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > >

On 03/09/2016 08:15 PM, Sarah Newman wrote: > I've been running 3.18.25-18.el6.x86_64 + our build of xen 4.4.3-9 on one host for the last couple of weeks and have gotten several soft lockups > within the last 24 hours. I am posting here first in case anyone else has experienced the same issue. > Here is mpstat from around the time of the issue: 0:08:56 PM CPU %usr %nice

On 2018-06-29 15:20, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 29 Jun 2018, at 15.05, Tom Sommer <mail at tomsommer.dk> wrote: >> >> On 2018-06-29 14:51, Timo Sirainen wrote: >> >>> v2.3.2 is mainly a bugfix release. It contains all the changes in >>> v2.2.36, as well as a bunch of other fixes (mainly for v2.3-only >>> bugs). Binary packages are already in

Graham, 3.3.8 is OK for Attitude, although in 15.05 kernel version is 3.18.20. Yazeed, what happened with you kernel? Why 2.6.31 have status: Status: deinstall hold not-installed On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Graham Cobb <g+tinc at cobb.uk.net> wrote: > On 19/01/16 18:25, Maxim Vorontsov wrote: > > Yazeed, your tun.ko for 3.3.8. Which kernel do you use? > > Show your

Hi, I'm trying to setup IMC (idealx management console) to give our windows admins some nice toy to play with, but I have problem to make it work. I can log in after I authentificate as Administrator, but, I can't modify any LDAP entries, as that fails with unsufficient privileges due to the IMC trying to bind to LDAP as logged in user (Administrator), instead of something like

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Ralf, et al., > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > > additional benchmark results. > > > > First, these are preliminary

Hi Hemant, As I suspected, the code broke when I got to the line: result <- rfm_auto(df, id="user_id", payment ="subtotal_amount", date="created_at") Error in rfm_auto(df, id = "user_id", payment = "subtotal_amount", date = "cr eated_at") : could not find function "rfm_auto" It looks like you are using the hoxo-m/easyRFM