Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "13705efc".
2008 Jun 02
0
[LLVMdev] Plans considering first class structs and multiple return values
On Jun 2, 2008, at 8:45 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
>> Yes, the intention is that getresult will be removed once first-class
>> aggregates are a ready replacement. This won't leave LLVM missing the
>> concept of returning multiple values; a struct can be thought of as
>> a container for multiple values.
> I'm not saying we don't have some
2008 Jun 02
2
[LLVMdev] Plans considering first class structs and multiple return values
...umentpromotion first.
Thanks for your insights!
Matthijs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080602/13705efc/attachment.sig>
2008 Jun 02
2
[LLVMdev] Plans considering first class structs and multiple return values
Hi Dan,
> Yes, the intention is that getresult will be removed once first-class
> aggregates are a ready replacement. This won't leave LLVM missing the
> concept of returning multiple values; a struct can be thought of as
> a container for multiple values.
I'm not saying we don't have some way of modeling multiple return values, I'm
sayin the explicit concept