search for: 13636

Hello, Recently I found binaries produced with LLVM impossible to debug under Windows. This was probably related to the following bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13636 Asm generated from .ll files revealed that some offsets to debug information were incorrect: they were absolute instead of relative to their sections. Following patch seemed to have repaired the problem, so I'm just leaving it here. Hopefully this will help someone. Regards, Daniel diff...

...tests? On 26 October 2012 10:55, Daniel Kłobuszewski <daniel.klobuszewski at ibs.org.pl> wrote: > Hello, > > Recently I found binaries produced with LLVM impossible to debug under > Windows. This was probably related to the following bug: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13636 > > Asm generated from .ll files revealed that some offsets to debug information > were incorrect: they were absolute instead of relative to their sections. > > Following patch seemed to have repaired the problem, so I'm just leaving it > here. Hopefully this will help someone...

W dniu 2012-10-26 16:55, Daniel Kłobuszewski pisze: > Hello, > > Recently I found binaries produced with LLVM impossible to debug under > Windows. This was probably related to the following bug: > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13636 > > Asm generated from .ll files revealed that some offsets to debug > information were incorrect: they were absolute instead of relative to > their sections. > > Following patch seemed to have repaired the problem, so I'm just leaving > it here. Hopefully this will help so...

...8 18:31:09 computer1 pam_winbind[13565]: user 'adsuser' granted access Sep 28 18:31:09 computer1 sshd(pam_unix)[13582]: session opened for user adsuser by (uid=0) Sep 28 18:31:28 computer1 sshd(pam_unix)[13582]: session closed for user adsuser ......... Sep 28 18:32:07 computer1 pam_winbind[13636]: request failed, but PAM error 0! Sep 28 18:32:07 computer1 pam_winbind[13636]: internal module error (retval = 3, user = `localuser') .......... As you can see, the domain user has no trouble logging in, but the "localuser" is denied. This worked under 3.0.10. Also, the domain us...

...case alphabetic names > > > table(grepl("^[a-z]+$", row.names(a1))) > > > FALSE TRUE > > 7712 7038 > > > Packages with pure upper-case alphabetic names > > > table(grepl("^[A-Z]+$", row.names(a1))) > > > FALSE TRUE > > 13636 1114 > > > Package with at least one numeric digit in their name > > > table(grepl("[0-9]", row.names(a1))) > > > FALSE TRUE > > 14208 542 > > > It would be interesting to do an actual analysis of the changes in these > trends over time, bu...

Since the number of choices is small (6), how about this? Starting with Jeff's initial DFM: DFM <- structure(list(obs = 1:6, start = structure(c(16467, 14710, 13152, 13787, 15126, 12696), class = "Date"), end = structure(c(17167, 14975, 13636, 13879, 15340, 12753), class = "Date"), D = c(700, 265, 484, 92, 214, 57), bin = structure(c(6L, 3L, 5L, 1L, 3L, 1L), .Label = c("[0,100)", "[100,200)", "[200,300)", "[300,400)", "[400,500)", "[500,Inf)"), class = c("orde...

....180.nnn.nnn> Call-ID: 79620dc1382184b64681b2e85584ca4d@202.180.nnn.nnn CSeq: 102 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Max-Forwards: 69 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:00:04 GMT Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 338 v=0 o=root 13636 13636 IN IP4 202.180.nnn.nnn s=session c=IN IP4 202.180.nnn.nnn t=0 0 m=audio 36274 RTP/AVP 18 97 3 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:97 iLBC/8000 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=silenceSupp:o...

...} > ) > > # my result, provided using dput for precise representation > DFMresult <- structure(list(obs = 1:6, start = structure(c(16467, 14710, > 13152, 13787, 15126, 12696), class = "Date"), end = structure(c(17167, > 14975, 13636, 13879, 15340, 12753), class = "Date"), D = c(700, > 265, 484, 92, 214, 57), bin = structure(c(6L, 3L, 5L, 1L, 3L, > 1L), .Label = c("[0,100)", "[100,200)", "[200,300)", "[300,400)", > "[400,500)", "[500,Inf)"), class =...

I''m just wondering if someone is willing to check out a little tool I''ve been working on last 3 days after work called VersionCamp. It''s basic function is to transfer SVN changeset logs into BaseCamp as messages. It''s also meant to be a frontend for a Basecamp project. Displaying the changesets, milestones and tickets(Ticket adding not done). And also

...mes(a1), fixed=TRUE)) FALSE TRUE 14259 491 Packages with pure lower-case alphabetic names > table(grepl("^[a-z]+$", row.names(a1))) FALSE TRUE 7712 7038 Packages with pure upper-case alphabetic names > table(grepl("^[A-Z]+$", row.names(a1))) FALSE TRUE 13636 1114 Package with at least one numeric digit in their name > table(grepl("[0-9]", row.names(a1))) FALSE TRUE 14208 542 It would be interesting to do an actual analysis of the changes in these trends over time, but I Really should be working, so that will have to either wait...

Won't it be better to have a convention that allows lowercase, dash, underscore and dot as only valid characters for new package names and keep the ancient format validation scheme for older package names? This could be implemented by a single function, taking a strictNaming_b_1 parameter which defaults to true. Easy to use, and compliance results will vary according to the parameter value,

..., row.names(a1))) >> >> >> FALSE TRUE >> >> 7712 7038 >> >> >> Packages with pure upper-case alphabetic names >> >> > table(grepl("^[A-Z]+$", row.names(a1))) >> >> >> FALSE TRUE >> >> 13636 1114 >> >> >> Package with at least one numeric digit in their name >> >> > table(grepl("[0-9]", row.names(a1))) >> >> >> FALSE TRUE >> >> 14208 542 >> >> >> It would be interesting to do an actua...

...} ) # my result, provided using dput for precise representation DFMresult <- structure(list(obs = 1:6, start = structure(c(16467, 14710, 13152, 13787, 15126, 12696), class = "Date"), end = structure(c(17167, 14975, 13636, 13879, 15340, 12753), class = "Date"), D = c(700, 265, 484, 92, 214, 57), bin = structure(c(6L, 3L, 5L, 1L, 3L, 1L), .Label = c("[0,100)", "[100,200)", "[200,300)", "[300,400)", "[400,500)", "[500,Inf)"), class = c("ordered...

Dear Colleagues, I have a data set that looks as below. I'd like to count the number of dates in a series of arbitrary ranges (breaks) i.e. not pre-defined breaks such as months, quarters or years. table(format()) produces ideally formatted output, but table() does not appear to accept arbitrary ranges. I also tried converting the dates to numeric and using histogram to try to get the data,

Thank you all for the useful suggestion. I did some of my homework. library(data.table) DFM <- read.table(header=TRUE, text='obs start end 1 2/1/2015 1/1/2017 2 4/11/2010 1/1/2011 3 1/4/2006 5/3/2007 4 10/1/2007 1/1/2008 5 6/1/2011 1/1/2012 6 10/5/2004 12/1/2004',stringsAsFactors = FALSE) DFM DFM$D =as.numeric(difftime(as.Date(DFM$end,format="%m/%d/%Y"),

...uing at 6492 Match failed at index 6514 Continuing at 6545 Match failed at index 6562 Continuing at 6593 Match failed at index 6610 Continuing at 6641 Continuing at 6642 Match failed at index 6658 Continuing at 6772 Match failed at index 6788 Continuing at 6902 Continuing at 13636 Match failed at index 13640 Continuing at 14940 Match failed at index 14943 Continuing at 15415 Match failed at index 15417 Continuing at 15570 Match failed at index 15571 Continuing at 15598 Match failed at index 15599 Continuing at 15716 Match failed at index 15719 Continu...

...h failed at index 6610 >>>> Continuing at 6641 >>>> Continuing at 6642 >>>> Match failed at index 6658 >>>> Continuing at 6772 >>>> Match failed at index 6788 >>>> Continuing at 6902 >>>> Continuing at 13636 >>>> Match failed at index 13640 >>>> Continuing at 14940 >>>> Match failed at index 14943 >>>> Continuing at 15415 >>>> Match failed at index 15417 >>>> Continuing at 15570 >>>> Match failed at index...

...;>>>>>>>>>> Continuing at 6772 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Match failed at index 6788 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Continuing at 6902 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Continuing at 13636 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Match failed at index 13640 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Continuing at 14940 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Match failed at index 14943 >>>>>>>>>>>&g...

Have you read http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html and http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html ? http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMBackend.html#instruction-selector describes how to define a store instruction. -Eli On 7/6/2017 6:51 PM, hameeza ahmed via llvm-dev wrote: > Please correct me i m stuck at this point. > > On Jul 6, 2017 5:18 PM, "hameeza ahmed"

...uing at 6492 Match failed at index 6514 Continuing at 6545 Match failed at index 6562 Continuing at 6593 Match failed at index 6610 Continuing at 6641 Continuing at 6642 Match failed at index 6658 Continuing at 6772 Match failed at index 6788 Continuing at 6902 Continuing at 13636 Match failed at index 13640 Continuing at 14940 Match failed at index 14943 Continuing at 15415 Match failed at index 15417 Continuing at 15570 Match failed at index 15571 Continuing at 15598 Match failed at index 15599 Continuing at 15716 Match failed at index 15719 Continu...