Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "133001".
Did you mean:
13001
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...8-ret.ll 6 26849 0 0.01 26832 0 0.01 26832
d9-swtch.ll 4 31905 0 0.01 31888 0 0.01 31888
da-field.ll 9 70113 0 0.01 70096 0 0.02 70096
dbisect.ll 2 25498 0 0.01 25473 0 0.01 25473
db-meth.ll 8 72703 0 0.02 72686 0 0.02 72686
dc-misc.ll 7 26604 0 0.01 26587 0 0.01 26587
dct64_i386.ll 2 133032 0 0.02 133001 0 0.02 133001
dead_try_block.ll 2 2794 0 0.01 2775 0 0.01 2775
debugger.ll 19 116833 0 0.02 116803 0 0.02 116803
debug.ll 0 449 0 0.01 419 0 0.01 419
decode_i386.ll 2 40058 0 0.01 40027 0 0.01 40027
decode.ll 2 12247 0 0.01 12217 0 0.01 12217
decoder.ll 14 196940 0 0.03 196919 0 0.02 196919
decomp....