search for: 13001

Hi. I joined a fileserver system with Samba version 4.5.12-Debian (fileserv) in an Active Directory domain managed by a Samba 4.6.7-Ubuntu installed on another system using "realm discover" and sssd. The Samba fileserver is correctly joined into the domain and I can correctly browse AD users: root at fileserv:/# getent passwd my.user

...ail hasn?t changed at least since the last update in 16 March 2015 (sendmail 8.13.8-10.el5_11). Dovecot uses php-5.5.5 in this set up. The relevant entry in /var/log/maillog when I attempt to send an email from Dovecot is: May 5 16:34:29 firewall dovecot: auth: Debug: auth client connected (pid=13001) May 5 16:34:29 firewall dovecot: auth: Debug: client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=imap secured lip=127.0.0.1 rip=127.0.0.1 lport=143 rport=51861 resp=AGNocmlzADB1dFkwdUcwNDkh May 5 16:34:29 firewall dovecot: auth: Debug: pam(chris,127.0.0.1): lookup service=dovecot May 5 16:34:29 firewall dovecot:...

On 07/02/17 17:01, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 15:58 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> \ >> Next rid = 13001 >> krb5_init_context failed (Invalid argument) >> smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument) >> # >> >> Is this a CentOS 6/7 difference issue or is the classicupgrade broken >> for Samba Version >> 4.2.14-SerNet? Any help is appreciated. > &g...

...an issue. # samba-tool domain classicupgrade --debuglevel=3 --dbdir /var/lib/samba/bentley/ --use-xattrs=yes --realm=mrc.motec.com.au --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ /etc/samba/smb.bentley.conf Reading smb.conf lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters Initialising global parameters ... ---8<--- ... Next rid = 13001 krb5_init_context failed (Invalid argument) smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument) # Is this a CentOS 6/7 difference issue or is the classicupgrade broken for Samba Version 4.2.14-SerNet? Any help is appreciated. Kind regards, Tom -- Tom Robinson IT Manager/System Administrator...

...Robinson via samba wrote: > On 07/02/17 21:45, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > > On 07/02/17 17:01, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 15:58 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > \ > > > > Next rid = 13001 > > > > krb5_init_context failed (Invalid argument) > > > > smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument) > > > > # > > > > > > > > Is this a CentOS 6/7 difference issue or is the classicupgrade > > > > broken > &gt...

...73741487,The specified local group does not exist.) Ignoring group 'Replicators' S-1-5-32-552 listed but then not found: Unable to enumerate members for alias, (-1073741487,The specified local group does not exist.) Exporting users Skipping wellknown rid=500 (for username=root) Next rid = 13001 SIGSEGV only shows when I use strace: # strace samba-tool domain classicupgrade --verbose --debuglevel=0 --dbdir /var/lib/samba/bentley --use-xattrs=yes --realm=mrc.motec.com.au --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ /etc/samba/smb.bentley.conf 2>&1 | tee /tmp/out10 # grep -e Next -e open -e SIGSEGV /tm...

On 07/02/17 21:45, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 07/02/17 17:01, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 15:58 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> Hi, >>> \ >>> Next rid = 13001 >>> krb5_init_context failed (Invalid argument) >>> smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument) >>> # >>> >>> Is this a CentOS 6/7 difference issue or is the classicupgrade broken >>> for Samba Version >>> 4.2.14-SerNet? Any h...

...cal group does not exist.) > Ignoring group 'Replicators' S-1-5-32-552 listed but then not found: Unable to enumerate members for > alias, (-1073741487,The specified local group does not exist.) > Exporting users > Skipping wellknown rid=500 (for username=root) > Next rid = 13001 > > SIGSEGV only shows when I use strace: > > # strace samba-tool domain classicupgrade --verbose --debuglevel=0 --dbdir /var/lib/samba/bentley > --use-xattrs=yes --realm=mrc.motec.com.au --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ /etc/samba/smb.bentley.conf 2>&1 | > tee /tmp/out10 > >...

...a samba wrote: >> On 07/02/17 21:45, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> On 07/02/17 17:01, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 15:58 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> \ >>>>> Next rid = 13001 >>>>> krb5_init_context failed (Invalid argument) >>>>> smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument) >>>>> # >>>>> >>>>> Is this a CentOS 6/7 difference issue or is the classicupgrade >>>>> broken &gt...

Hi, I don't think that rid backend will work, because when we start samba (samab 2.2.8a) lower uid was 1000, but when we moved to samba 4, power uid was put to 10000. That's mean new user and group use uidNUmber or groupNUmber > 10000. But we have old account and group with uid or gid < 10000 regards Stéphane Purnelle "samba" <samba-bounces at

On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 10:00 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 12/02/17 03:13, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:34:23 +1100 > > Tom Robinson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > I've grabbed samba 4.5.4 and customised an existing rpm spec > > > file. > > > Still some issues there. > >

...1, SIGSEGV [default] siginfo: SIGSEGV SEGV_MAPERR addr=0x00000000 Greetings, Juergen -- Hochschulrechenzentrum der | Mail: Juergen.Obermann at hrz.uni-giessen.de Justus-Liebig-Universitaet | WWW: http://www.uni-giessen.de/obermann/ Heinrich-Buff-Ring 44 | Tel: 0641-99-13054 (0641-99-13001) D-35392 Giessen, Germany | Fax: 0641-99-13009

...- BASE_RID + LOW_RANGE_ID So if you have two users with the RIDs of 9999 & 10001, their UIDs would be this (note BASE_RID is 0 unless set in smb.conf), LOW_RANGE_ID would be set to 3000 UID = 9999 - 0 + 3000 Which would become: UID = 12999 UID = 10001 - 0 + 3000 Which would become: UID = 13001 These are just a couple of examples, from which I hope you can see, provide you set the LOW_RANGE_ID lower than your lowest RID, it should work, of course you will probably have to set the builtin range way above your workgroup range. Rowland -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the follo...

...- BASE_RID + LOW_RANGE_ID So if you have two users with the RIDs of 9999 & 10001, their UIDs would be this (note BASE_RID is 0 unless set in smb.conf), LOW_RANGE_ID would be set to 3000 UID = 9999 - 0 + 3000 Which would become: UID = 12999 UID = 10001 - 0 + 3000 Which would become: UID = 13001 These are just a couple of examples, from which I hope you can see, provide you set the LOW_RANGE_ID lower than your lowest RID, it should work, of course you will probably have to set the builtin range way above your workgroup range. Rowland

On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 15:58 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > Hi, > \ > Next rid = 13001 > krb5_init_context failed (Invalid argument) > smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument) > # > > Is this a CentOS 6/7 difference issue or is the classicupgrade broken > for Samba Version > 4.2.14-SerNet? Any help is appreciated. Remove the include lines from the...

...l solaris sendmail to use dovecots LDA instead of mail.local? Greetings, J?rgen Obermann -- Hochschulrechenzentrum der | Mail: Juergen.Obermann at hrz.uni-giessen.de Justus-Liebig-Universitaet | WWW: http://www.uni-giessen.de/obermann/ Heinrich-Buff-Ring 44 | Tel: 0641-99-13054 (0641-99-13001) D-35392 Giessen, Germany | Fax: 0641-99-13009 ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

...get the filesystem quota code working again under zfs and Solaris? Best whishes, J?rgen -- Hochschulrechenzentrum der | Mail: Juergen.Obermann at hrz.uni-giessen.de Justus-Liebig-Universitaet | WWW: http://www.uni-giessen.de/obermann/ Heinrich-Buff-Ring 44 | Tel: 0641-99-13054 (0641-99-13001) D-35392 Giessen, Germany | Fax: 0641-99-13009

...: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy: munakaya@naver.com <A>------<B>-------<C> 1.I put the nat entry into kernel in <B>. iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.177.3.51 -d 10.177.2.51 -p udp --sport 20000 --dport 13001 -j SNAT --to 10.177.2.34:20000 2. Sending packet from <A> to <C> 3. Watching the packet using tcpdump in <c>, and it works. 4. Now I want to stop nat function so I flush the nat table.(packet is still flowing and I am still watching the packet) iptables -F -t nat 5. Even...

...482.82 2,889 2.005% 7001 - 8000 7,500.97 2,323 1.612% 8001 - 9000 8,492.07 1,772 1.230% 9001 - 10000 9,542.60 1,736 1.205% 10001 - 11000 10,490.19 1,291 0.896% 11001 - 12000 11,516.00 1,104 0.766% 12001 - 13000 12,508.65 915 0.635% 13001 - 14000 13,501.24 869 0.603% 14001 - 15000 14,562.99 876 0.608% 15001 - 16000 15,502.50 650 0.451% 16001 - 17000 16,498.90 585 0.406% 17001 - 18000 17,511.23 573 0.398% 18001 - 19000 18,529.04 512 0.355% 19001 - 20000 19,605.73...

...apsam) Found pdb backend ldapsam pdb backend ldapsam:"ldaps://ldap.motec.com.au" has a valid init Opening cache file at /var/lib/samba/login_cache.tdb init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: user1 ---8<---*snip*---8<--- init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: lastuser Next rid = 13001 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. lpcfg_tls_verify_peer (lp_ctx=0x0) at default/lib/param/param_functions.c:355 355 FN_GLOBAL_INTEGER(tls_verify_peer, tls_verify_peer) (gdb) Any help appreciated. Kind regards, Tom -- Tom Robinson IT Manager/System Administrator MoTeC P...