search for: 130mb

...and I was able to reproduce it with his data with R-2.0.0 patched (2004-10-24) on WinXP Pro. The problem is that it crashes R on Windows. However, it does not happen on Linux (tried SUSE ES8 on our Opterons and Quantian on my laptop). On Linux, the memory usage for the R process goes up to about 130MB and stays there. On Windows, the memory usage would increase as the number of trees are grown (which already seem strange, as no more memory allocation is being done as the trees are grown), reaches about 130MB, then starts to decline, and eventually crashes the Rgui (or Rterm) process. My bigg...

Dear list, I need to read a big txt file (around 130Mb; 23800 rows and 49 columns) for downstream clustering analysis. I first used "Tumor <- read.table("Tumor.txt",header = TRUE,sep = "\t")" but it took a long time and failed. However, it had no problem if I just put data of 3 columns. Is there any way which can load...

...ISOs to ovirt.org while also working on getting an ovirt-node spin into Fedora, there is some debate over whether the version hosted on ovirt.org should use the minimizer kickstart or not. Main argument for including the minimizer kickstart: Size. We're currently looking at something around 130MB for the ISO with minimizer and probably around double that without it (I don't have one built currently without the minimizer so I don't have the actual size). Main argument for not using the minimizer: Consistently with the fedora spin. We can't use the minimizer in the Fedora spins...

...arch_each'' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/monitor.rb:238:in `synchronize'' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.11.4/lib/ferret/index.rb:380:in `search_each'' from test.rb:22 ..as well as segfaults sometimes. Any ideas? My index is about 130Mb, but I can try to make some test case if needed. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9783 Summary: please don't use client-server model for local copies Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All URL: http://lwn.net/Articles/400489/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

...h a vocabulary of some 350.000 words. Converting them from WAV to Speex obviously cut down the size a lot, but I find that some more compression could be done. Specifically I collect the resulting files in one big container file, and that one compresses quite well (from about 600MB to about 130MB). I expect that is due to redundant data in the headers and other OGG container artifacts (framing etc.). Any suggestions on how to proceed? Sincerely, Anders S. Johansen

...sed through to the "bare metal" OVM3.2.2, and the rest are managed through xen-pciback. I then install another OVM3.2.4 instance in an HVM with 1 vHBA passed through. Within the nested OVS (what OVM calls the VM hosts), I can configure access to disks - and I''m getting up to 130MB/s when I do a ''dd'' - on any of the LUNs (actually I get up to 130MB/s on the scst LUNs, and 50MB/s on the LIO-ORG, but they are different hardware). When I startup the nested PVM (since the HVM xen can''t run an HVM guest), Oracle Linux 6 gets as far as ''Detec...

Hello. I have a Solaris 11/11 x86 box (which I migrated from SolEx 11/10 a couple of weeks ago). Without no obvious reason (at least for me), after an uptime of 1 to 2 days (observed 3 times now) Solaris sets arc_no_grow to 1 and then never sets it back to 0. ARC is being shrunk to less than 1 GB -- needless to say that performance is terrible. There is not much load on this system. Memory

...opying is still faster than the checksumming by a quite large margin because of the sequential checksumming on source and target just doubles the time needed. I think the point is that the GigE link between the PC and the NAS achieves about 80MB/s, and the HDD read rate is not much higher (approx. 130MB/s). When doing the checksumming on source and target in parallel we could ideally (if nothing changed) reach the read rate of the HDDs as 'transfer' bandwidth, because this is the speed at which we can verify that the data is the same on source and target. The sequential approach like it...

...9;s program. Basically, we perform simulations. R is launched with high memory-limits. One execution of the program requires nearly 200 Mbs and is OK the first time. Then, launching it again does strange things: seen from Windows manager, the RAM used by R never exceed those 200 Mbs (often near 130Mb). seen from R: > gc(TRUE) Garbage collection 280 = 85+59+136 (level 2) ... 396784 cons cells free (40%) 145.7 Mbytes of heap free (53%) used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) Ncells 587240 15.7 984024 26.3 Vcells 16866491 128.7 35969653 274.5 And then each new call to the function...

Hi List Just had one of my servers fail serving web pages and apache produced a log file of nearly 1,000,000 lines and 130Mb in about 18 hours with the following: "SSL Library Error: -8181 Certificate has expired Unable to verify certificate 'Server-Cert'. Add "NSSEnforceValidCerts off" to nss.conf so the server can start until the problem can be resolved." repeated any where from 4 to 20...

...faulted to 1024! Want a little math? 8192/1024=8. ~2minutes*8=~15minutes. Lights flashed, clouds parted, angels sung, and somewhere, a PFY scored with a Super Model. We are now transfering at up to 67MB/minute at 10mbit, and with one to four systems on 100mbit, we are hitting the server with 130MB/minute each! That's roughly 69mbit (enhanced by compression) and if networking would light up a few more 10/100 ports to our lab, I bet we could add another system or two and still transfer at that speed. Needless to say, we are very happy with our samba server, and with this opensource v...

...d abort. By then, load average has hit 6-14 (depending on how many machines were transferring at once). Some systems can (individually) cause this overload. All the clients are using 100Mbps connections (some switched, some on hubs). No real pattern has emerged. Image files are broken up every 130mb right now, and no verification is done until the whole image is written. Transfers *from* the testbed use almost no CPU time, and the load average never gets much over 0.2, even with multiple clients. My only theory so far is that Samba is filling up the write cache/buffers faster than they can b...

On 2/27/2015 4:52 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote: > I understand; I tried it in the hope that, I could activate the LV again > with a new PV replacing the damaged one. But still I could not activate > it. > > What is the right way to recover the remaining PVs left? take a filing cabinet packed full of 10s of 1000s of files of 100s of pages each, with the index cards interleaved in the

Hello, I have an project running on a dedicated server: Debian, P4 CPU 3.00GHz, 1GB RAM, ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [x86_64-linux], rails (1.0.0), activerecord (1.13.2) lighttpd-1.4.10 + fastcgi + mysql 5.0 7 dispatchers. The project is a game, so a typical user would visit 100+ pages. When the server is busiest, it gets 35-40k requests/hour. For some misterious reason after a number of hours the

Hello everybody, I have a FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE server running Samba 2.2.8a and a workstation running Windows 2000 SP4. Whereas FTP transfers between these boxes average 700 KB/s (10 mbps LAN) in both directions, Samba transfers are exhibiting this odd behavior: Windows 2000 --> Samba = 700 KB/s (perfect) Samba --> Windows 2000 = 100 KB/s (terrible, inconsistent, with LONG pauses) Trust me,

Here are patches to do offline deduplication for Btrfs. It works well for the cases it''s expected to, I''m looking for feedback on the ioctl interface and such, I''m well aware there are missing features for the userspace app (like being able to set a different blocksize). If this interface is acceptable I will flesh out the userspace app a little more, but I believe the

For quite a while, I''ve experienced oddities with snapshotted Firefox _CACHE_00?_ files, whose checksums (and contents) would change after the btrfs snapshot was taken, and would even change depending on how the file was brought to memory (e.g., rsyncing it to backup storage vs checking its md5sum before or after the rsync). This only affected these cache files, so I didn''t give

Which consumer-priced 1.5TB drives do people currently recommend? I had zero read/write/checksum errors so far in 2 years with my trusty old Western Digital WD7500AAKS drives, but now I want to upgrade to a new set of drives that are big, reliable and cheap. As of Jan 2010 it seems the price sweet spot is the 1.5TB drives. As I had a lot of success with Western Digital drives I thought I would