Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "129s".
Did you mean:
129
2009 Oct 19
2
how to get rid of 2 for-loops and optimize runtime
...A ... 40 50
2009 7 Q3 072009 A ... 50 ...
Table is not exactly the same but gives a good idea what I have and what I want
The code I have written (see below) does what I want but it is very very slow. It takes 129s for 400 rows. And the time gets four times higher each time I double the amount of rows.
I'm new in programming in R, but I found that you can use Rprof and summaryRprof to analyse your code (output see below)
But I don't really understand the output
I guess I need code that requires linear...