search for: 128gib

...module be useful? + * + * You may want to boot PLoP by default from Syslinux when you boot from your + * USB stick/drive: + * 1. PLoP can upgrade USB 1.1 speed offered by the BIOS to USB 2.0 speed + * if you have USB 2.0 controllers on your mobo. + * 2. Some BIOSes only can acees the first 128GiB (137GB) on USB drives, while + * internal hard drives don't neseccarily suffer from this 128GiB problem. + * Using PLoPs USB capabilities, you can access the whole drive. + * + * When you select the "USB" entry in PLoP, it will boot your USB stick/drive + * again and it will...

.../can this be useful? 1. PLoP bootloader is a bootloader that can add USB support (USB-HDD only/UHCI, OHCI and EHCI)) to BIOSes that don't have USB BIOS support. 2. It can also upgrade USB 1.1 speed to USB 2.0 speed if you have USB 2.0 controllers in your mobo. 3. Some BIOSes (like mine) have a 128GiB (137GB) limit for USB drives (internal hard drives don't have the 128GiB problem). Using PLoPs USB capabilities, allow me to access the whole drive. In case 1, ifplop.c32 won't be very useful. In case 2, it will be. You can let PLoP boot by default when you boot (USB 1.1 speed) your USB d...

> Hi > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Anatol Pomozov > <anatol.pomozov at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > > > I keep trying syslinux on my testing machine with BIOS and btrfs on > > root partition. I use syslinux 6.03pre18, kernel 3.15.4. > > > > A number of btrfs related bugs has been fixed in syslinux 6.03 > > recently, but I still

...er safe to blindly assume Sectors/Heads of 63/255, which is how 2.4 and earlier used to deal with dual-booting. > My system has two 120GB disks I've typically found that as long as: A) I'm not dual-booting late NT5.1 hot-fixes/service packs (i.e., SP2+) B) I stay under LBA28/137GB (128GiB) I don't have the issue, even when booting NT and Linux on the same disk. > and a 160 GB disk. As long as it is not the booting disk, and being shared by both NT and Linux for booting, it shouldn't matter. > The 120s have a 1GB DOS, a 24+GB NTFS, and a 84+GB FAT32 partition. >...

I have a lot of people whispering "zfs" in my virtual ear these days, and at the same time I have an irrational attachment to xfs based entirely on its lack of the 32000 subdirectory limit. I''m not afraid of ext4''s newness, since really a lot of that stuff has been in Lustre for years. So a-benchmarking I went. Results at the bottom: