Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "126363".
Did you mean:
126.63
2011 Dec 16
3
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
>> These results have far fewer failures than svn-trunk, and are also
>> comparable to bootstrapping with gcc-4.6.2, summarized here:
>> http://paste.lisp.org/display/126363
>> (Unfortunately, I no longer have the whole build/test log for the gcc46 bootstrap.)
>> This consistency between different bootstraps of the release gives me
>> some hope that g++-4.0.1 is yet usable.
>
> David,
> Another alternative for darwin8 would be to bootstrap...
2011 Dec 16
3
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
...urceforge.net/viewvc/fink/experimental/fangism/finkinfo/llvm30.info?view=log
at revision 1.9. (also patch file needed from the same dir.)
These results have far fewer failures than svn-trunk, and are also
comparable to bootstrapping with gcc-4.6.2, summarized here:
http://paste.lisp.org/display/126363
(Unfortunately, I no longer have the whole build/test log for the gcc46 bootstrap.)
This consistency between different bootstraps of the release gives me some
hope that g++-4.0.1 is yet usable.
I don't know how far diverged trunk is from the 3.0-branch, but there are
far fewer CodeGen test f...
2011 Dec 16
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
...experimental/fangism/finkinfo/llvm30.info?view=log
> at revision 1.9. (also patch file needed from the same dir.)
>
> These results have far fewer failures than svn-trunk, and are also
> comparable to bootstrapping with gcc-4.6.2, summarized here:
> http://paste.lisp.org/display/126363
> (Unfortunately, I no longer have the whole build/test log for the gcc46 bootstrap.)
> This consistency between different bootstraps of the release gives me
> some hope that g++-4.0.1 is yet usable.
David,
Another alternative for darwin8 would be to bootstrap llvm/clang 3.0 using
the...
2011 Dec 16
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:17:32PM -0500, David Fang wrote:
>>> These results have far fewer failures than svn-trunk, and are also
>>> comparable to bootstrapping with gcc-4.6.2, summarized here:
>>> http://paste.lisp.org/display/126363
>>> (Unfortunately, I no longer have the whole build/test log for the gcc46 bootstrap.)
>>> This consistency between different bootstraps of the release gives me
>>> some hope that g++-4.0.1 is yet usable.
>>
>> David,
>> Another alternative for darwin...
2011 Dec 15
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and
> have the following test results to share.
> Summary below, full log at:
> http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/r146586-powerpc-darwin8-results.txt
>
> The only edits required were those I
2011 Dec 15
2
[LLVMdev] llvm/clang test failures on powerpc-darwin8
Hi,
I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and
have the following test results to share.
Summary below, full log at:
http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/r146586-powerpc-darwin8-results.txt
The only edits required were those I posted to llvm-commits yesterday (re:
"some missing clang libs"). And I also edited LitConfig.py to point to