search for: 11d

Hello, I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a single user, listing all GPOs is working: ------------------ root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} display name : Default Domain Policy path : \\example2.net\sysvol\example2.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} dn : CN={31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=example2,DC=net version : 0 flags : NONE GPO...

...o, > >> > >> I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a > single user, > >> listing all GPOs is working: > >> ------------------ > >> > >> root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall > >> GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} > >> display name : Default Domain Policy > >> path : > >> \\example2.net\sysvol\example2.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D > >> 2-945F-00C04FB984F9} > >> dn : > >> CN={31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9},CN...

...t lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] GPO-Error > > Hello, > > I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a single user, > listing all GPOs is working: > ------------------ > > root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall > GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} > display name : Default Domain Policy > path : > \\example2.net\sysvol\example2.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D > 2-945F-00C04FB984F9} > dn : > CN={31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9},CN=Policies,CN=Syste > m,DC=example2,DC=net > vers...

...exe cygpopt-0.dll cygwin1.dll I have just tested rsync with a 571Mb zip file containing our Backup Exec installation source. The command I am running is: rsync -avp --delete --progress --stats /cygdrive/c/rsync_test/ "/cygdrive/Y/" > rsync_log.txt First I copied the file BackUpExec-11D.7170_32BIT_VERSION.zip into both source and target and ran an rsysnc (I didn't have the progress or stats switches on the first run). This is what my log shows: building file list ... 0 files... 2 files to consider ./ Number of files: 2 Number of files transferred: 0 Total file size: 58474...

...timus capabilities: enabled, status dynamic power, hda bios codec supported 50.247005 VGA switcheroo: detected Optimus DSM method \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP handle 50.247084 nseval-0227 ns_evaluate : **** Execute method [\_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON] at AML address ffffc9000001086e length 11D 50.390140 pcieport 0000:00:01.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0 50.491893 nseval-0227 ns_evaluate : **** Execute method [\_SB.PCI0.PEG0._DSW] at AML address ffffc90000010a2d length 1D 50.492285 pcieport 0000:00:01.0: PME# disabled 50.492583 nouveau 0000:01:00.0: unkn...

> OK, attempting one more convergence on all this, here's > what I did: > > 1. Reverted back to rev 1.5 of src/libFLAC/ia32/Makefile.am > 2. Applied Matt's last cleanup patch of 8 files. I did not > apply the patch to src/test_unit/main.c since it looks wrong. > main.c is supposed to include the local bitbuffer.h, not > src/libFLAC/private/bitbuffer.h; I think the

...bilities: enabled, status dynamic power, hda bios codec supported > 50.247005 VGA switcheroo: detected Optimus DSM method \_SB_.PCI0.PEG0.PEGP handle > 50.247084 nseval-0227 ns_evaluate : **** Execute method [\_SB.PCI0.PEG0.PG00._ON] at AML address ffffc9000001086e length 11D > 50.390140 pcieport 0000:00:01.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0 > 50.491893 nseval-0227 ns_evaluate : **** Execute method [\_SB.PCI0.PEG0._DSW] at AML address ffffc90000010a2d length 1D > 50.492285 pcieport 0000:00:01.0: PME# disabled > 50.492583 nouvea...

...st I managed running install and it seems to work). Then I wanted to install it on my home PC which is newer & faster, and got this unreadeable debug message (for me) when entering "wine setup.exe" from CDRom : wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x7fe17b7a at address 0x11df:0x0000 761a (thread 000a), starting debugger... WineDbg starting on pid 0x8 fixme: dbghelp:SymLoadModule Should have successfully loaded debug information fo r image Z:\mnt\cdrom\SETUP.EXE Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x7fe17b7a in 16-bit code (11d f:761a). In 16 bit mode. R...

...race; c0145d5a <block_getblk+16a/31c> Trace; c0146136 <ext3_getblk+22a/238> Trace; c0143bd2 <ext3_file_write+566/95c> Trace; c01267c0 <sys_write+d4/104> Trace; c010b018 <common_interrupt+18/20> Trace; c010a0b8 <system_call+34/38> Trace; c010002b <startup_32+2b/11d> Code; c0142ba3 <ext3_new_block+557/6c8> 00000000 <_EIP>: Code; c0142ba3 <ext3_new_block+557/6c8> <===== 0: f3 ab repz stos %eax,%es:(%edi) <===== Code; c0142ba5 <ext3_new_block+559/6c8> 2: f6 c3 02 test $0x2,%...

...ght. I'm new at this and originally changed the default GPO, however subsequently reset the default and created a new GPO. (so this getfacl output is post creation of a new GPO) The getfacl output is shown here: # getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydomain.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydomain.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} # owner: root # group: 10013 user::rwx user:root:rwx user:3000002:rwx user:3000003:r-x user:3000006:rwx user:30000...

...at this and originally changed the default GPO, however subsequently reset the default and created a new GPO. (so this getfacl output is post creation of a new GPO) > > The getfacl output is shown here: > > # getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydomain.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} > getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydomain.com/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9} > # owner: root > # group: 10013 > user::rwx > user:root:rwx > user:3000002:rwx > user:3000...

...d/ipc.c:(292) api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11a [2002/03/05 14:20:06, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292) api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11b [2002/03/05 14:20:06, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292) api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11c [2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292) api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11d [2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292) api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11e [2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292) api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 11f [2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292) api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 120 [2002/03/05 14:20:24, 1] smbd/ipc.c:(292) api_fd...

...the Administrator user ...but my windows domain test client "ignores" the new policy completely and in the event log on the client I see the following: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows attempted to read the file \\mydomain.com\sysvol\mydomain.com\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB 984F9}\gpt.ini <file://mydomain.com/sysvol/mydomain.com/Policies/%7b31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F -00C04FB984F9%7d/gpt.ini> from a domain controller and was not successful. Group Policy settings may not be applied until this event is resolved. This issue may be transient and could be...

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 06:03:27PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > nouveau_drm_load() calls pm_runtime_put() if nouveau_runtime_pm != 0, > but nouveau_drm_unload() calls pm_runtime_get_sync() unconditionally. > We therefore leak a runtime pm ref whenever nouveau is loaded with > runpm=0 and then unloaded. The GPU will subsequently never runtime > suspend even if nouveau is loaded again

...o > 112: 00 00 addb %al, (%eax) > > _getfoo: > 114: 50 pushl %eax > 115: 89 e0 movl %esp, %eax > 117: c7 00 00 00 00 00 movl $0, (%eax) > 00000119: IMAGE_REL_I386_DIR32 _foo > 11d: e8 00 00 00 00 calll 0 <_getfoo+0xE> > 0000011e: IMAGE_REL_I386_REL32 _getGlobal > 122: 59 popl %ecx > 123: c3 retl > 124: 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 nopw > %cs:(%eax,%eax) > >...

...gt;> >>> _getfoo: >>> 114: 50 pushl %eax >>> 115: 89 e0 movl %esp, %eax >>> 117: c7 00 00 00 00 00 movl $0, (%eax) >>> 00000119: IMAGE_REL_I386_DIR32 _foo >>> 11d: e8 00 00 00 00 calll 0 <_getfoo+0xE> >>> 0000011e: IMAGE_REL_I386_REL32 _getGlobal >>> 122: 59 popl %ecx >>> 123: c3 retl >>> 124: 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 nopw...

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Nikodemus Siivola < nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote: > Uh. Turns out that if I hide the pointer to @foo from LLVM by passing it > through an opaque identity function ... then everything works fine. > > Is this a bug in LLVM or is there some magic involving globals I'm > misunderstanding? > This looks like a bug in the handling of

...sterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110510/78e0b 11d/attachment-0001.htm> ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:03:47 +0530 From: mahesh katta <maheshkatta at flexydial.com> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] OUTBOUND CALLER ID To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users at list...

The series introduces auto-generation of the type definitions used in the libxl interface followed by auto-generation of a destructor function for each type. In the future it may be possible to use the related data structures for other purposes, for example auto-generation of the functions to marshal between C and language binding data types. tools/_libxl_types.h should be identical both before

...Fd8cn!u~aX3~6{FG2l3z^BI> zvXrXY!j6bpe^ER(lp|K%ANdWYD(+T;wN6h$AzOUD)dL}HQmJ%*ZQnj5^>NJOe>KIV z1jZ{Aidm8*nZEw|>%ym>jKNy{Ig~6%rl3`$D7ljH7ccdB4|{uiw#*8^_}aIR=TZ_R z#Fv$&I)?WmXyn&=pQt3AmVIwFpq|48-0R-?TgAu0^~}b!T6jWsOltH_q8Id}Lx%$N zY3Lm|V2RJDRX8>&ujdo}^)M__f2Lj~Qv5p6fDbp1z*~11d*e)8TlU7mKNPiv9onLN ziqdZqA9I4t(|br&xv;@z82cOtQe;s1!ud0*A9HO6&C=EpR`@UViq2wMoQy(S%zx^A z#Xg5YynOQ$-VMs6$*9j|$L^l>GP85KvBy!~%Wy9<uMMDsa{(GdOY&0UC{4c!Iq?*! zZF#G~VbYA`vL7x*7Z@M+4t`vx-Sj{7%CcWtw~(dV&oZyxvWNQvRDw!Vf^BL-Sx`tz zlKDvh#lTKMkk%L(34d+fIw-f=Cvgw|i*FFE6bi+6q9_J5Y0^acZt(&am...