Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "119mb".
Did you mean:
110mb
2015 Jul 23
1
[PATCH] appliance: exclude /usr/share/fonts and /usr/share/icons.
I also sorted the list.
Between libguestfs 1.28 and 1.30, the appliance grew from 95MB to 213MB.
Using guestmount and filelight (see link below) I could see that the
main contributor was these two directories, which should not be
necessary.
With this change, the size goes down to 119MB.
See also:
https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2015/07/23/why-has-the-libguestfs-appliance-grown-by-118-mb/
---
appliance/excludefiles.in | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/appliance/excludefiles.in b/appliance/excludefiles.in
index 1564386..d3c66cc 100644
--- a...
2002 Oct 15
1
R memory
Hello
I was doing PCA (principal component analysis) with a DNA
expression matrix (7000 rows/38 columns; from golubEsets) but I
had the following problem
"Error:cannot allocate vector of size 397051 Kb
In addition: Warning message:
Reached total allocation of 119Mb: see help(memory.size)"
I've already done some filtering (reduced to 3051 rows) but the
problem remains, only the size of the vector to allocate is
smaller.
Can I allocate more memory? How? Probably the problem is also
from the machine itself, which is a Pentium III 700 Mhz 128Mb
RA...
2011 Feb 19
0
DomU RAM
Hi Everyone,
When I set my Debian Squeeze DomU config file to have 128MB of RAM,
"free -m" only shows 119MB.
Does anyone know what the discrepancy is about?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2011 Jul 18
0
Kernel memory initialisation
...og/kern.log | tail -n1
Jul 18 12:40:10 roy kernel: [ 0.000000] Memory: 46492k/4202496k
available (2894k kernel code, 4063680k absent, 92324k reserved, 1826k
data, 444k init)
Then I add mem=128M in "extra" area of my xmdomain cfg, and now I have a
descent amount of usable memory (119MB) :
# head -n 1 /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 122708 kB
# grep Memory /var/log/kern.log | tail -n1
Jul 18 13:14:10 roy kernel: [ 0.000000] Memory: 114356k/131072k
available (2894k kernel code, 448k absent, 16268k reserved, 1826k data,
444k init)
But adding this parameter is not a "g...
2020 Sep 23
1
[Bug 1469] New: Bison reported unused tokens in `nft`
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1469
Bug ID: 1469
Summary: Bison reported unused tokens in `nft`
Product: nftables
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P5
Component: nft
Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org
2018 Apr 21
0
What is the maximum speed for download from a samba share
...I can download with
> 100 kbit/s
>
> So the question? is it possible to get more speed or is this the maximum
> speed with samba?
>
> I tried a lot of hints for samba tuning but nothing was faster.
>
100 kbit/s? as in 12.2KB/s? Ouch.
I was able to get 125mB on writes and 119mB reads using a 1gbit ethernet.
I start to lose speed on 10gb with limiting factor being cpu on
client OR server depending on packet size.
Sent a recent note to the cygwin list (used cygwin in the testing).
My experience was to use the cifs protocol as easiest (over a local
network). With a 10Gb...
2018 Apr 20
3
What is the maximum speed for download from a samba share
What is the maximum speed for download from a samba share?
I have a 100 kbit/s Internet
The maximum speed for a download from my webserver with samba is about
25.000 kbit/s
The bottleneck is the samba access. Without samba I can download with
100 kbit/s
So the question? is it possible to get more speed or is this the maximum
speed with samba?
I tried a lot of hints for samba tuning but
2018 Oct 05
5
[Bug 13645] New: Improve efficiency when resuming transfer of large files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13645
Bug ID: 13645
Summary: Improve efficiency when resuming transfer of large
files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee:
2012 Nov 29
2
rsync using huge traffic
Hey,
I'm using rsync to backup my server but there is a problem because
rsync is using very huge amounts traffic. But first to the setup. The
server I backup has 4GB of data and I use the following command to
backup this data. /usr/bin/rsync -aze 'ssh -i /root/.ssh/backup.key -l
backupuser' --rsync-path='sudo rsync' --delete --exclude-from=ex.list
$SRC $TRG
The problem is
2013 Jul 30
3
SMB throughput inquiry, Jeremy, and James' bow tie
I went to the site to subscribe again and ended up watching some of
Jeremy's Google interviews. I particularly enjoyed the interview with
James and the bow tie lesson at the end. :)
So anyway, I recently upgraded my home network to end-to-end GbE. My
clients are Windows XP SP3 w/hot fixes, and my Samba server is 3.5.6
atop vanilla kernel.org Linux 3.2.6 and Debian 6.0.6.
With FDX fast
2008 Aug 16
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5695] New: rsync local timeout
...:
# strace -f /usr/bin/rsync --timeout=600 -v -a -x --timeout=300 --numeric-ids
--delete --delete-excluded /mnt/dati2/dati /mnt/extra/Backups > /tmp/rsync.out
2> /tmp/rsync.err
rsync.out contains:
sending incremental file list
dati/Documenti/Gabriele/Maildir/.Bozze/tmp/
rsync.err cointains 119Mb of data, I'm trying to strip most significant part
(last 100 lines):
[pid 3083]
lstat64("dati/Documenti/Gabriele/Maildir/.Bugtraq.2006/cur/1196954597.M629924P20705V0000000000000906I00053A8C_3331.transylvania,S=5064:2,S",
{st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=5064, ...}) = 0
[pid 3083]
lsta...