search for: 110mb

Hello, Am 03.05.2015 um 17:38 schrieb ????????? ????????: > Thank you for your time. What network did you test it? > 100Mb or 1000Mb? I'm using 1Gbit here at home. With a 100Mbit connection it wouldn't be possible to reach transfer rates of 110MB/Sec. A realistic good transfer rate for a 100Mbit connection is just around 11 MB/Sec. Regards, Marc

Hello, We have our mac connected to a SAN via 10Gbe fiber network. Being thunderbolt model macs with no PCI slots we are using external boxes (Sonnet, ATTO) to interface between the thunderbolt and fiber connections. When using rsync -avvPhi we get speeds of approx 110MB/s but with a simple drag-and-drop we get speeds of approx 620MB/s. BIG difference. We get the same speeds (roughly) whether we connect afp or smb. Anyone have any suggestions for what to do to make the rsync transfer faster? These are local transfers with the SAN showing up as a shared drive on...

...39;postgres'') res=db.exec("select * from users limit 300000") res.clear puts "After clear result object" a=1 while a!=2 end Before running this program,Initial free memory is 640MB The query("select * from users limit 300000") execution taken the time is upto 110MB when i run this program .. So free memory is reduced from 640MB to 530MB..Now used memory is 110MB that released after the execution of the query ie program reached the while conditions I have followed same scenario in Rail''s active_record instead of PGconn.. @users=User.all(:limit=>...

...or gaming when the nieces and nephews are over it holds the master image of the games. Unfortunately data transfers vary from 1MB to 2MBs from samba to winders whereas winders to winders does several times as fast It does not apear to be the hub or the network cards as the following indicates A 110MB file xferred from samba linux - linux takes about 77s doing the same over NFS takes 11s. I also did this with a 740MB iso 88s over nfs ~ 440 over smbfs ?? I get similar transfer rates when using the samba server on my pc. I have tested this also with a base smb.conf consisting only of - server n...

Hi all, I am trying to get some decent speed out of a vanilla Debian (Proxmox) box and am running out of ideas. Basically I can exchange data at 110MB/sec (raw, nfs, ftp) but not with Samba shares. I tried almost every samba tuning tip I could find to no avail. The only optimisation left to smb.conf at the moment is debug level = 0. As one can see the robocopy throughput is merely half of what would be expected. Any hints? Best regards Udo ro...

...ns, by giving it a second interface that connects to a bridge with access to the iSCSI VLAN? I set one up that way instead, and it works as expected though it seems to perform less well in some admittedly simple tests using dd with ''oflag=direct'' set. The dom0 can write at about 110MB/s sustained, but if the domU makes the iSCSI connection instead it''s doing well to manage 60MB/s. So I''m looking to the wisdom of the list, is it crazy to set things up one way or the other, or are they both an OK approach? It seems like having the dom0 handle the iSCSI connecti...

...1.6 - I do not need all those AD-Features, I just need to mount the shares on two Windows 7 systems. Nothing more or less - this is the only feature I need. I use the same configuration that I used with Samba 3 (testparm says it is fine). The simple question is - why do I reach transfer rates of ~110MB/Sec with Samba 3 and only ~45 MB/Sec with Samba 4? With such a mega-drop in performance Samba 4 seems not to be an alternative for me? :( :( I wonder what I could have done wrong? I'm running Samba 3 and 4 in seperate FreeBSD 10 jails identically configured. The shared filesystem is nullfs mou...

...CJITStreamer. - The Finish method of MCAssembler have a new optional argument "Writer" to allow a custom MCJITObjectWriter to be used. Can you give us some feedbacks on the general idea and on this 2 particular hooks ? Currently MCJIT has one unittest and the binary size is quite big (~110MB in debug...) because before using the MC framework we need to call "InitializeAllTargets()" and friends (same as llc does). For the JIT, we need only the "host" backend and "InitializeHostTarget()"-like method doesn't seem to exist. Do you have an opinion on this ?...

...(84 GB) copied, 275.466 seconds, 305 MB/s real 4m35.468s user 0m0.373s sys 0m48.074s Write Results: ============== I see degraded IO performance when doing sequential IO write tests with vhost-blk compared to virtio-blk. # time dd of=/dev/vda if=/dev/zero bs=2M oflag=direct I get ~110MB/sec with virtio-blk, but I get only ~60MB/sec with vhost-blk. Wondering why ? Comments/flames ? Thanks, Badari vhost-blk is in-kernel accelerator for virtio-blk. At this time, this is a prototype based on virtio-net. Lots of error handling and clean up needs to be done. Read performance is pr...

...(84 GB) copied, 275.466 seconds, 305 MB/s real 4m35.468s user 0m0.373s sys 0m48.074s Write Results: ============== I see degraded IO performance when doing sequential IO write tests with vhost-blk compared to virtio-blk. # time dd of=/dev/vda if=/dev/zero bs=2M oflag=direct I get ~110MB/sec with virtio-blk, but I get only ~60MB/sec with vhost-blk. Wondering why ? Comments/flames ? Thanks, Badari vhost-blk is in-kernel accelerator for virtio-blk. At this time, this is a prototype based on virtio-net. Lots of error handling and clean up needs to be done. Read performance is pr...

...MCAssembler have a new optional argument > "Writer" to allow a custom MCJITObjectWriter to be used. > > Can you give us some feedbacks on the general idea and on this 2 > particular hooks ? > > > Currently MCJIT has one unittest and the binary size is quite big > (~110MB in debug...) because before using the MC framework we need to > call "InitializeAllTargets()" and friends (same as llc does). For the > JIT, we need only the "host" backend and "InitializeHostTarget()"-like > method doesn't seem to exist. Do you have an op...

Hi, I'm looking for some recommendations for a "fast" fileserver regarding the hardware you use. We have different fileservers as our requirements changed over time. The "main" problem we are faced with is, that with smb (windows 7 and OS X) clients we never get really close to GBit speed on reads or writes. Using the same servers/storages with ftp, ssh, rsync, nfs we

Hi, I'm trying to setup a bridge with a bonded device (2 links, balance-rr). The problem is that after attaching the bonded device to the bridge the network throughput drops down from 110MB to 100KB. This seems to be due to the MAC address of internal devices of the bridge being seen on the external ports, where the bonded device exists (see also the URLs below). An arp packet from some device on the bridge gets out on one slave and returns on the other, so the bridge suddenly moves...

Hi, I have a server and ten clients in a Gigabit network. The server has 125mbps network bandwidth. I want that the server has 40Mbps bandwidth reserved for client 1 (IP 192.168.5.141), and the rest bandwidth is for all other clients. My script looks like this (I use IFB for incoming traffic): #!/bin/bash export TC="/sbin/tc" $TC qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 1: htb default 30

...ng the provided IDE cable. I have tried three hard disks, all with similar results. (2x 40gb + 1x 160gb) lspci | grep IDE gives 00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP78S [GeForce 8200] IDE (rev a1) As a reference, hdparm -t against the SATA drive in AHCI mode on the same board gives about 110MB/Sec. Any ideas, anyone? Thanks in advance, Ian. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090810/c8860b8b/attachment-0003.html>

Hi all, i am learning cucumber and when i am trying to run rake cucumber:ok resulting in following error: C:/Ruby187/bin/ruby -S bundle exec cucumber --profile default *** WARNING: You must use ANSICON 1.31 or higher ( http://adoxa.110mb.com/ansicon ) to get coloured output on Windows Using the default profile... Feature: Creating projects In order to have projects to assign tickets to As a user I want to create them easily Scenario: Creating a project # features\creating_projects.feature:6...

Here my samba conf file: [global] ??? workgroup = MYGROUP ?? ?server string = Samba Server Version %v ? ??? interfaces = lo eth0 x.x.x.x/x #my ip and mask ?? ?hosts allow = 127. 10.0. ??? log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m ?? ?max log size = 50 # ----------------------- Standalone Server Options ------------------------ ?? ?security = user ?? ?passdb backend = tdbsam #

...e CCed Josh Durgin and Jeff Cody for ideas on reducing > block/rbd.c memory consumption. Is it possible to pass a > scatter-gather list so I/O can be performed directly on guest memory? > This would also improve performance slightly. It's not just rbd. I've seen qemu RSS jump by 110MB when accessing qcow2 images on an NFS-mounted filesystem. When the guest is configured with 512MB that's fairly significant. Chris

...e CCed Josh Durgin and Jeff Cody for ideas on reducing > block/rbd.c memory consumption. Is it possible to pass a > scatter-gather list so I/O can be performed directly on guest memory? > This would also improve performance slightly. It's not just rbd. I've seen qemu RSS jump by 110MB when accessing qcow2 images on an NFS-mounted filesystem. When the guest is configured with 512MB that's fairly significant. Chris

Hi, this is my first pos here, please be lenient. My problem shuld be a FAQ and, in fact I found a lot of references googling around, but nothing could really solve my problem, so here I am. I have a Samba server: Very basic wheezy amd64 installation on a small VIRTUAL server (Xen). Only fancy thing is direct access to a couple of RAID1 (mirror) arrays where data is stored. I normally access