search for: 112mb

...th samba 3.5.10 server 2: centos 6.4 with samba 3.6.9 both servers are configured as BDC and have - aside from netbios name - identical smb.conf which contains ldapsam as backend and all other parameters are not set (i.e. default) When I mount a share from a linux client, the transfer speed is ~112MB/sec to either server from any linux client. However, when I mount a share from Windows clients, the speed to server 1 is ~95MB/s and to server 2 ~85MB/s. We tested this with several windows clients (all running Windows 7 with all updates). The speed difference between linux client and windows c...

...he xensource drivers, the speed was about 78 MB/s. The Windows system was a XP SP2. hdparm on the dom0 gives about 60MB/s. The network test was an ftp transfer, just downloading a 500MB file, without writing it to disk, writing to nul. The same in the dom0, writing the file to /dev/null gave me 112MB/s. So I am wondering, what are the expected speed gains for the gplpv drivers? Is the performance of the drivers bettter with different windows versions, e.g. windows server 2003? kind regards Sebastian _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xenso...

Hi all, I've got two gigabit ethernet interfaces bonded in CentOS 5.6. I've set "miimode=1000" and I've tried "mode=" 0, 4 and 6. I've not been able to get better than 112MB/sec, which is the same as the non-bonded interfaces. My config files are: === cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-{eth1,eth2,bond0} # SN1 HWADDR=00:30:48:fd:26:71 DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO=none MASTER=bond0 SLAVE=yes # SN2 HWADDR=00:1B:21:87:80:CE DEVICE=eth2 BOOTPROTO=none MASTER=bond0 SLA...

...partitioning as suggested by the installer (ext3, small /boot on /dev/sda1, remainder as / on LVM VolGroup with 2GB swap). Firmware from 3Ware codeset 9.4.1.2 in use, firmware/driver details: //serv1> /c0 show all /c0 Driver Version = 2.26.05.007 /c0 Model = 9550SX-8LP /c0 Memory Installed = 112MB /c0 Firmware Version = FE9X 3.08.02.005 /c0 Bios Version = BE9X 3.08.00.002 /c0 Monitor Version = BL9X 3.01.00.006 I initially noticed something odd while installing 4.4, that writing the inode tables took a longer time than I expected (I thought the installer had frozen) and the system overall...

...need to use NFS over a VPN. Our current tinc network seems to be able to transmit at around 30-40 MB/s. (I used an 1GB random testfile to copy to/from /dev/shm/; using netcat and http.) In comparison, HTTP and scp are 300MB/s and 200MB/s respectively (over 10Gb link; over 1Gb link, both are around 112MB/s). By observing _top_ output, it seems that the CPU usage is around 90% for the tinc process on at least one of the transmitting machines. I tried to change the cipher to aes-128-cbc, but it did not have any significant effect on transmit speed. How can I know tinc operation eats up my CPU? Are...

...ine as the drives hit the 5 year age mark. So I took the 12 drives out, added 24 drives to the machine (we had unused slots), reconfigured raid 6 and left it initializing in the background and started the heal of 13.1TB of data. My servers are connected via 10Gbit (I am not seeing reads/writes over 112MB/s) and this process started last Monday at 7;20PM and it is not done yet. It is missing healing about 40GB still. Now my servers are used as a file server, which means lots of small files which take longer to heal. I would think your VM images will heal much faster. > I want to turn every VM of...

Hi, I'm running samba server on board and client is windows 7. I did below steps for performance tests. + format /dev/sda1 with ext4 + mount the drive in server as mentioned in [media] path of /etc/samba/smb.conf + created a root password $ smbpasswd -a root + 1Gb ethernet interface from board. + map the driver in windows + did a 4gb robocopy + read got 13MBps and write got 105MBps

Hi, thanks for suggesions. Yes "gluster peer probe node3? will be first command in order to discover 3rd node by Gluster. I am running on latest 3.7.x - there is 3.7.6-1ubuntu1 installed and latest 3.7.x according https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/glusterfs-server <https://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/glusterfs-server> is 3.7.6-1ubuntu1, so this should be OK. > If you are *not* on

...t the 5 year age mark. So I took the 12 drives > out, added 24 drives to the machine (we had unused slots), > reconfigured raid 6 and left it initializing in the background and > started the heal of 13.1TB of data. My servers are connected via > 10Gbit (I am not seeing reads/writes over 112MB/s) and this process > started last Monday at 7;20PM and it is not done yet. It is missing > healing about 40GB still. Now my servers are used as a file server, > which means lots of small files which take longer to heal. I would > think your VM images will heal much faster. > >&g...