Displaying 20 results from an estimated 36 matches for "110s".
Did you mean:
10s
2013 Aug 14
7
Disk add fails while domain creation, which uses disk backend- "storage driver domain" with xen-4.3.0 , with errors libxl.c:2125
...]
And I got this console log -
[ 5.588091] XENBUS: Waiting for devices to initialise: 25s...20s...15s...10s...5s...0s...235s...230s...225s...220s...215s...210s...205s...200s...195s...190s...185s...180s...175s...170s...165s...160s...155s...150s...145s...140s...135s...130s...125s...120s...115s...110s...105s...100s...95s...90s...85s...80s...75s...70s...65s...60s...55s...50s...45s...40s...35s...30s...25s...20s...15s...10s...5s...0s...
[ 270.588319] XENBUS: Timeout connecting to device: device/vbd/51713 (local state 3, remote state 2)
[ 270.588492] Magic number: 1:252:3141
[ 270.588543] drivers...
2013 Aug 14
7
Disk add fails while domain creation, which uses disk backend- "storage driver domain" with xen-4.3.0 , with errors libxl.c:2125
...]
And I got this console log -
[ 5.588091] XENBUS: Waiting for devices to initialise: 25s...20s...15s...10s...5s...0s...235s...230s...225s...220s...215s...210s...205s...200s...195s...190s...185s...180s...175s...170s...165s...160s...155s...150s...145s...140s...135s...130s...125s...120s...115s...110s...105s...100s...95s...90s...85s...80s...75s...70s...65s...60s...55s...50s...45s...40s...35s...30s...25s...20s...15s...10s...5s...0s...
[ 270.588319] XENBUS: Timeout connecting to device: device/vbd/51713 (local state 3, remote state 2)
[ 270.588492] Magic number: 1:252:3141
[ 270.588543] drivers...
2009 Jun 03
1
Install suse11 on redhat5, thanks for help!
...D information not available.
BIOS EDD facility v0.16 2004-Jun-25, 0 devices found
EDD information not available.
BIOS EDD facility v0.16 2004-Jun-25, 0 devices found
EDD information not available.
RPC: Registered udp transport module.
RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
loop: module loaded
115s...110s...105s...100s...95s...90s...85s...80s...75s...70s...65s...60s...55s...50s...45s...40s...35s...30s...25s...20s...15s...10s...5s...0s...
XENBUS: Device not ready: device/vbd/51712
Thanks for your help!
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xens...
2009 Dec 20
6
Problem with tap:aio
...NBUS: Waiting for devices to initialise:
295s...290s...285s...280s...275s...270s...265s...260s...255s...250s...245s...240s...235s...230s...225s...220s...215s...210s...205s...200s...195s...190s...185s...180s...175s...170s...165s...160s...155s...150s...145s...140s...135s...130s...125s...120s...115s...110s...105s...100s...95s...90s...85s...80s...75s...70s...65s...60s...55s...50s...45s...40s...35s...30s...25s...20s...15s...10s...5s...0s...
[ 301.076163] XENBUS: Timeout connecting to device: device/vbd/2050 (local
state 3, remote state 2)
[ 301.076173] XENBUS: Device not ready: device/vbd/2050
[ 301...
2014 Jun 16
1
Centos 6.5 Xen Stock cannot run dom-u PCI: Fatal: - ipmi_si
...NBUS: Waiting for devices to initialise:
295s...290s...285s...280s...275s...270s...265s...260s...255s...250s...245s...240s...235s...230s...225s...220s...215s...210s...205s...200s...195s...190s...185s...180s...175s...170s...165s...160s...155s...150s...145s...140s...135s...130s...125s...120s...115s...110s...105s...100s...95s...90s...85s...80s...75s...70s...65s...60s...55s...50s...45s...40s...35s...30s...25s...20s...15s...10s...5s...0s...
XENBUS: Timeout connecting to device: device/vbd/51712 (local state 3,
remote state 1)
Loading dm-mod.ko module
device-mapper: uevent: version 1.0.3
device-mapper:...
2018 Jan 20
2
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...enchmark cases. When building
blink_core.dll and browser_tests.exe, i get anywhere from a 20-40%
reduction in link time. We have some other optimizations in the pipeline
but not upstream yet.
My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet upstream) is 28s
on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <santagada at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> You probably don't want to go down the same route that clang goes through
>>...
2018 Jan 20
0
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...> blink_core.dll and browser_tests.exe, i get anywhere from a 20-40%
> reduction in link time. We have some other optimizations in the pipeline
> but not upstream yet.
>
> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet upstream) is
> 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <santagada at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You probably don't want to go down the same route tha...
2018 Jan 20
2
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...and browser_tests.exe, i get anywhere from a 20-40%
>> reduction in link time. We have some other optimizations in the pipeline
>> but not upstream yet.
>>
>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet upstream) is
>> 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <santagada at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You probably don't want t...
2018 Jan 20
0
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...xe, i get anywhere from a 20-40%
>>> reduction in link time. We have some other optimizations in the pipeline
>>> but not upstream yet.
>>>
>>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet upstream) is
>>> 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <santagada at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Y...
2018 Jan 20
2
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...rom a 20-40%
>>>> reduction in link time. We have some other optimizations in the pipeline
>>>> but not upstream yet.
>>>>
>>>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet upstream) is
>>>> 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <
>>>> santagada at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>&g...
2018 Jan 22
2
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...duction in link time. We have some other optimizations in the pipeline
>>>>>> but not upstream yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet upstream)
>>>>>> is 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <
>>>>>> santagada at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
>>>&g...
2018 Jan 21
0
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...;>>> reduction in link time. We have some other optimizations in the pipeline
>>>>> but not upstream yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet upstream)
>>>>> is 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <
>>>>> santagada at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
>>>>>> wrote...
2018 Jan 22
0
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...time. We have some other optimizations in the pipeline
>>>>>>> but not upstream yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet upstream)
>>>>>>> is 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <
>>>>>>> santagada at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com
&g...
2018 Jan 22
2
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...me other optimizations in the pipeline
>>>>>>>> but not upstream yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet
>>>>>>>> upstream) is 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <
>>>>>>>> santagada at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Zachary Turner <
>>...
2018 Jan 22
2
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...peline
>>>>>>>>>> but not upstream yet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet
>>>>>>>>>> upstream) is 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <
>>>>>>>>>> santagada at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:05...
2018 Jan 22
0
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...ations in the pipeline
>>>>>>>>> but not upstream yet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet
>>>>>>>>> upstream) is 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <
>>>>>>>>> santagada at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Zachary Tur...
2012 Nov 25
2
Cannot open root device xvda1 or unknown-block(0,0)
...Bridge firewalling registered
[ 5.360075] XENBUS: Waiting for devices to initialise:
25s...20s...15s...10s...5s...0s...235s...230s...225s...220s...215s...210s...
205s...200s...195s...190s...185s...180s...175s...170s...165s...160s...155s...
150s...145s...140s...135s...130s...125s...120s...115s...110s...105s...100s...
95s...90s...85s...80s...75s...70s...65s...60s...55s...50s...45s...40s...
35s...30s...25s...20s...15s...10s...5s...0s...
[ 270.360180] XENBUS: Timeout connecting to device: device/vbd/51713 (local
state 3, remote state 1)
[ 270.360273] md: Waiting for all devices to be available b...
2018 Jan 24
2
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...gt;>>>>> but not upstream yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet
>>>>>>>>>>>> upstream) is 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <
>>>>>>>>>>>> santagada at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>&...
2018 Jan 22
0
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...gt;>>>>>>>> but not upstream yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet
>>>>>>>>>>> upstream) is 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <
>>>>>>>>>>> santagada at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan...
2018 Jan 25
0
[lldb-dev] Trying out lld to link windows binaries (using msvc as a compiler)
...gt;>> but not upstream yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My best time so far (including other optimizations not yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>> upstream) is 28s on blink_core.dll, compared to 110s with /debug
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 12:28 PM Leonardo Santagada <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> santagada at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>&...