Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1041625".
Did you mean:
1001625
2014 Oct 27
2
[LLVMdev] on type annotations of LLVM IR
Hi,
I am curious to know the design decision on why operands of LLVM IR
instructions are type annotated.
Why wasn't the C style of explicit declaration of variables (or values in
LLVM context) followed by their uses model not adopted here?
or may be even annotate the value (result of the Instruction) with type
rather than annotating each operands on the Instruction?
Just felt that by