Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1001625".
Did you mean:
1001,25
2008 Dec 09
4
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Add sub.ovf/mul.ovf intrinsics
Hi,
Here is the next iteration of the patch. The only comment not
addressed is this one:
> It would be better to implement a target-independent check for
> overflow for the "Legal" case (like how SADDO does). Hacker's > Delight
> has some hints on how to do this. It's not easy for the signed case,
> but is do-able.
It can be lowered to a division + a branch,