Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1027798".
Did you mean:
1027778
2013 Jan 08
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LTO "bug" and Clang warnings
On 8 January 2013 18:40, Matthieu Monrocq <matthieu.monrocq at gmail.com>wrote:
> I do believe it's undefined.
>
> §5.2.1 Subscripting [expr.sub]
> ...
> §5.7 Additive operators [expr.add]
> ...
>
Still, doesn't explicitly say it's undefined. I agree this gives the
freedom of implementers to extend naturally, but it's at least arguable. I
have the 2011