search for: 1027778

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1027778".

Did you mean: 102777
2013 Jan 08
6
[LLVMdev] LTO "bug" and Clang warnings
After looking at the Livermore for a while, we found the issue that was causing LTO to produce a different result. Consider the code below [1]. setup() doesn't touch bar/baz, main() doesn't reference foo. LTO finds, correctly, that it can remove the setup(), but the result is different. The code is clearly wrong, but the compiler has no right to fix user's stupidity, even at that