Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1027794".
Did you mean:
1027798
2013 Jan 08
4
[LLVMdev] LTO "bug" and Clang warnings
On 8 January 2013 16:53, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by "fix user's stupidity" here - could you
> clarify?
>
Buffer overrun on foo[20] and relying on it for bar[20].
It might not even be an error to access foo[50] even though foo only has 20
elements (via pointer indirection rules), but it's user error to do so,