search for: 102547

...me precedent for setting custom timeout thresholds for various benchmarks on different architectures (sometimes with comments that it's done so we can run O0 on that particular benchmark). >> >> Something along these lines works: >> https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/ <https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/> >> >> What do you guys think about this approach? > > Looks reasonable to me. > >> >> Thanks, >> Diana >> >> PS: The buildbot is using the Makefiles because that's what our other...

...for setting custom timeout thresholds for various benchmarks on different architectures (sometimes with comments that it's done so we can run O0 on that particular benchmark). >>> >>> Something along these lines works: >>> https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/ <https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/> >>> >>> What do you guys think about this approach? >> >> Looks reasonable to me. >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Diana >>> >>> PS: The buildbot is using the Make...

...per-bot basis, but I see some precedent for setting custom timeout thresholds for various benchmarks on different architectures (sometimes with comments that it's done so we can run O0 on that particular benchmark). Something along these lines works: https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/ What do you guys think about this approach? Thanks, Diana PS: The buildbot is using the Makefiles because that's what our other AArch64 test-suite bots use. Moving all of them to CMake is a transition for another time. > At the moment, it lives in an internal buildmaster that I've...

...slucent. I think this is the best we can do for opacity support in old metacity themes. Once the new theme version lands in metacity [1], gwd will be updated to support it and I'm hoping that this new version will include support for real opacity. [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102547 -David

...per-bot basis, but I see some precedent for setting custom timeout thresholds for various benchmarks on different architectures (sometimes with comments that it's done so we can run O0 on that particular benchmark). Something along these lines works: https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/ What do you guys think about this approach? Looks reasonable to me. Thanks, Diana PS: The buildbot is using the Makefiles because that's what our other AArch64 test-suite bots use. Moving all of them to CMake is a transition for another time. _____________________________________________...

hi, I made a small a patch for gtk-window-decorator which define default border alpha to zero when it use metacity theme. That allows while playing with the alpha attributes of the metacity themes to have transparent borders. here too the modified ?Human Ubuntu? theme and a screenshot to show the result. ps: sorry for my bad english -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment

I played a little bit yesterday with adding metacity theme support to gwd and it looks like it's not going to be very hard. Hopefully I'll have it working in the next couple of days. What I've done is to rip out all the parts of the metacity code that is required for theme support (boxes.c, gradient.c, theme-parser.c, theme.c, util.c). Ideal would be if we could put this part of

...per-bot basis, but I see some precedent for setting custom timeout thresholds for various benchmarks on different architectures (sometimes with comments that it's done so we can run O0 on that particular benchmark). Something along these lines works: https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/ What do you guys think about this approach? Looks reasonable to me. Thanks, Diana PS: The buildbot is using the Makefiles because that's what our other AArch64 test-suite bots use. Moving all of them to CMake is a transition for another time. ____________________________________________...

...ut I see some precedent for setting custom timeout thresholds for various benchmarks on different architectures (sometimes with comments that it's done so we can run O0 on that particular benchmark). > > Something along these lines works: > https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/ <https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/> > > What do you guys think about this approach? > > Looks reasonable to me. > > > > Thanks, > Diana > > PS: The buildbot is using the Makefiles because that's what our other AArch64 test-suit...

...ut I see some precedent for setting custom timeout thresholds for various benchmarks on different architectures (sometimes with comments that it's done so we can run O0 on that particular benchmark). > > Something along these lines works: > https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/ <https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/> > > What do you guys think about this approach? > > Looks reasonable to me. > > > > Thanks, > Diana > > PS: The buildbot is using the Makefiles because that's what our other AArch64 test-suit...

...e precedent for setting custom timeout thresholds for various benchmarks on different architectures (sometimes with comments that it's done so we can run O0 on that particular benchmark). >> >> Something along these lines works: >> https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/ <https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/diff/102547/> >> >> What do you guys think about this approach? >> >> Looks reasonable to me. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> Diana >> >> PS: The buildbot is using the Makefiles because...

Thanks Kristof. Sounds like we'll need to investigate though I'd say it is not blocking the switch. At this point I think everybody is on board to flip the switch. @Eric, how does that sound to you? Thanks, Q > Le 1 juin 2017 à 07:46, Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com> a écrit : > > >> On 31 May 2017, at 17:07, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at

Hi all, I added a buildbot [1] running the test-suite with -O0 -global-isel. It runs into the same 2 timeouts that I reported previously on this thread (paq8p and scimark2). It would be nice to make it green before flipping the switch. At the moment, it lives in an internal buildmaster that I've setup for this purpose. If we fix it and it proves to be stable for a week or two, I'll move