search for: 100mbyte

On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > Stupid question: can't you do > > rpm -qa | grep ^kernel > > and then > > rpm -e <kernel file> With 100Mbyte /boot on a non-EFI system, I wouldn't have enough room for two kernels, so updates would be tricky. jh

>> How do i compile mbuffer for our system, Thanks to Mike Futerko for help with the compile, i now have it installed OK. >> and what syntax to i use to invoke it within the zfs send recv? Still looking for answers to this one? Any example syntax, gotchas etc would be much appreciated. -- Kind regards, Jules free. open. honest. love. kindness. generosity. energy. frenetic.

...ouble/ delete veto files = yes hide dot files = yes printing = BSD max protocol = SMB2 min protocol = SMB2 [projects] path = /W/Projects browseable = yes public = yes guest ok = yes read only = no force user = user force group = user The speed is fine with this configuration, around 100Mbyte/s. If I change protocol to NT1, the speed drops to around 50Mbyte/s. This is from man page: NT1: Current up to date version of the protocol. Used by Windows NT. Known as CIFS. SMB2: Re-implementation of the SMB protocol. Used by Windows Vista and newer. The Samba implementation of SMB2 is curre...

...00 to 700MByte/s. The gluster configuration files have no extra modifications, the disks are formatted with ext3 and created via: gluster volume create test stripe 16 transport rdma 10.1.0.4:/disk1 10.1.0.4:/disk2 ... 10.1.0.4:/disk16 Using DD to write/read from each of the disks gives me about 100MByte/s. Would there be anything obvious I'm missing? What would be causing this low reading speed? I tried playing with the performance parameters, setting up more or less cache and io-threads, but the results did not improve. Moreover, I have tested all the suggested optimization hacks/parameters...

...02900 ) a 5 meg file was sent but slowly and it took more than 10 seconds. With FireFox the same file was sent in 3 seconds or so. With FireFox a 20 meg file was sent in 9 seconds. With IE the same file could not be sent. ( for 5 mins client and rails server gave no responses ) Firefox can send a 100Mbyte file. According to MS ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/329781/en-us ), IE w/ modified registory ( 8kb -> 32 kb) can send a 100meg file but take looooong time. it seems that while uploading files, rails action "upload_file" was kept waiting, because there are no action log in the log...

Hello again guys, Iam trying to asses the best hardware for a machine that procceses a high number of packets per second on its NIC. THe only way I can achieve this without guesses is If iam able to understand or test what the number of interrupts available per core and how to translate that to PPS capabilities. So far ive been testing an Core I5 CPU and was able to achieve up to 400k

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Toralf Lund > Sent: den 12 oktober 2017 10:15 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [External] /boot partition too small > > >> Since a lot of people seem to say none of the above can be done, I'm > >> starting to feel

...e server that had excellent performance while providing Volume Management, but we felt that something like Veritas was overkill for our needs. Design Goals: - Redundant Hardware - Manual Failover (this was an acceptable solution) - Very large storage capacity (minimum 1 Terabyte) - Better than 100Mbyte/sec throughput - Volume Management, Journaled Filesystem - Drop-In Replacement for aging Win2k file server - Use existing admin tools to avoid retraining The proposed solution was a Samba file server running on a pair of redundant servers, with one connected to an eSATA raid box, with LVM and E...