Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "100baset4".
Did you mean:
100baset
2003 Apr 16
6
Slow connection
Hi,
Last week I discovered that my samba-server seems rather slow. When I
searched around I discovered that I wasn't the only one experiencing
this, but I didn't find a solution. I experimented a little, and I hope
someone can suggest a solution.
First my server : SuSE 8.1, with Samba 2.2.5 (comes with the distribution).
From a WinME-client I uploaded a 160Mb file to the samba-server.
1999 Oct 17
1
Pinging win from FreeBSD
...e output to look at:
>> ifconfig -a
pn0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet
192.168.1.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 87:ff:87:ff:87:ff
media: autoselect (10baseT/UTP <half-duplex>)
supported media: autoselect 100baseT4 100baseTX <full-duplex>
100baseTX <half-duplex> 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP
<half-duplex> 10baseT/UTP
lp0: flags=8810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
tun0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
ppp0: flags=8010<POINTOP...
1999 Oct 17
1
Ping win/FreeBSD probs
...:5e
HA!!!
'ifconfig -a' says:
pn0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 87:ff:87:ff:87:ff
media: autoselect (10baseT/UTP <half-duplex>)
supported media: autoselect 100baseT4 100baseTX <full-duplex>
100baseTX <half-duplex> 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex>
10baseT/UTP <half-duplex> 10baseT/UTP
That mac address is wrong!! I'm salivating now. Soooooo, how do I change the
mac address to the correct one? I tried
ifconfig pn0 addre...
2007 May 08
2
network interface cards with gig support
anyone know how to force network cards talk at gig speeds when all it
wants to do is establish a connection at 100mbits
root at host1 [/backup/cpbackup/daily]# mii-tool
eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok
eth1: negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5721
Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 11)
Subsystem: Broadcom
2012 Sep 14
1
Bonding Eth interfaces - unexpeceted results
CentOS 6.2.........
Why do the physical interfaces report (correctly) that they're negotiated at 1000Mb/s, but when I `cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0` I get 100Mbps for the member interfaces, and when I ` mii-tool bond0` I get 10Mbps for the bond?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ethtool em1
Settings for em1:
Supported ports: [
2003 Apr 14
1
em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting
...fecfd000-0xfecfdfff irq 2 at device 3.0 on pci0
fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:ac:c5:5c
inphy0: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus0
inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
ukphy0: <Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface> on miibus0
ukphy0: 10baseT, 100baseTX, 100baseT4, auto
ahc0: <Adaptec aic7895 Ultra SCSI adapter> port 0xf800-0xf8ff mem
0xfecff000-0xfecfffff irq 16 at device 9.0 on pci0
aic7895: Ultra Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs
ahc1: <Adaptec aic7895 Ultra SCSI adapter> port 0xf400-0xf4ff mem
0xfecfe000-0xfecfefff irq 16 at device 9.1...