search for: 10049

...e, that warning sometimes doesnt afect the call. in some cases the call is going and I maybe that messages IS AFTER hung up. What can be wrong here ? :s This is part of /var/log/asterisk/messages: DEBUG[9326] chan_iax2.c: Immediately destroying 1, having received hangup Sep 27 16:20:36 VERBOSE[10049] logger.c: == Spawn extension (default, 8600051, 1) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/172.22.0.5:4569-1' Sep 27 16:20:36 VERBOSE[10049] logger.c: -- Executing DeadAGI("IAX2/172.22.0.5:4569-1", "agi://127.0.0.1:4577/call_log") in new stack Sep 27 16:20:36 VERBOSE[10049] logg...

Hello I try to add a windows 10 client to a existent samba 3 domain. I have installed a windows 10 build 10049 with all Updates. On the windows client I added/modified the following Registry Keys that I can join to to the Samba 3 Domain. HKLM->System->CCS->LanmanWorkstation->Parameters DNSNameResolutionRequired = 0 DomainCompatibilityMode = 1 On the Samba Server I created the Folder Profile.V...

Hi list, Im using Samba 3.0.23d on a Debian Etch box. Its configured as a ADS member. wbinfo -u returns correct domain users wbinfo -g returns correct domain groups getent passwd returns all users. I.e #KIC\kicass:*:10049:10002:kic ass:/home/KIC/kicass:/bin/false getent group returns correctly. .I.e KIC\xcello:x:10016:KIC\mats Executing chown KIC\\kicass test.txt works. Executing chgrp KIC\\xcello test.txt returns "chgrp: invalid group name `KIC\\xcello'" Does anyone have any idea why users works...

...er [user1] -> [user1] -> [DOMNAME\user1] suceeded [2010/04/20 16:09:21, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(323) Allowed connection from (10.9.0.62) [2010/04/20 16:09:21, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(1033) client1 (10.9.0.62) connect to service DatabaseBackup initially as user backu (uid=10049, gid=10049) (pid 21909) =================================================================== I can provide plenty more information if it would help diagnose the situation. Does anyone have an idea of how I can get this to work? I'm sure it's possible, since the exact scenario worked in a...

I'm seeing the following errors on my SAMBA printserver in the winbindd log : [2005/03/03 14:56:53, 3, pid=3736] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwuid(225) [24610]: getpwuid 10140 [2005/03/03 14:56:53, 3, pid=3736] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwuid(225) [29198]: getpwuid 10266 [2005/03/03 14:56:54, 3, pid=3736] nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_ping(238) [ 6364]: ping

...ox ! Not modal yet. err:ole:CoUninitialize CoUninitialize() - not CoInitialized. fixme:shell:IShellLinkA_fnSetShowCmd (0x41deaf30)->(showcmd=1) err:module:MODULE_LoadLibraryExA Loading of native DLL C:\SIERRA\Half-Life\valve.ico failed (error 193), check this file. err:win:WIN_FindWndPtr window 10049 belongs to other process err:win:WIN_FindWndPtr window 10049 belongs to other process any help would be appreciated, mike

Hi, Earlier this year I "upgraded" from wine 20010510 to 20011226 in order to see if some kind of resource leak was fixed which caused screen redraws to get progressively slower and slower and slower and slower, .... That was fixed but there seemed to be a significant number of graphics and UI regressions. I've just upgraded to 20020228 to see if things were any better and within

...tion. The issue is that for most of the members of a Samba share it is not possible to connect this Samba share. This because of the error below. It seems to be that the number of Active Directory groups where this Samba member belongs to is too high. UNIX token of user 588109 Primary group is 10049 and contains 188 supplementary groups [2010/10/04 14:12:22.682600, 0] lib/util.c:1465(smb_panic) PANIC (pid 14999610): sys_setgroups failed [2010/10/04 14:12:22.682922, 0] lib/util.c:1619(log_stack_trace) unable to produce a stack trace on this platform [2010/10/04 14:12:22.683121, 0] lib...

Can anyone help me?? I validate a form-field: protected def validate errors.add(:name, "should be longer than 2 chars") unless name.length <= 2 end I want to check the variable name. It should have a size over 2 characters. But my function "validate" doesn''t run! Why ??? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 10:18 +0200, EnoSupp wrote: > Hello > I try to add a windows 10 client to a existent samba 3 domain. > I have installed a windows 10 build 10049 with all Updates. > On the windows client I added/modified the following Registry Keys that > I can join to to the Samba 3 Domain. > HKLM->System->CCS->LanmanWorkstation->Parameters > DNSNameResolutionRequired = 0 > DomainCompatibilityMode = 1 > On the Samba Server I...

...6849 1 ip6_tables 18053 1 ip6table_filter x_tables 17349 8 ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat,ipt_REJECT,xt_state,ip_tables,ip6t_REJECT,xt_tcpudp,ip6_tables dm_multipath 22089 0 video 21193 0 sbs 18533 0 backlight 10049 1 video i2c_ec 9025 1 sbs button 10705 0 battery 13637 0 asus_acpi 19289 0 ac 9157 0 ipv6 258145 27 ip6t_REJECT xfrm_nalgo 13765 1 ipv6 crypto_api 11969 1 xfrm_nalgo p...

...u) default_pass_scheme = PLAIN Unfortunately, LMTP accepts mail for *all* users, even for those users, that doesn't exist in LDAP at all: 010-08-04 12:27:58 auth: Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/auth 2010-08-04 12:27:58 auth: Debug: auth client connected (pid=10049) 2010-08-04 12:27:58 lmtp(10054): Debug: none: root=, index=, control=, inbox= 2010-08-04 12:27:58 auth: Debug: master in: USER 1 tessdfdfgdsft at example.org service=lmtp lip=(null) r ip=(null) 2010-08-04 12:27:58 auth: Debug: ldap(tessdfdfgdsft at example.org,0.0.0.0...

On 4/8/2019 4:55 PM, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote: > On 8 Apr 2019, at 16:35, Shawn Heisey via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: >> I would like to create a sieve rule where I do a regex match on ALL headers, not a specific header. > > This is a really bad idea. Headers can be quite long, contain data that you do not have control over, and checking all headers will be very

...host msdfs = yes # Winbind # idmap uid = 30000-40000 idmap gid = 30000-40000 template shell = /bin/bash winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes ServerB's /var/log/samba/log.winbindd log shows [2008/07/17 12:12:18, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_ping(470) [10049]: ping [2008/07/17 12:15:44, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(491) [10059]: request interface version [2008/07/17 12:15:44, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(524) [10059]: request location of privileged pipe [2008/07/17 12:15:44, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_group...

Hi, I have the Cisco PIX 506 firewall right in front of the asterisk and I am getting a one-way audio. I need your help/guidance to resolve this problem. I have the "fixups" disabled for SIP in the Cisco PIX 506. Any help rendered by you in this subject is greatly appreciated. I have been breaking my head trying to resolve this problem for more than one month. I have included the

How can I tell if this is normal behaviour? Oracle imports are horribly slow, an order of magnitude slower than on the same hardware with a slower disk array and Solaris 9. What I can look for to see where the problem lies? The server is 99% idle right now, with one database running. Each sample is about 5 seconds. I''ve tried setting kernel parameters despite the docs saying that

I went to reload (iptables-restore) my iptables configuration and obtained an error at the COMMIT statement. No further details were provided even when I ran restore with the -v option. I determined that none of my backed up configuration files going back to October will load either. This is more than passing strange because I altered and uploaded the iptables configuration on this host several

Hi, I am seeing the following (with Dovecot 1.0 rc10): Oct 18 07:35:58 dovecot: IMAP(user): UIDs broken with partial sync in mbox file /var/mail/user Oct 18 07:35:58 dovecot: IMAP(user): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox /var/mail/user (15314 > 9604, seq=5, idx_msgs=224) Oct 18 07:35:59 dovecot: IMAP(user): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 405 (mbox_sync_read_and_move): assertion

Hi, I am trying to get faster search results on our webmail client(Roundcube). Besides using Lucene for FTS are there other options? Would having all mails indexed give fast results? Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed how much faster are we looking at? Really appreciate if someone could advise about this. Thanks Kevin

...9611 9612 9613 9618 9619 9625 9627 9641 9642 9659 9685 9694 9735 9737 9772 9773 9774 9775 9776 9777 9781 9795 9802 9803 9806 9827 9829 9844 9866 9867 9875 9914 9949 9954 9957 9958 9959 9960 9961 9962 9967 9968 9969 9970 9986 9987 9988 9996 10003 10004 10006 10037 10040 10041 10043 10044 10046 10048 10049 10053 10072 10107 10121 10132 10136 10138 10140 10142 10143 10144 10146 10158 10276 10306 10336 10343 10353 10366 10389 10390 10400 10401 10413 10421 10429 10511 10709 10710 10711 10712 10713 10714 10715 10717 10719 10720 10728 10778 10779 10799 10800 10801 10819 10823 10829 10830 10850 10853 10857...