Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1000153".
Did you mean:
1000103
2008 Jul 21
2
[LLVMdev] ComputeMaskedBits Bug
On Saturday 19 July 2008 23:53, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> > That said, there are many places that don't respect the Mask. Closer
> > reading of the comment leads me to believe the Mask is simply a
> > time-saving device, not a correctness-enforcing mechanism.
>
> That's fine, but if you fix it that way, please audit
> InstructionCombiner SimplifyDemandedBits, which