Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "10.95".
Did you mean:
0.95
2012 Mar 28
1
CI with confint
Hello all,
I'm trying to use confint from the MASS package to compute confidence
intervals for an nls object. When I plot the results, however, they don't
make sense - lines cross over the fitted model or just don't match the
data. Code is :
Thanks for help
dat<-data.frame(a,b)
with(dat, plot(a,b))
model<-(nls(b~(1/exp(a*x))*n, data=dat, start=list(x=.001,n=20),
2011 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
Hi Bob, are these performance regressions real? They look pretty serious.
Ciao, Duncan.
On 10/12/11 09:40, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>
> bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
>
> URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/332/
> Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4
> Name curlew.apple.com
>
> Run ID Order Start Time End Time
>
2012 Nov 05
1
custom function & missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
I can't figure out why this function wont work.
#Custom Function used
fallInBand <- function(x){
#Assume the bands fall go up form 0 to 100 in intervals of 5 then from 100
to 1000 in intervals of 100.
#returns the location (band number)
if (is.na(x) == FALSE) {
if(x < 100) {#bands of 5
if((x %% 5) >=0){#falls within the band
Result = as.integer(x/5)+1
2011 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
Yes, they are real. I re-ran the two tests with the biggest execution time regressions, and the results were completely reproducible.
On Oct 12, 2011, at 1:24 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Bob, are these performance regressions real? They look pretty serious.
>
> Ciao, Duncan.
>
> On 10/12/11 09:40, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>>
>>
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:16 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > > Ralf, et al.,
> > >
> > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev
> > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains
> >
2011 Oct 29
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > Ralf, et al.,
> >
> > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev
> > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains
> > additional benchmark results.
> >
> > First, these are preliminary
2010 Jan 12
5
Get Me Outta Here! Web site security issue
Hi All,
I have a CentOS 5.4 web server. I have some stuff that runs on 443.
When I hit https://<the site>
The user gets a warning saying that site identity could not be verified and the user can add an exception if they want.
How do I stop this from happing? Do I need to buy an SSL cert? Aren't these really expensive per server and I have 5 servers I would need to do this too.
Can
2010 Jan 27
6
Installing an SSL Cert
HI All,
I am considering buying this:
http://www.godaddy.com/Compare/gdcompare_ssl.aspx?isc=sslqgo003a
Since I have a domain that will be collecting data and processing payments.
Where can I find instructions on how to install the certificate?
Do I have to run another domain or sub domain for the store? Or can I just run the whole domain on https?
Thanks,
-Jason
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote:
> Ralf, et al.,
>
> Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev
> has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains
> additional benchmark results.
>
> First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things
> necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the
2005 May 15
1
can't CLI> STOP NOW by zombie MOH
I am using CVS-v1-0-04/20/05-12:31:26. Windows Messenger5.1 works MOH
fine. After I stop MOH on Windows Messenger, if the hungup signal could
not send to *, the sip channel(e.g.,SIP/52001-08ca) for this MOH remains.
Then the user trys again MOH, a new sip channel starts. And again
the hugup signal can not send to *,.........
When I 'stop now' from CLI> , * cleanups the remaining sip
2011 Oct 29
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
Ralf, et al.,
Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev
has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains
additional benchmark results.
First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things
necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the machine, bind the
processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for
discussion.
2003 Nov 02
1
FW: NAT router and off-premise SIP audio problem
Rich, thank you for your informative reply. I checked with our admin and he
replied:
"I setup from the start "nat=yes" and "canreinvite=no" on sip phones from
Internet and modified the rtp channels (voice ports) and the rtp
port on the phones. Still have the same problem, no sound."
Perhaps the VPN solution is something we should try but this is more
limiting than
2009 Jan 18
6
read a xls file
Hello,
i have a xls file. I will read it in r, what library-command i use for
this??
any ideas??
Thanks
Michele
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2012 Oct 24
4
Z score
Hi,
I need to find the z-score of the data present in a speardsheet. The values
needs to be calculated for each gene across the samples (refer the
example). And, it should be a simple thing, but I am unable to do it right
now !
The example re the structure of the spreadsheet is -
# Example:
MyFile <- read.csv( text=
"Names,'Sample_1','Sample_2','Sample_3'
2013 Jun 01
3
[LLVMdev] Polyhedron 2005 results for dragonegg 3.3svn
Hi Jack,
On 29/05/13 22:04, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
>> Hi Jack, I pulled the loop vectorizer and fast math changes into the 3.3 branch,
>> so hopefully they will be part of 3.3 rc3 (and 3.3 final!). It would be great
>> if you could redo the benchmarks rc3.
>>
>
> Duncan,
> As requested, appended
2005 May 10
2
skype channel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I just noticed that the Skype API for linux seems to be available.
I've read before a number of posts where people were talking about
implementing a chan_skype with the skype API.
I wonder if there is any progress in that direction, and if anyone is
working on it.
/B
- --
* GPG-Key: http://evil.gnarf.org/mrbk.pgp
A: Because we read from top to
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote:
> The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
> http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
>
> [...]
>
> 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source.
> Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite
> (make TEST=nightly report).
>
> Send
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
G'Day Tanya,
Is it too late to bring in the following patches to fix some major
brokenness in the AuroraUX tool chain for 2.6?
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84468&r2=84469&view=diff&pathrev=84469
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp?r1=84265&r2=84266&view=diff&pathrev=84266
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
On Oct 20, 2009, at 6:02 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Tanya,
>
>> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
>> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
>> compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
>
> I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
> Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
>
Ok.