Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "1.9m".
Did you mean:
1.9
2020 Feb 24
0
Problem with swap?
Hello,
today i typed "htop" for controlling my ressources. I could see that my
swap is neraly 100%. This problem occurs since start of the server,
about 3 year ago. Its not a critical issue for me, because the server is
running fine. Several times i incereased the size of swap.
Today 9,3GB of 10GB swap are allocated (33 day uptime). My system is
still running and i have no
2011 Jan 29
2
How to make a bootable USB flash drive manually?
I would like to boot Ubuntu 8.04 i386 from my USB flash drive. I was
guided by this tutorial:
http://syslinux.zytor.com/wiki/index.php/HowTos#How_to_Create_a_Bootable_USB:_For_Linux
I took following steps:
1) made sure that usb_storage.ko kernel module is loaded
root at martin-desktop:~# lsmod | grep -i storage
usb_storage 39585 1
root at martin-desktop:~#
2) inserted USB flash
2008 Jan 23
1
FreeBSD 6.3-Release + squid 2.6.17 = Hang process.
Hi:
We have a machine running 6.2-R-p10 and squid 2.6.17,
and upgrade it to 6.3R yesterday,
but squid will hang and eat 100% cpu time after restart about 1 hour later,
machine still alive, and no response from squid.
downgrade to 6.2-R-p10, everything ok again..
here is some infomations:
machine type:
FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE #0: Wed Jan 23 01:58:39 CST 2008
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
2007 Feb 01
2
Indexing Performance Question (was tpop3d vs dovecot)
Since posting the previous thread we've setup a new system (Opteron
2.0ghz, 1gb ram, Fedora 6) for testing. I am hoping somebody very
familiar with the indexing portion of dovecot can shed some light on
this for me.
After much testing, I've come to one primary conclusion that dovecot
is possibly unnecessarily scanning or reading files within the
maildir directories. Take a mailbox
2009 Oct 10
2
Cross compiling - size of binaries is large
Hi,
I have cross compiled samba 3.3.8 for arm, which succeeded.
However, the size of the resulting binaries is large (few MB's per binary) so
the total installation of samba sums to over 50 megabytes, after stripping the
binaries.
For example, with samba 2.0.10, the size of smbd was 281 KB. With samba 3.3.8
that is 5.2 MB. Same goes for the other binaries. It looks as if there is a
chunk of
2018 Mar 01
29
[Bug 13317] New: rsync returns success when target filesystem is full
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13317
Bug ID: 13317
Summary: rsync returns success when target filesystem is full
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: x64
OS: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
2008 Jul 24
2
You didn't give me some packages, so now I'm giving you some! R, TexLive, LyX, Gnumeric, etc.
I want up-to-dateish versions of TexLive, R, gnumeric, emacs, but on a
more-or-less stable base of Centos-5.2. I asked for packages in this,
but got no answers. So now I've built them and will let you try them
if you want. I used the source packages from Fedora 8 and 9.
I wanted TexLive because many of us have jumped ship to Ubuntu Linux
8.04 and it does offer TexLive, and the compatability
2016 Jun 27
5
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs?
Please have a look at the dedicated mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/
Please wait for the official release to happen, you will then find tarballs on
llvm.org. They will also contain correct version strings, though I haven't yet
tried building from the SVN branches directly. Maybe you need to use the SVN
tags, $ clang --version currently gives me "clang
2019 Apr 30
6
Disk space and RAM requirements in docs
Hi,
Have anybody recently built LLVM in Debug mode /within/ space
requirements from the Getting Started doc?
https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#hardware
> An LLVM-only build will need about 1-3 GB of space. A full build of
LLVM and Clang will need around 15-20 GB of disk space.
From my experience this numbers looks drastically low. On FreeBSD my
recent builds consumed more than
2004 Nov 17
9
serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem
Dear best guys,
I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates,
after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve
my performance problem (*laugh*):
(In short, see *** below)
Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI
Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device