Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1838 matches for "1.9".
Did you mean:
1.0
2006 Apr 11
9
Rails failure after upgrade to 1.1.2
Greetings,
I tried upgrading Rails to 1.1.2 and now nothing is really working. In
connection to the Rails upgrade I upgraded my Ruby version to 1.9.0. I
also upgraded all my gem installs.
Since my old rails apps stopped working I tried generating a fresh one
, alas with the same result. Below I included the full trace when
trying to reach the app. Line 3 in application.rb is :
class
2006 Dec 03
3
[LLVMdev] problem building gcc4 front end on fedora core 5
I'm getting a build error when trying to build gcc4 from sources. This is
for the recent 1.9 release.
How I built llvm-1.9:
-----------------------------
tar zxf llvm-1.9.tar.gz
cd llvm-1.9/
./configure --prefix=/custom/llvm-1.9
make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 OPTIMIZE_OPTION='-O2' tools-only
make install
How I built gcc4:
-----------------------------
export
2009 Jan 21
1
[LLVMdev] Errors while building and installation of llvm-1.9
I have downloaded the llvm-1.9 from the following link
http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#1.9
There are some header files missing and I am getting some compilation errors
of the source code when I compiled the llvm-1.9.
Can you please send me the correct source code.
I am getting the following errors when I compiled the llvm-1.9 on
linux-ubuntu with the following command.
make -k | tee
2007 Jul 28
1
Error when using the cat function
Is the following developed in my console output a recognized bug or am I using the cat function incorrectly?
Thanks,
Stan
> ifelse(class(data[[n]])!="factor",{print("yes")},{print("no")})
[1] "yes"
[1] "yes"
> ifelse(class(data[[n]])!="factor",{cat("yes")},{cat("no")})
yesError in ans[test & !nas] <-
2012 Mar 14
5
Does Ruby 1.9 support Unicode normalization yet?
In the process of upgrading from 1.8 to 1.9 we are getting a lot of
warnings about "Ruby 1.9 doesn''t support Unicode normalization yet".
However the commit that added those lines is from 2008 and just
mentions "Ruby 1.9 compat: no Unicode normalization support yet"
without any references. Does anyone know whether this is still true
for ruby 1.9 and for which minor
2007 Apr 01
3
[LLVMdev] trouble compiling llvm-gcc4 1.9
I'm having some trouble getting llvm-gcc4 to compile. It's unable to
compile darwin-crt3.c. It's mentioning "Complex expression. Absolute
segment assumed." but I'm not sure if that's a real error message. Has
anyone run into this before? I'm running on a G4 apple 10.4.8, kernel
version 8.6.0. I googled around and found a bug with the same error message:
2006 Nov 25
1
[LLVMdev] mingw binary is corrupt
Chris,
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 11:39 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> > Hello, Matthew.
> >> Someone reported this earlier but the situation remains unchanged.
> > I'm sorry for delay. Files will be uploaded to LLVM download section
> > soon.
>
> Anton, you have commit access to the web page. Please just check
2011 Dec 22
0
CESA-2011:1790 Moderate CentOS 6 krb5 Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1790 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1790.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
c175d1f00ab800eac3a1ddcee8c32c7cdaf4860fd7607e6cf33abcf5ca2a8a94 krb5-devel-1.9-22.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
2012 Jul 31
0
CESA-2012:1131 Important CentOS 6 krb5 Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1131 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1131.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
91e2684e2ba585f1a75160c01aef49192408f9861d8827e6a6dec24518a93c52 krb5-devel-1.9-33.el6_3.2.i686.rpm
2012 Sep 19
0
CEBA-2012:1294 CentOS 6 krb5 Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1294
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1294.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
bddbfdc239fd2988eb95cccaf70621f82953f6ae9b6c30b6a2dd90509cb41369 krb5-devel-1.9-33.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
2007 Feb 21
2
[LLVMdev] Trouble with sample project's autoconf
I'm trying to follow docs/Projects.html to use llvm in a project of my own.
If I just copy the sample directory, running configure in the new one
works fine:
~/programming/llvm-1.9/projects $ cp -a sample/ zhe
~/programming/llvm-1.9/projects $ cd zhe/
~/programming/llvm-1.9/projects/zhe $ ./configure
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile.common
config.status:
2017 Jul 28
1
Error in `row.names<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`, value = c("1.9", "1.9", "1.9", : duplicate 'row.names' are not allowed
Hi,
Can someone explain this error below,
I don't understand why the 2 int columns are associated to make a row name
> horse1.data<-read.csv("cte2.csv", header=TRUE, sep=";")
> h1.dat<-mlogit.data(data=horse1.data,choice="win",chid.var="raceid",alt.var="nbChev",shape="long")
Error in `row.names<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`,
2017 Aug 02
0
Error in `row.names<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`, value = c("1.9", "1.9", "1.9", : duplicate 'row.names' are not allowed
Hi
I did not notice any answer to your question so I try. After studying docs and other responses to similar question I deduct that chid.var and alt.var are mixed together and new data frame is being build with chid.var and alt.var combination as new row names. As the combination is not unique this operation results to error.
But I may be completely wrong.
Cheers
Petr
> -----Original
2007 Mar 01
3
[LLVMdev] compiling llvm-gcc4 on ubuntu
hello,
i am new to llvm and can't manage to compile the gcc backend.
my steps:
i compile the llvm-source first as suggested in "README.LLVM"
that works fine and without any issues.
then i make a new dir called build. from there i do the following:
stefan at ubuntu:~/programs/llvm/build$ ../llvm-gcc4-1.9.source/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/usr/local/
2011 Feb 16
5
validates_inclusion_of with range on ruby 1.9
I found out today that Range#include? behaves differently on 1.9 than on 1.8 ( http://rhnh.net/2009/08/03/range-include-in-ruby-1-9 )
In order to deal with various edge cases, instead of just checking whether range.first <= value <= range.last, in ruby 1.9 include? steps through all the values in the range, checking for equality.
This is of course a lot slower - in my case, checking a date
2007 Dec 27
3
RSpec on Ruby 1.9: before(:all) (Not Yet Implemented) pending messages instead of tests
On Dec 27, 2007 3:18 PM, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) <shot at hot.pl> wrote:
> Shot (Piotr Szotkowski):
>
> > I happily hand-compiled Ruby 1.9.0-0 into /home/shot/opt/ruby today
> > and I''m running into a strange error with RSpec ? all my examples work
> > perfectly with Ruby 1.8 but are considered peding on Ruby 1.9.
>
> FWIW, I get the same result with
2007 Nov 18
18
mongrel and fastthread on ruby 1.9?
Is anybody testing mongrel on ruby 1.9. I just tried installing
mongrel on trunk 1.9 and trunk rubygems and got this error compiling
fastthread:
/Users/stephen/dev/ruby/1.9_trunk/bin/ruby extconf.rb install mongrel --no-rdoc
creating Makefile
make
gcc -I.
-I/Users/stephen/dev/ruby/1.9_trunk/include/ruby-1.9/i686-darwin8.10.1
-I/Users/stephen/dev/ruby/1.9_trunk/include/ruby-1.9 -I.
2007 Dec 26
3
ruby 1.9 / rails 2.0.2 problem...
just now i installed ruby 1.9 and rails 2.0.2 on it
when i create new rails application
username-hO7X3CQjxafZmfiEtUfXeA@public.gmane.org:~/project$ rails app
can''t convert Enumerable::Enumerator into Array
username-hO7X3CQjxafZmfiEtUfXeA@public.gmane.org:~/project$
how to solve it ? or did i make any mistake in installation process?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2007 Dec 23
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-16523 ] Ruby 1.9 gives warning
FYI - I''ve just released Mocha 0.5.6 to make Ruby 1.9 compatibility
fixes available for those using released packages rather than
subversion trunk. I''m not feeling well and so haven''t been able to
test it other than by running all the tests using Ruby 1.9. Please let
me know if you have any problems using it. Remember that it sometimes
takes a while for a new gem
2007 Dec 11
54
1.9
Hey so,
People are asking about Mongrel Ruby 1.9 compatibility. Isn''t the
point of 1.9 for library developers to have time to get ready for 2.0?
It''s not like 1.9 is a production release.
Evan
--
Evan Weaver
Cloudburst, LLC