search for: 1.151

In order to see how llvm-gcc-4.2 svn performs in code generation compared to the upcoming gcc 4.4, I ran the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks on a MacPro with the -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 optimization flags for both compilers. The results are summarized below. Ave Run (secs) Ave Run (secs) llvm-gcc-4.2/ Benchmark llvm-gcc-4.2 svn gcc trunk gcc trunk

Hello, my test.R file contains two huge arrays (>3000 entries), from which R needs to calculate the Pearson Correlation, if I look at the file the numbers look correct. if I run R R < test.R --no-save I see things like this: 0.723, 0.838, 1.002, 0.364, 0.357, 0.227, 0.982+ , 0.963, 0.535, 1.214, 1.270, 0.832, 1.033, 0.632, 2.482, 1.239, 0.743, 1.077, 0.962, 1.052, 1.075, 1.427, 1.395,

Ran a bunch of variables in R and the final result of StepAIC is as below: Why are the first 5 variables kept in the stepwise result?? Are the last 4 variables finally chosen after Stepwise? Thanks Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 1.315e-01 2.687e-01 0.490 0.63611 Core_CPI__ 1.290e-02 7.496e-03 1.721 0.11927 GDP_change -3.482e-03 2.075e-03 -1.678 0.12767

Hi all, The following patch fixes cross compiling from Linux to windows. The existing code was doing: #if !defined _MSC_VER && !defined __MINGW32__ && !defined __EMX__ #include <stdint.h> /* for SIZE_MAX in case limits.h didn't get it */ #endif when it seems to make much more sense to just test for the presence of <stdint.h> and do: #ifdef

The patch from 2-1/2 years ago for changing copy-unsafe-links to follow unsafe links on the destination side also included essentially this patch. When I looked at it, however, I asked why in the world is unsafe_symlink() doing strdup() in the first place. I think you could get rid of the calls to strdup() and the new local variables and possibly do a couple casts inside the function instead. -

On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > Currently, Structure layout is left to targets, which implement them > according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most > structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a > packed type must be converted to byte arrays with casts to access > fields, which bloats accesses and obsfucates the

Dear all, I'm trying to figure out the exact meaning of the B-spline coefficients generated by the R command bs(). After reading a lot of things, I still have no clue... Here's my data. > test time f0 1 1 94.76328 2 2 102.47954 3 3 105.01234 4 4 107.21387 5 5 108.63279 6 6 109.54507 7 7 113.87931 8 8 118.21356 9 9 121.08652 10

The 4.6p1 sshd is logging this error during remote commands or file transfers: error: channel 0: chan_read_failed for istate 3 Platform is Solaris 8, 4.6p1 + OpenSSL 0.9.8d. The commands and transfers work correctly, so the error message appears to be spurious. The error message does not appear when processing logins. Otherwise 4.6p1 is running without any apparent problems. This error

Currently, Structure layout is left to targets, which implement them according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a packed type must be converted to byte arrays with casts to access fields, which bloats accesses and obsfucates the types. First class support for packed types would clean up the generated code

Hello, I did a cross-validation using cvlm from DAAG package but wasn't sure how to assess the result. Does this result means my model is a good model? I understand that the overall ms is the mean of sum of squares. But is 0.0987 a good number? The response (i.e. gailRel5yr) has min,1st Quantile, median, mean and 3rd Quantile, and max as follows: (0.462, 0.628, 0.806, 0.896, 1.000, 2.400) ?

Hello I am using the step function in order to do backward selection for a linear model of 52 variables with the following commands: object<-lm(vars[,1] ~ (vars[,2:(ncol(predictors)+1)]-1)) BackS<-step(object,direction="backward") but it isn't dropping any if the variables in the model, but there are lots of not significant variables as you can see here >

I have a dataset like this: p aa index x y z sdx sdy sdz delta as ms cur sc 1 821p MET 1 -5.09688 32.8830 -5.857620 1.478200 1.73998 0.825778 13.7883 126.91 92.37 -0.1320180 111.0990 2 821p THR 2 -4.07357 28.6881 -4.838430 0.597674 1.37860 1.165780 13.7207 64.09 50.72 -0.0977129 98.5319 3 821p GLU 3 -5.86733 30.4759

Hi, We have upgraded the openssh 4.6P1 on Solaris 8 servers. After upgrade we get the below error message whenever we execute the remote commands using ssh. Please let me know what the fix is for this. Apr 8 03:03:43 dvsrv10 sshd[25379]: [ID 800047 auth.info] Accepted publickey for osteam from 10.0.93.31 port 35856 ssh2 Apr 8 03:03:50 dvsrv10 sshd[25381]: [ID 800047 auth.error] error: