search for: 1.0's

CentOS, RHEL, all versions. Suppose I am upgrading a package foo-1.0 to foo-2.0 (assume foo is not relocatable), and both packages have %preun sections in their .spec files. It appears that foo-1.0's %preun is run after foo-2.0 has been installed. So what happens if foo-1.0 needs to run a binary t...

Hi, all. I know that there's no official Dovecot 1.0-stable .deb, given Timo's recommendations. However, does anyone have even an "unofficial" deb of it for, say, Sarge? I want to use 1.0's ability to use both mbox and maildir; the latter is very helpful for dealing with mailing lists. Thanks in advance...

?hel kenal p?eval (neljap?ev, 14. m?rts 2013 19:02:35) kirjutas Declan Kelly: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:06:51PM -0400, benski at winamp.com wrote: > > Flake is a completely independent codebase. When I used it years ago, I > > remember it being not only better compression but significantly faster as > > well. I...

I would like to announce the release of Valin 3.0. The release "party" occurred on 16 December, but was restricted to only the two core developers and the release managers. The features are similar to the original Valin 2.0 release (which has evolved significantly since then), including: - 3.1 kg birth weight - 48 cm heigh...

Congratulations on inclusion in the Real Helix thing. :-) I do have a question, however. While I am very impressed by Vorbis 1.0's quality even down to "-1", vorbis seems very much a VBR format, which is great if the file lives on your hard drive, but a mixed bag for streaming over a modem conn...

> Be careful comparing these numbers. I see that we have a 23x speedup > today over GCC on the "burg" test, but we go from 0.093 -> 0.004s. :) > The shorter the test runs get, the more noisy they get, so unfortunately > we're not getting a realistic 23x speedup here. ;-) > [...] > These are e...

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > i was thinking that this question was not good > right after relese 1.0, but now perhaps it is OK... > if not, then I am sorry. You could always ask, it's just that the answer changes over time. :) > So, what about current status of benchmarks? > I mean comparison to gcc. It's slo...

Hi all, i was thinking that this question was not good right after relese 1.0, but now perhaps it is OK... if not, then I am sorry. So, what about current status of benchmarks? I mean comparison to gcc. I have looked at http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ Unfortunatelly graphs lines are hardly for hum...

On 14-03-13 20:16, Marko Uibo wrote: > One possibility is to broaden Flac subset. But I don't know is it good > idea or not. It's not a good idea, except when you want to ruin FLACs reputation. One of the reasons FLAC is (alongside ALAC) one of the two most popular lossless codecs is because of the well-defined subset. I've t...

Hey. I've noticed a severe lack of recent news updates on xiph.org and vorbis.com. Of course, I'm sure you can't name an exact date for version 1.0 due to development schedules and what not, but it'd be handy to have an easily accessible list somewhere of what major chunks of coding remain before Version 1....

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " wrote: > > This one is just noise, if you look today it's 1.0's straight across the > > board. Also note that the test runs for 0.003 seconds, which is the > > resolution of the time command on the system the program is being run on: > > this is not a good test for checking performance....

I don't think you guys should worry too much about messing up old decoders, but no matter what you choose to do FLAC MUST REMAIN LOSSLESS. On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 5:06 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To subscribe...

On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 11 November 2010 07:46, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> It's actually not any harder to change and keep up to date than anything else. HTML pages have the advantage of showing up in a recursive grep of the sourcebase, and showing up in llvm-commits so they fall into the peer review process. >...

On 11 November 2010 07:46, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > It's actually not any harder to change and keep up to date than anything else.  HTML pages have the advantage of showing up in a recursive grep of the sourcebase, and showing up in llvm-commits so they fall into the peer review process. Hi Chri...

Since your "1.1 plans" announcement somehow turned into everybody handing in a wish list . . . thought I'd start one by itself - since I expect a few people to have opinions on this matter. I'm aware of a plug-in functionality in Dovecot, and that a plug-in exists for dspam proc...

A long long time ago, I asked about the different tinc branches. Guus, you said at the time that * trunk is 1.0, bugfixes only * 1.0-gnutls, POKEY, and pre4-cube are stagnant * 2.0 is where new work should happen...at the time, it didn't compile, and it appears it still doesn't This answer discouraged me; I hav...

On Nov 10, 2010, at 3:58 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 10 November 2010 07:27, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> I'd like to do more similar ones in the future, and encourage other contributors to also write other blog entries in general. > > Hi Chris, > > After discussing these topics in the dev meeting, I also have some input. > &gt...

From: Robin Mordasiewicz <robin at bullseye.tv> > I have an excellent nvidia graphics card, I get excellent fps, all agp > features are installed correctly etc. In Windows or Linux? And by "all agp features are installed correctly," what do you mean and how are you getting this? > When I...