search for: 0xf0

...ible recursive locking detected ] > [ 0.633618] 3.9.0-rc1 #2 Not tainted > [ 0.633619] --------------------------------------------- > [ 0.633619] swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: > [ 0.633623] (&dmac->lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8141bb53>] evo_wait+0x43/0xf0 > [ 0.633624] > [ 0.633624] but task is already holding lock: > [ 0.633626] (&dmac->lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8141bb53>] evo_wait+0x43/0xf0 > [ 0.633626] > [ 0.633626] other info that might help us debug this: > [ 0.633626] Possible unsafe loc...

...xe0/0xe0 [virtio_net] > > [ 310.018759] ? packet_rcv+0x20d0/0x20d0 > > [ 310.019950] ? dev_queue_xmit_nit+0x5cd/0xaf0 > > [ 310.021168] start_xmit+0x1b4/0x1b10 [virtio_net] > > [ 310.022413] ? default_device_exit+0x2d0/0x2d0 > > [ 310.023634] ? virtnet_remove+0xf0/0xf0 [virtio_net] > > [ 310.024874] ? update_load_avg+0x1281/0x29f0 > > [ 310.026059] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1ea/0x7f0 > > [ 310.027247] ? validate_xmit_skb_list+0x100/0x100 > > [ 310.028470] ? validate_xmit_skb+0x7f/0xc10 > > [ 310.029731] ? netif_skb_feature...

...xe0/0xe0 [virtio_net] > > [ 310.018759] ? packet_rcv+0x20d0/0x20d0 > > [ 310.019950] ? dev_queue_xmit_nit+0x5cd/0xaf0 > > [ 310.021168] start_xmit+0x1b4/0x1b10 [virtio_net] > > [ 310.022413] ? default_device_exit+0x2d0/0x2d0 > > [ 310.023634] ? virtnet_remove+0xf0/0xf0 [virtio_net] > > [ 310.024874] ? update_load_avg+0x1281/0x29f0 > > [ 310.026059] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1ea/0x7f0 > > [ 310.027247] ? validate_xmit_skb_list+0x100/0x100 > > [ 310.028470] ? validate_xmit_skb+0x7f/0xc10 > > [ 310.029731] ? netif_skb_feature...

With lightweight desktoping, the atomic modesetting seems far from robust. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000021 IP: dma_fence_wait_timeout+0x36/0xf0 ... Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: ... nouveau ... CPU: 0 PID: 6895 Comm: Xorg Not tainted 4.10.5-1001.fc24.x86_64 #1 ... Call Trace: drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_fences+0x48/0x120 [drm_kms_helper] nv50_disp_atomic_commit+0x19c/0x2a0 [nouveau] drm_atomic_commit+0x4b/0x50 [drm] drm_atomic_...

...ffffff810a7e90>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x30/0x30 [ 1920.052257] [<ffffffffa0054b49>] ? jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0xe79/0x1950 [jbd2] [ 1920.052320] [<ffffffff8100331e>] ? xen_end_context_switch+0xe/0x20 [ 1920.052327] [<ffffffff810912f6>] ? finish_task_switch+0x46/0xf0 [ 1920.052331] [<ffffffff815141a3>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x13/0x20 [ 1920.052338] [<ffffffffa0058be2>] ? kjournald2+0xb2/0x240 [jbd2] [ 1920.052341] [<ffffffff810a7e60>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0 [ 1920.052347] [<ffffffffa0058b30>] ? commit_timeout+0x10/...

...r/local/libexec/nut/solis inside freenas, with the patches that I have > posted in the forum: Dear guys, Following your suggestions I was able to make NUT recognize my UPS model. Actually, the only modification I had to introduce in solis.c was to change this line: if( ( (RecPack[0] & 0xF0) == 0xA0 ) to if( ( (RecPack[0] & 0xF0) == 0xA0 || (RecPack[0] & 0xF0) == 0xB0 ) Unfortunately some important information, as for instance the battery charge, do not work (e.g., battery charge is always zero). But at least now I have access to whether the UPS is on battery or not....

...+ + if (!str[0]) + syslinux_run_default(); + else + syslinux_run_command(str); +} + +/* This function copyright H. Peter Anvin */ +static const char *bootloadername(uint8_t id) +{ + static const struct { + uint8_t id, mask; + const char *name; + } *lp, list[] = { + {0x00, 0xf0, "LILO"}, + {0x10, 0xf0, "LOADLIN"}, + {0x31, 0xff, "SYSLINUX"}, + {0x32, 0xff, "PXELINUX"}, + {0x33, 0xff, "ISOLINUX"}, + {0x34, 0xff, "EXTLINUX"}, + {0x30, 0xf0, "Syslinux family"}, + {0x40, 0xf0, "Eth...

...;ffffffffa00c887c>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x220 [btrfs] [ 386.318472] [<ffffffffa00cc9f8>] btrfs_search_slot+0x368/0x740 [btrfs] [ 386.318502] [<ffffffffa00d32de>] lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x8e/0x4c0 [btrfs] [ 386.318532] [<ffffffffa00d3770>] lookup_extent_backref+0x60/0xf0 [btrfs] [ 386.318561] [<ffffffffa00d5c55>] __btrfs_free_extent+0xb5/0x670 [btrfs] [ 386.318592] [<ffffffffa00d6324>] run_delayed_tree_ref+0x114/0x190 [btrfs] [ 386.318623] [<ffffffffa00dac2e>] run_one_delayed_ref+0xde/0xf0 [btrfs] [ 386.318654] [<ffffffffa00dad76>] r...

The following 2 patches make it possible to run Mesa programs on GK20A (Tegra K1). GK20A is very similar to GK104, but uses a new (backward-compatible) 3D class as well as the same ISA as GK110 (SM35). Taking these differences into account is sufficient to successfully render simple off-screen buffers. Alexandre Courbot (2): nvc0: add GK20A 3D class nvc0: use SM35 ISA with GK20A

...0 [ 162.435982] lock_acquire+0x48/0x68 [ 162.436678] _raw_read_lock+0x3c/0x50 [ 162.449520] jbd2_trans_will_send_data_barrier+0x44/0xc8 [ 162.450681] ext4_sync_file+0x1e0/0x330 [ 162.451535] vfs_fsync_range+0x48/0xc0 [ 162.452323] dio_complete+0x1fc/0x220 [ 162.453094] dio_bio_end_aio+0xf0/0x130 [ 162.453935] bio_endio+0xe8/0xf8 [ 162.454625] blk_update_request+0x80/0x2e8 [ 162.455450] blk_mq_end_request+0x20/0x70 [ 162.456240] virtblk_request_done+0x24/0x30 [ 162.457080] __blk_mq_complete_request+0x100/0x1b0 [ 162.458047] blk_mq_complete_request+0x60/0x98 [ 162.458918]...

...0 [ 162.435982] lock_acquire+0x48/0x68 [ 162.436678] _raw_read_lock+0x3c/0x50 [ 162.449520] jbd2_trans_will_send_data_barrier+0x44/0xc8 [ 162.450681] ext4_sync_file+0x1e0/0x330 [ 162.451535] vfs_fsync_range+0x48/0xc0 [ 162.452323] dio_complete+0x1fc/0x220 [ 162.453094] dio_bio_end_aio+0xf0/0x130 [ 162.453935] bio_endio+0xe8/0xf8 [ 162.454625] blk_update_request+0x80/0x2e8 [ 162.455450] blk_mq_end_request+0x20/0x70 [ 162.456240] virtblk_request_done+0x24/0x30 [ 162.457080] __blk_mq_complete_request+0x100/0x1b0 [ 162.458047] blk_mq_complete_request+0x60/0x98 [ 162.458918]...

...] [<ffffffff81279118>] ? bio_alloc_bioset+0x198/0x290 [ 1680.060275] [<ffffffffa001172c>] ? jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0xa5c/0x1950 [jbd2] [ 1680.060283] [<ffffffff8100331e>] ? xen_end_context_switch+0xe/0x20 [ 1680.060292] [<ffffffff810912f6>] ? finish_task_switch+0x46/0xf0 [ 1680.060297] [<ffffffff815141a3>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x13/0x20 [ 1680.060304] [<ffffffffa0015be2>] ? kjournald2+0xb2/0x240 [jbd2] [ 1680.060309] [<ffffffff810a7e60>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0 [ 1680.060314] [<ffffffffa0015b30>] ? commit_timeout+0x10/0x10...

They can be easy to reproduce, if you try to unload virtio-net Andrey Vagin (2): virtio-net: determine type of bufs correctly virtio: delete napi objects from netdev before releasing memory drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com>

They can be easy to reproduce, if you try to unload virtio-net Andrey Vagin (2): virtio-net: determine type of bufs correctly virtio: delete napi objects from netdev before releasing memory drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com>

...BUILTIN(__builtin_x86_max_qb, "iii", "") I define the intrinsic as Pseudo instruction,it succeed. But when mapping a new instruction.I don't know how to do. In x86InstrArithmetic.td. I add ,(To make sure the Sched is right, I use the WriteIMul16Reg ) def max_qb : I<0xF0,MRMSrcReg, (outs GR32:$dst), (ins GR32:$src1,GR32:$src2), "max_qb\t {$dst, $src1,$src2}", [(set GR32:$dst,(X86max_qb GR32:$src1, GR32:$src2))]>,Sched<[WriteIMul16Reg]>,OpSize32 ; when compile LLVM , the error appears. "[ 97%] Updating X86GenAsmWriter1.inc... Unhandled im...

Hello Charles and Douglas, I really believe that BZ2200-BR model is the same as mine BZ1200-BR, with different capacity. If you see the BZ2200-BR specs you will notice the manufacturer "APC-Microsol". Those no-breaks have a USB port in it, but in fact it is a serial<->usb cable, usually uses the port "/dev/cuaU0". In mine, the serial<->usb chip is from FTDI, and

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 11:17:27 -0700, Computerisms Corporation via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > This occurred again this morning, when the user reported the problem, I > found in the ctdb logs that vacuuming has been going on since last > night. The need to fix it was urgent (when isn't it?) so I didn't have > time to poke around for clues, but immediately

...org Got this in the syslog today: VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:1182 Call Trace: [<c014c345>] __brelse+0x35/0x40 [<c0180efe>] ext3_htree_fill_tree+0x14e/0x240 [<c017a809>] ext3_dx_readdir+0x99/0x1e0 [<c015b390>] filldir64+0x0/0xf0 [<c017a3f5>] ext3_readdir+0x465/0x490 [<c015b390>] filldir64+0x0/0xf0 [<c01d5258>] __blk_put_request+0xd8/0x110 [<c01d320f>] elv_queue_empty+0x1f/0x30 [<c01e8d8c>] choose_drive+0x1c/0x190 [<c01e844a>] ide_do_request+0x3a/0x290 [<c015b0ca>] vfs_readdi...

...+0x48/0x68 > [ 162.436678] _raw_read_lock+0x3c/0x50 > [ 162.449520] jbd2_trans_will_send_data_barrier+0x44/0xc8 > [ 162.450681] ext4_sync_file+0x1e0/0x330 > [ 162.451535] vfs_fsync_range+0x48/0xc0 > [ 162.452323] dio_complete+0x1fc/0x220 > [ 162.453094] dio_bio_end_aio+0xf0/0x130 > [ 162.453935] bio_endio+0xe8/0xf8 > [ 162.454625] blk_update_request+0x80/0x2e8 > [ 162.455450] blk_mq_end_request+0x20/0x70 > [ 162.456240] virtblk_request_done+0x24/0x30 > [ 162.457080] __blk_mq_complete_request+0x100/0x1b0 > [ 162.458047] blk_mq_complete_req...

...(original) > +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrSSE.td Thu May 26 18:13:19 2011 > @@ -4935,66 +4935,66 @@ > // This set of instructions are only rm, the only difference is the size > // of r and m. > let Constraints = "$src1 = $dst" in { > - def CRC32m8 : SS42FI<0xF0, MRMSrcMem, (outs GR32:$dst), > + def CRC32r32m8 : SS42FI<0xF0, MRMSrcMem, (outs GR32:$dst), > (ins GR32:$src1, i8mem:$src2), > "crc32{b} \t{$src2, $src1|$src1, $src2}", > [(set GR32:$dst, > -...