search for: 0x18

...zero in the call instruction: > > 0000000000013832 <func>: > 13832: 55 push %rbp > 13833: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > 13836: 53 push %rbx > 13837: 48 83 ec 18 sub $0x18,%rsp > 1383b: 48 89 7d e8 mov %rdi,-0x18(%rbp) > 1383f: 48 8b 45 e8 mov -0x18(%rbp),%rax > 13843: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi > -> 13846: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 1384b <func+0x19> > 1384b:...

...xd }, { 0xa, 0xb, 0xc, 0xe }, { 0xb, 0xc, 0xd, 0xf }, { 0xc, 0xd, 0xe, 0x10 }, { 0xd, 0xe, 0xf, 0x11 }, { 0xe, 0xf, 0x10, 0x12 }, { 0xf, 0x10, 0x11, 0x13 }, { 0x10, 0x11, 0x12, 0x14 }, { 0x11, 0x12, 0x13, 0x15 }, { 0x12, 0x13, 0x14, 0x16 }, { 0x13, 0x14, 0x15, 0x17 }, { 0x14, 0x15, 0x16, 0x18 }, { 0x15, 0x16, 0x17, 0x19 }, { 0x16, 0x17, 0x18, 0x1a }, { 0x17, 0x18, 0x19, 0x1b }, { 0x18, 0x19, 0x1a, 0x1c }, { 0x19, 0x1a, 0x1b, 0x1d }, { 0x1a, 0x1b, 0x1c, 0x1e }, { 0x1b, 0x1c, 0x1d, 0x1f }, { 0x1c, 0x1d, 0x1e, 0x20 }, { 0x1d, 0x1e, 0x1f, 0x21 }, { 0x1e, 0x1f, 0x20, 0x22 }, { 0x1...

...ere is the relevant output: > > 0000000000013832 <func()>: > 13832: 55 push %rbp > 13833: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > 13836: 53 push %rbx > 13837: 48 83 ec 18 sub $0x18,%rsp > 1383b: 48 89 7d e8 mov %rdi,-0x18(%rbp) > 1383f: 48 8b 45 e8 mov -0x18(%rbp),%rax > 13843: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi > 13846: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 1384b <func()+0x19> >...

...xd }, { 0xa, 0xb, 0xc, 0xe }, { 0xb, 0xc, 0xd, 0xf }, { 0xc, 0xd, 0xe, 0x10 }, { 0xd, 0xe, 0xf, 0x11 }, { 0xe, 0xf, 0x10, 0x12 }, { 0xf, 0x10, 0x11, 0x13 }, { 0x10, 0x11, 0x12, 0x14 }, { 0x11, 0x12, 0x13, 0x15 }, { 0x12, 0x13, 0x14, 0x16 }, { 0x13, 0x14, 0x15, 0x17 }, { 0x14, 0x15, 0x16, 0x18 }, { 0x15, 0x16, 0x17, 0x19 }, { 0x16, 0x17, 0x18, 0x1a }, { 0x17, 0x18, 0x19, 0x1b }, { 0x18, 0x19, 0x1a, 0x1c }, { 0x19, 0x1a, 0x1b, 0x1d }, { 0x1a, 0x1b, 0x1c, 0x1e }, { 0x1b, 0x1c, 0x1d, 0x1f }, { 0x1c, 0x1d, 0x1e, 0x20 }, { 0x1d, 0x1e, 0x1f, 0x21 }, { 0x1e, 0x1f, 0x20, 0x22 }, { 0x1...

...; 0000000000013832 <func()>: > >> 13832: 55 push %rbp > >> 13833: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > >> 13836: 53 push %rbx > >> 13837: 48 83 ec 18 sub $0x18,%rsp > >> 1383b: 48 89 7d e8 mov %rdi,-0x18(%rbp) > >> 1383f: 48 8b 45 e8 mov -0x18(%rbp),%rax > >> 13843: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi > >> 13846: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 1384b...

...gt; >> >> 13832: 55 push %rbp > >> >> 13833: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp > >> >> 13836: 53 push %rbx > >> >> 13837: 48 83 ec 18 sub $0x18,%rsp > >> >> 1383b: 48 89 7d e8 mov %rdi,-0x18(%rbp) > >> >> 1383f: 48 8b 45 e8 mov -0x18(%rbp),%rax > >> >> 13843: 48 89 c7 mov %rax,%rdi > >> >> 13846: e...

...83 2 0x00000000 ffff880411cb9d60 0000000000000046 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff880411cb2aa0 ffff880411cb3058 ffff880411cb9fd8 000000000000fbc8 ffff880411cb3058 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8152a36e>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x13e/0x180 [<ffffffff810d24d0>] ? do_rebuild_sched_domains+0x0/0x50 [<ffffffff8152a20b>] mutex_lock+0x2b/0x50 [<ffffffff810c97b5>] cgroup_lock+0x15/0x20 [<ffffffff810d24e8>] do_rebuild_sched_domains+0x18/0x50 [<ffffffff81094a20>] worker_thread+0x170/0x2a0 [<ffffffff8109...

...0 [ 46.166701] ? virtnet_poll+0xd9c/0xfd1 [virtio_net] [ 46.166711] kasan_report+0x1dd/0x460 [ 46.166727] ? virtnet_poll+0xd9c/0xfd1 [virtio_net] [ 46.166743] virtnet_poll+0xd9c/0xfd1 [virtio_net] [ 46.166767] ? receive_buf+0x2e30/0x2e30 [virtio_net] [ 46.166796] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x2b0 [ 46.166809] ? print_irqtrace_events+0x280/0x280 [ 46.166817] ? print_irqtrace_events+0x280/0x280 [ 46.166830] ? rcu_process_callbacks+0xc5e/0x12d0 [ 46.166838] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x30 [ 46.166857] ? mark_held_locks+0xd5/0x170 [ 46.166867] ? net_rx_action+0x2aa/0x10e0 [...

...0 [ 46.166701] ? virtnet_poll+0xd9c/0xfd1 [virtio_net] [ 46.166711] kasan_report+0x1dd/0x460 [ 46.166727] ? virtnet_poll+0xd9c/0xfd1 [virtio_net] [ 46.166743] virtnet_poll+0xd9c/0xfd1 [virtio_net] [ 46.166767] ? receive_buf+0x2e30/0x2e30 [virtio_net] [ 46.166796] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x2b0 [ 46.166809] ? print_irqtrace_events+0x280/0x280 [ 46.166817] ? print_irqtrace_events+0x280/0x280 [ 46.166830] ? rcu_process_callbacks+0xc5e/0x12d0 [ 46.166838] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x30 [ 46.166857] ? mark_held_locks+0xd5/0x170 [ 46.166867] ? net_rx_action+0x2aa/0x10e0 [...

...to say: (some of it looks like repeats but some of it is very slightly different too) BUG: warning at drivers/ata/libata-core.c:4923/ata_qc_issue() (Tainted: G ) Call Trace: [<ffffffff880b6625>] :libata:ata_qc_issue+0x61/0x4a9 [<ffffffff880bacf3>] :libata:ata_scsi_rw_xlat+0x119/0x188 [<ffffffff880735a6>] :scsi_mod:scsi_done+0x0/0x18 [<ffffffff880babda>] :libata:ata_scsi_rw_xlat+0x0/0x188 [<ffffffff880baea2>] :libata:ata_scsi_translate+0x140/0x16d [<ffffffff880735a6>] :scsi_mod:scsi_done+0x0/0x18 [<ffffffff80299dd4>] keventd_create_kthread+0x0...

...jectFile19createELFObjectFileEPNS_12MemoryBufferE+17>: mov %rax,%rdi 0x00000000004cc878 <_ZN4llvm6object10ObjectFile19createELFObjectFileEPNS_12MemoryBufferE+20>: callq 0x4a51c5 <_ZN4llvm6object14getElfArchTypeEPNS_12MemoryBufferE> Callee side: The address of *Object is at -0x18(%rbp) not -0x20(%rbp): 0x00000000004a51c5 <_ZN4llvm6object14getElfArchTypeEPNS_12MemoryBufferE>: push %rbp 0x00000000004a51c6 <_ZN4llvm6object14getElfArchTypeEPNS_12MemoryBufferE+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp 0x00000000004a51c9 <_ZN4llvm6object14getElfArchTypeEPNS_12MemoryBufferE+4&...

I''ve recently re-installed an X4500 running Nevada b109 and have been experiencing ZFS lock ups regularly (perhaps once every 2-3 days). The machine is a backup server and receives hourly ZFS snapshots from another thumper - as such, the amount of zfs activity tends to be reasonably high. After about 48 - 72 hours, the file system seems to lock up and I''m unable to do anything

...et_poll+0xd9c/0xfd1 [virtio_net] > [?? 46.166711]? kasan_report+0x1dd/0x460 > [?? 46.166727]? ? virtnet_poll+0xd9c/0xfd1 [virtio_net] > [?? 46.166743]? virtnet_poll+0xd9c/0xfd1 [virtio_net] > [?? 46.166767]? ? receive_buf+0x2e30/0x2e30 [virtio_net] > [?? 46.166796]? ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x2b0 > [?? 46.166809]? ? print_irqtrace_events+0x280/0x280 > [?? 46.166817]? ? print_irqtrace_events+0x280/0x280 > [?? 46.166830]? ? rcu_process_callbacks+0xc5e/0x12d0 > [?? 46.166838]? ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x30 > [?? 46.166857]? ? mark_held_locks+0xd5/0x170 > [?? 46.166867]? ?...

...: 4004f0: vmovdqa 0x2004c8(%rip),%xmm0 # 6009c0 <x> 4004f8: vpsrld $0x17,%xmm0,%xmm0 4004fd: vpaddd 0x17b(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm0 # 400680 <__dso_handle+0x8> 400505: vcvtdq2ps %xmm0,%xmm1 400509: vdivps 0x17f(%rip),%xmm1,%xmm1 # 400690 <__dso_handle+0x18> 400511: vcvttps2dq %xmm1,%xmm1 400515: vpmullw 0x183(%rip),%xmm1,%xmm1 # 4006a0 <__dso_handle+0x28> 40051d: vpsubd %xmm1,%xmm0,%xmm0 400521: vmovq %xmm0,%rax 400526: movslq %eax,%rcx 400529: sar $0x20,%rax 40052d: vpextrq $0x1,%xmm0,%rdx 400533:...

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote: > From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> > > Add some ethtool stat items useful for performance analysis. > > Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> Series: Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Patch 1 seems appropriate for stable, even

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote: > From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> > > Add some ethtool stat items useful for performance analysis. > > Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> Series: Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Patch 1 seems appropriate for stable, even

...cdb275>] ip_conntrack_init+0x255/0x369 [ip_conntrack] Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: [<f0d45c17>] init_or_cleanup+0x17/0x290 [ip_conntrack] Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: [<f0cdb00f>] init+0xf/0x20 [ip_conntrack] Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: [<c013d86a>] sys_init_module+0x18a/0x250 Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: [<c010328f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000001] code: modprobe/11081 Apr 10 18:19:07 trinity kernel: caller is ip_conntrack_helper_register+0x18/0x170 [ip_conntrack] Apr 10 18:19:...

.../0x31c > > [ 3.576023] report_bug+0x1d4/0x290 > > [ 3.586069] bug_handler.part.2+0x40/0x100 > > [ 3.597820] bug_handler+0x4c/0x88 > > [ 3.608400] brk_handler+0x11c/0x218 > > [ 3.613430] do_debug_exception+0xe8/0x318 > > [ 3.627370] el1_dbg+0x18/0x78 > > [ 3.634037] __vunmap+0x1b8/0x220 > > [ 3.648747] vunmap+0x6c/0xc0 > > [ 3.653864] __iounmap+0x44/0x58 > > [ 3.659771] devm_ioremap_release+0x34/0x68 > > [ 3.672983] release_nodes+0x404/0x880 > > [ 3.683543] devres_release_all+0x6c...

.../0x31c > > [ 3.576023] report_bug+0x1d4/0x290 > > [ 3.586069] bug_handler.part.2+0x40/0x100 > > [ 3.597820] bug_handler+0x4c/0x88 > > [ 3.608400] brk_handler+0x11c/0x218 > > [ 3.613430] do_debug_exception+0xe8/0x318 > > [ 3.627370] el1_dbg+0x18/0x78 > > [ 3.634037] __vunmap+0x1b8/0x220 > > [ 3.648747] vunmap+0x6c/0xc0 > > [ 3.653864] __iounmap+0x44/0x58 > > [ 3.659771] devm_ioremap_release+0x34/0x68 > > [ 3.672983] release_nodes+0x404/0x880 > > [ 3.683543] devres_release_all+0x6c...

> A customer of ours is having randomly some kernel panics. Via some forum > posts I might have seen it could have something to do with Samba: > > They're running: RHEL 5.1 : Linux krulep03.verhaert.com 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 > SMP Fri Jan 26 14:15:21 EST 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > rpm -qa | grep samba > samba-client-3.0.23c-2 > samba-3.0.23c-2 >