Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "059099".
Did you mean:
59099
2013 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] Targeting ARM Cortex-a9 from x86_64 with clang
Here's where we left off:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-February/059099.html
In 3.4, I think the integrated assembler is in excellent shape and
should be enabled by default for ARM ELF. I've been using it
exclusively for at least 6 months now.
-Greg
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Out of c...
2013 Nov 26
2
[LLVMdev] Targeting ARM Cortex-a9 from x86_64 with clang
On 26 November 2013 18:46, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's where we left off:
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-February/059099.html
Back then you mentioned a Chromium build, are you still running that
routinely with -integrated-as? That would give a reasonable
reassurance about general-usage, if not weird features.
Cheers.
Tim.
2013 Nov 26
4
[LLVMdev] Targeting ARM Cortex-a9 from x86_64 with clang
>> Out of curiosity, can't clang do the assembly itself in this case?
>
> It can, but you need to use -integrated-as, because that's not the default
> yet. (some missing features).
Do you remember what those features are Renato? MC has been around
years, we really should start sorting them now.
Cheers.
Tim
2013 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] Targeting ARM Cortex-a9 from x86_64 with clang
...scape
hatch.
-Greg
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26 November 2013 18:46, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Here's where we left off:
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-February/059099.html
>
> Back then you mentioned a Chromium build, are you still running that
> routinely with -integrated-as? That would give a reasonable
> reassurance about general-usage, if not weird features.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Tim.