Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "026872".
Did you mean:
021872
2006 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] Intel vs. AT&T Assembly.
...GAS's is just one.
Greater variation is due to differences in pseudo ops.
> Last June, Aaron Gray offered to fix Intel mode so that it actually produced
> Intel syntax. He offered was a gigantic cut and paste:
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050627/026872.html.
> Then he apparently lost interest, though he now claims he had finished it
> after all but simply neglected to give us a patch.
Yup, that's true. Note, however, that that patch just moved around
existing functionality, it didn't change or add anything (hence the use of
th...
2006 Apr 29
4
[LLVMdev] Intel vs. AT&T Assembly.
We know. Someone offered to do the Intel version, but did little more
than a huge cut and paste of the AT&T version and then lost interest.
No one else has had the time or inclination to finish the (barely begun)
job. Patches accepted :)
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> It's a long way towards it:
>>
>> # AT&T. # Intel.