search for: 00bc

...haracters in arguments plain <- function(myarg = c("Basel", "Bern", "Z?rich")) { myarg <- match.arg(myarg) } ## function that uses UTF-8 escape sequences in arguments escaped <- function(myarg = c("Basel", "Bern", "Z\u00BCrich")) { myarg <- match.arg(myarg) } ## test plain("Z?rich") ## works plain("Z\u00BCrich") ## fails escaped("Z?rich") ## fails escaped("Z\u00BCrich") ## works Thank you for your help. Thomas Zumbrunn > sessionInfo()...

...ical address mapping (0xc0000000) - unimplemented fixme:int31:DOSVM_Int31Handler allocate descriptor (0x0004), stub! Phar Lap err 10093: Unable to allocate hardwired LDT descriptors from DPMI host err:int31:XMS_Handler int31: unknown/not implemented parameters: int31: AX 0600, BX 10c4, CX 3e14, DX 00bc, SI 5a66, DI 0b5e, DS 199b, ES 199b namhv at ubuntu:/media/disk/ktgd$ dir autobackup.bat DBF DI270309 FOXPROX.EXE PRG VNI B.DBF DEN DI301208 FOXUSER.DBF QUY WSTMP BUTRU DI DICH.FXP FOXUSER.FPT QUY1 BUTRU000.108 DI151208 DICH.PRG GD.BAT saoke CONFIG.FP DI240209 E.IDX LO...

...XPEAK 1 0) (XEN) ACPI Warning (tbfadt-0444): Optional field "Pm2ControlBlock" has zero address or length: 0000000000000050/0 [20070126] (XEN) ACPI: DSDT DB7D1A4F, A606 (r1 COMPAQ DSDT_PRJ 1 MSFT 100000E) (XEN) ACPI: FACS DB7D1500, 0040 (XEN) ACPI: APIC DB7D165C, 00BC (r1 COMPAQ IBEXPEAK 1 0) (XEN) ACPI: ASF! DB7D1718, 0063 (r32 COMPAQ IBEXPEAK 1 0) (XEN) ACPI: MCFG DB7D177B, 003C (r1 COMPAQ IBEXPEAK 1 0) (XEN) ACPI: TCPA DB7D17B7, 0032 (r1 COMPAQ IBEXPEAK 1 0) (XEN) ACPI: SLIC DB7D17E9,...

I know it's really early in the project's life, but another question I had: How does the generated 68K code perform, at least compared to modern GCC? -- Chris

...(r2 INTEL ) (XEN) ACPI: XSDT CF7FD120, 0074 (r1 INTEL? KBIBX10J???? 1730?????? 1000013) (XEN) ACPI: FACP CF7FC000, 00F4 (r3 INTEL? KBIBX10J???? 1730 MSFT? 100000D) (XEN) ACPI: DSDT CF7F7000, 4110 (r2 INTEL? KBIBX10J???? 1730 MSFT? 100000D) (XEN) ACPI: FACS CF768000, 0040 (XEN) ACPI: APIC CF7F6000, 00BC (r2 INTEL? KBIBX10J???? 1730 MSFT? 100000D) (XEN) ACPI: WDDT CF7F5000, 0040 (r1 INTEL? KBIBX10J???? 1730 MSFT? 100000D) (XEN) ACPI: MCFG CF7F4000, 003C (r1 INTEL? KBIBX10J???? 1730 MSFT? 100000D) (XEN) ACPI: ASF! CF7F3000, 00A5 (r32 INTEL? KBIBX10J???? 1730 MSFT? 100000D) (XEN) ACPI: HPET CF7F2000,...

Hi! Some time ago (samba 3.0.1?) I added machines to my domain with 'srvmrg.exe' and all went as I expect. IIRC. If I am now adding machines, all machine-accounts have the initially group "users" set instead of "machines". But they should't. | add machine script = useradd -d /dev/null -g machines -s /bin/false %u This is, because even if adding machines to the

...(r2 IBM CPUSCOPE 4000 MSFT 1000016) (XEN) ACPI: SSDT 689B0000, 0132 (r2 IBM CPUWYVRN 4000 MSFT 1000016) (XEN) ACPI: SSDT 68B15000, 02AA (r2 IBM CPUCSTAT 4000 MSFT 1000016) (XEN) ACPI: SSDT 689AF000, 0214 (r2 IBM WYVRNDEV 4000 MSFT 1000016) (XEN) ACPI: DMAR 66797000, 00BC (r1 IBM SERMEGAL 1 MSFT 1000021) (XEN) SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 0 -> Node 0 (XEN) SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 2 -> Node 0 (XEN) SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 4 -> Node 0 (XEN) SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 6 -> Node 0 (XEN) SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 0-80000000 (XEN) SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 100000000-28000000...

...1 HP ProLiant 2 0) (XEN) ACPI: SRAT E762F680, 0570 (r1 HP Proliant 1 ÔøΩ 162E) (XEN) ACPI: FFFF E762FC00, 0176 (r1 HP ProLiant 1 ÔøΩ 162E) (XEN) ACPI: BERT E762FD80, 0030 (r1 HP ProLiant 1 ÔøΩ 162E) (XEN) ACPI: HEST E762FDC0, 00BC (r1 HP ProLiant 1 ÔøΩ 162E) (XEN) ACPI: DMAR E762FE80, 012E (r1 HP ProLiant 1 ÔøΩ 162E) (XEN) ACPI: SSDT E7632480, 0125 (r3 HP CRSPCI0 2 HP 1) (XEN) ACPI: SSDT E76325C0, 03BB (r1 HP pcc 1 INTL 20090625) (XEN) ACPI: SSDT E7632980...

Hello all, I am having a pretty serious problem with rpcclient ... if I try 'enumprinters' at the prompt, i get back rpcclient $> enumprinters cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL However, enumdrivers works fine. Addriver does not work either, and just returns NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL ... which means that

...r1 GBT GBTUACPI 42302E31 GBTU 98) (XEN) ACPI: MCFG D7BE8840, 003C (r1 GBT GBTUACPI 42302E31 GBTU 1010101) (XEN) ACPI: EUDS D7BE8880, 04D0 (r1 GBT 0 0) (XEN) ACPI: TAMG D7BE8D50, 0A4A (r1 GBT GBT B0 5455312E BG^A^A 53450101) (XEN) ACPI: APIC D7BE86C0, 00BC (r1 GBT GBTUACPI 42302E31 GBTU 1010101) (XEN) ACPI: SSDT D7BE97A0, 1BA0 (r1 INTEL PPM RCM 80000001 INTL 20061109) (XEN) Xen heap: 9MB (9688kB) (XEN) Domain heap initialised (XEN) Processor #0 6:5 APIC version 21 (XEN) Processor #4 6:5 APIC version 21 (XEN) Processor #1 6:5 APIC version 21 (XE...

..._len: 00000014 0068 buffer : R.I.C.O.H. .A.f.i.c.i.o. .7.0.0. .P.S... 0090 uni_max_len: 0000000f 0094 undoc : 00000000 0098 uni_str_len: 0000000f 009c buffer : W.i.n.d.o.w.s. .N.T. .x.8.6... 00bc uni_max_len: 0000000d 00c0 undoc : 00000000 00c4 uni_str_len: 0000000d 00c8 buffer : R.I.N.H.7.P.S.5...D.L.L... 00e4 uni_max_len: 0000000d 00e8 undoc : 00000000 00ec uni_str_len: 0000000d...

I've upgraded my system at Samba 3.0.20 (SLES 8) bacause of some errors on winbind and Windows 2003. Now, usrmgr.exe doesn't work anymore. It reports: ?procedure number is out of range - Do you want to administrate another domain?? USRMGR has been working for 3 years; I've made all upgrades on Windows 2000, but the results it's the same. Any Idea? uz.

...~ 00b0 unkown: 00000000 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00b4 unkown: 00000000 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00b8 unkown: 00000000 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00bc unkown: 00000000 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00c0 unkown: 00000000 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00c4 unkown: 00000000 [2005/05/13 15:05:58, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642) ~ 00c8 num_other_s...

...:quartz:ACMWrapper_ProcessSampleData Cannot unprepare header 5 fixme:win:EnumDisplayDevicesW ((null),0,0x7f9bdb9c,0x00000000), stub! fixme:xrandr:X11DRV_XRandR_SetCurrentMode Cannot change screen BPP from 32 to 16 wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x00000000 at address 0x7e7ddb91 (thread 00bc), starting debugger... WineDbg starting on pid 0xbb Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x00000000 in 32-bit code (0x7e7ddb91). In 32 bit mode. Register dump: CS:0073 SS:007b DS:007b ES:007b FS:1007 GS:0033 EIP:7e7ddb91 ESP:7f9be08c EBP:7f9be13c EFLAGS:00010246( - 00 -RIZP1)...

...0090 offset : 00000000 0094 uni_str_len: 0000000b 0098 buffer : 0000ae smb_io_unistr2 sharename 00b0 uni_max_len: 00000005 00b4 offset : 00000000 00b8 uni_str_len: 00000005 00bc buffer : 0000c6 smb_io_unistr2 portname 00c8 uni_max_len: 00000013 00cc offset : 00000000 00d0 uni_str_len: 00000013 00d4 buffer : 0000fa smb_io_unistr2 drivername 00fc uni_max_len:...

...710) 00b0 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00b4 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00b8 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00bc unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00c0 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00c4 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00c8 num_other_sids...

...t32(710) 00b0 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00b4 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00b8 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00bc unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00c0 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00c4 unkown: 00000000 [2007/08/03 12:55:07, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(710) 00c8 num_other_sids: 0...

Dear mailinglist, I own a Gigabyte motherboard GA 970A UD3 with IOMMU support. Since the update XSA-36 (also part of the latest debian wheezy pkg), the IO-Virtualisation does not work any more as discussed on this mailinglist [0] and [1]. I like to ask, if there is an "official" solution in sight. I''m not sure about my alternatives. How "dangerous" is the

...32(704) > 00b4 offset : 00000000 >[2006/08/27 20:03:03, 5, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(704) > 00b8 uni_str_len: 00000003 >[2006/08/27 20:03:03, 5, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(936) > 00bc buffer : G.S.B. >[2006/08/27 20:03:03, 9, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(84) > 0000c2 smb_io_unistr2 uni_user_name >[2006/08/27 20:03:03, 5, pid=18112] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(704) > 00c4 uni_max_len: 00000003 >[2006/08...