Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "000192".
Did you mean:
000197
2009 Feb 10
1
Centos 5.2 Xen question?
Did this one ever get resolved? I'm having the same issue with a
different card set.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2008-January/000192.html
Leam
2004 Apr 21
1
Fwd: RE: OCFS Hang
...toms sound *very* similar. The patch has supposedly been merged
into the source tree but I don't think they've released a new version
of
OCFS since the merge. (Sunil or Wim - do you know if this bugfix was
included in 1.0.11-1?)
Check
http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/2004-March/000192.html
For the geek [technical] description, check
http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/2004-March/000185.html or
http://www.asugroup.com/ocfsbugfix.txt
Jeremy
>>> "Doering, Randy" <Randy.Doering@ventersciencejtc.org> 04/19/2004
6:23:52 PM >>>
Kurt, Thanks...
2006 Jan 18
1
Problem in rpc_api_pipe related to the \spoolss pipe
...bytes.
000000 spoolss_io_r_getprinter
0000 ptr: f000baaa
000004 prs_rpcbuffer
0004 size: 000001b4
01bc needed: 000001b4
01c0 status: WERR_OK
000000 smb_io_printer_info_2
0000 offset: 000001a8
0001a8 smb_io_unistr servername
01a8 unistr:
0004 offset: 00000192
000192 smb_io_unistr printername
0192 unistr:
0008 offset: 00000188
000188 smb_io_unistr sharename
0188 unistr:
000c offset: 00000162
000162 smb_io_unistr portname
0162 unistr:
0010 offset: 00000158
000158 smb_io_unistr drivername
0158...
2004 Apr 19
5
OCFS Hang
Greetings,
Having read about the previous OSFS hangs, I think this one
that we are seeing is different, but I'm not sure if this is caused by
OCFS or the Linux OS.
We are running OCFS Version 1.09 with Linux AS 3.0/9i RAC.
We have a 2 node Intel Cluster (Node 1 and Node 2). This morning the DBA
tried to do an "ls" command on /u06/oradata/database
2008 Sep 11
2
alpm(4) I/O range is claimed by ACPI
Hi,
How can I load the alpm(4) module for SMBus support on my ASUS Vintage
AH-1 system?
It appears the I/O range it uses is claimed by the acpi(4) driver. Can I
override the mapping in some way i.e. tell ACPI not to claim the range?
I don't see anything obvious about this in the acpi(4) man page.
thanks,
BMS
2002 Oct 23
3
cupsaddsmb rpcclient error
...ocation
000174 smb_io_unistr2 - NULL sepfile
000174 smb_io_unistr2 printprocessor
0174 uni_max_len: 00000009
0178 undoc : 00000000
017c uni_str_len: 00000009
0180 buffer : w.i.n.p.r.i.n.t...
000192 smb_io_unistr2 datatype
0194 uni_max_len: 00000004
0198 undoc : 00000000
019c uni_str_len: 00000004
01a0 buffer : R.A.W...
0001a8 smb_io_unistr2 - NULL parameters
0001a8 spoolss_io_devmode_cont
01a8 si...
2005 Mar 02
0
Can access shares, but cannot logon to the domain
...prs.c:prs_uint32(642)
0150 uni_str_len: 0000001f
[2005/03/01 00:15:09, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(814)
0154 buffer :
\.\.a.c.m.e.-.s.e.r.v.e.r.\.p.r.o.f.i.l.e.s.\.m.a.u.n.e.l.i.e.
[2005/03/01 00:15:09, 7] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(82)
000192 smb_io_unistr2 uni_home_dir
[2005/03/01 00:15:09, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642)
0194 uni_max_len: 00000016
[2005/03/01 00:15:09, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642)
0198 offset : 00000000
[2005/03/01 00:15:09, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(642...