search for: 000042

...ra.com> wrote: > Fond an old boot logg: > [ 0.000000] efi: EFI v2.50 by Lenovo > [ 0.000000] efi: SMBIOS=0x6f098000 SMBIOS 3.0=0x6f095000 ACPI=0x6fffe000 ACPI 2.0=0x6fffe014 MPS=0x6f468000 ESRT=0x6eb33000 MEMATTR=0x6976d018 > [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x000000006FF53000 000042 (v01 LENOVO TP-N1W 00001200 PTEC 00000002) > [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x000000006FF39000 00013E (v01 LENOVO TP-N1W 00001200 PTEC 00000002) It sure doesn't look 2.5 compliant to me. Merely adding the new stuff from a new UEFI spec version doesn't mean it's compliant with the cu...

Hi, I have configured dovecot for auth_bind against an LDAP server on the localhost and I'm seeing the following error in my dovecot logs: dovecot: Apr 30 09:03:18 Error: auth(default): LDAP: ldap_result() failed: Can't contact LDAP server dovecot: Apr 30 09:03:27 Error: auth(default): LDAP: ldap_result() failed: Can't contact LDAP server ... and so on ... When I turned on LDAP

...; [ 0.000000] efi: EFI v2.50 by Lenovo > > > > > > [ 0.000000] efi: SMBIOS=0x6f098000 SMBIOS 3.0=0x6f095000 ACPI=0x6fffe000 ACPI 2.0=0x6fffe014 MPS=0x6f468000 ESRT=0x6eb33000 MEMATTR=0x6976d018 > > > > > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x000000006FF53000 000042 (v01 LENOVO TP-N1W 00001200 PTEC 00000002) > > > > > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x000000006FF39000 00013E (v01 LENOVO TP-N1W 00001200 PTEC 00000002) > > > > > > > > > > It sure doesn't look 2.5 compliant to me. Merely adding the new stuff &...

I am trying to do webdav on rails. I already did it with PHP so it should not be much difference. However I have some problems. 1) When Word sends PROPFIND it sends GET request with XML inside the request body. However I cannot seem to get this information. request.body returns no such method even though request.inspect shows there is instance variable called @body. How can I access that? 2)

...not on the same handle as the PxeBc. Fond an old boot logg: [ 0.000000] efi: EFI v2.50 by Lenovo [ 0.000000] efi: SMBIOS=0x6f098000 SMBIOS 3.0=0x6f095000 ACPI=0x6fffe000 ACPI 2.0=0x6fffe014 MPS=0x6f468000 ESRT=0x6eb33000 MEMATTR=0x6976d018 [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x000000006FF53000 000042 (v01 LENOVO TP-N1W 00001200 PTEC 00000002) [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x000000006FF39000 00013E (v01 LENOVO TP-N1W 00001200 PTEC 00000002)

...gt; > > [ 0.000000] efi: EFI v2.50 by Lenovo >> > > > [ 0.000000] efi: SMBIOS=0x6f098000 SMBIOS 3.0=0x6f095000 ACPI=0x6fffe000 ACPI 2.0=0x6fffe014 MPS=0x6f468000 ESRT=0x6eb33000 MEMATTR=0x6976d018 >> > > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x000000006FF53000 000042 (v01 LENOVO TP-N1W 00001200 PTEC 00000002) >> > > > [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x000000006FF39000 00013E (v01 LENOVO TP-N1W 00001200 PTEC 00000002) >> > > >> > > It sure doesn't look 2.5 compliant to me. Merely adding the new stuff >> > > f...

...s the PxeBc. > > Fond an old boot logg: > [ 0.000000] efi: EFI v2.50 by Lenovo > [ 0.000000] efi: SMBIOS=0x6f098000 SMBIOS 3.0=0x6f095000 ACPI=0x6fffe000 ACPI 2.0=0x6fffe014 MPS=0x6f468000 ESRT=0x6eb33000 MEMATTR=0x6976d018 > [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x000000006FF53000 000042 (v01 LENOVO TP-N1W 00001200 PTEC 00000002) > [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x000000006FF39000 00013E (v01 LENOVO TP-N1W 00001200 PTEC 00000002) > _______________________________________________ > Syslinux mailing list > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com <mailto:Syslinux at zytor.c...

.... std.load / std.store 3. FIR dialect memory access operations. > I must also point out that the question of where to do loop transformations is a topic we have not fully converged on. See the following thread for discussions. http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2019-September/000042.html Looks like placement (MLIR / LLVM) of various transformations related to OpenMP has not been finalized, from what I could infer from Johannes’s reply and the below text in the latest RFC in discourse: “So there exist some questions regarding where the optimisations should be carried out. We...

...ory access operations. >> >> >> > I must also point out that the question of where to do loop >> transformations is a topic we have not fully converged on. See the >> following thread for discussions. >> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2019-September/000042.html >> >> Looks like placement (MLIR / LLVM) of various transformations related to >> OpenMP has not been finalized, from what I could infer from Johannes’s >> reply and the below text in the latest RFC in discourse: >> >> “So there exist some questions regardin...

On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 18:18 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund > <Joakim.Tjernlund at infinera.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 18:03 -0500, Gene Cumm

...>> >>>> > I must also point out that the question of where to do loop >>>> transformations is a topic we have not fully converged on. See the >>>> following thread for discussions. >>>> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/flang-dev/2019-September/000042.html >>>> >>>> Looks like placement (MLIR / LLVM) of various transformations related >>>> to OpenMP has not been finalized, from what I could infer from Johannes’s >>>> reply and the below text in the latest RFC in discourse: >>>> >>...

On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 18:03 -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Joakim Tjernlund > >

Hi, I have few questions / concerns regarding the design of OpenMP dialect in MLIR that is currently being implemented, mainly for the f18 compiler. Below, I summarize the current state of various efforts in clang / f18 / MLIR / LLVM regarding this. Feel free to add to the list in case I have missed something. 1. [May 2019] An OpenMPIRBuilder in LLVM was proposed for flang and clang frontends.

...000034 (v01 INTEL 00000000 MSFT 0000005F) [ 0.000000] ACPI: DBG2 0x00000000C3E91730 000054 (v00 INTEL 00000000 MSFT 0000005F) [ 0.000000] ACPI: SSDT 0x00000000C3E91788 004C13 (v02 SaSsdt SaSsdt 00003000 INTL 20120913) [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x00000000C3E963A0 000042 (v01 00000000 00000000) [ 0.000000] ACPI: SSDT 0x00000000C3E963E8 000E6E (v02 CpuRef CpuSsdt 00003000 INTL 20120913) [ 0.000000] ACPI: DMAR 0x00000000C3E97258 0000A8 (v01 INTEL SKL 00000001 INTL 00000001) [ 0.000000] ACPI: ASF! 0x00000000C3E97300 0000A5...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109681 Bug ID: 109681 Summary: Nvidia GT710 => nouveau + wayland + swayWM => crash when use acceleration (open Firefox) Product: Mesa Version: 18.3 Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical

...BAFE1000 000054 (v01 LENOVO TP-G5 00001070 PTL 00000002) [ 0.000000] ACPI: ASF! 0x00000000BAFE8000 0000A5 (v32 LENOVO TP-G5 00001070 PTL 00000002) [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x00000000BAFE0000 00003E (v01 LENOVO TP-G5 00001070 PTL 00000002) [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x00000000BAFDF000 000042 (v01 PTL COMBUF 00000001 PTL 00000001) [ 0.000000] ACPI: POAT 0x00000000BAFDE000 000055 (v03 LENOVO TP-G5 00001070 PTL 00000002) [ 0.000000] ACPI: SSDT 0x00000000BAFDD000 000C20 (v01 PmRef Cpu0Ist 00003000 INTL 20061109) [ 0.000000] ACPI: SSDT 0x00000000BAFDC000 000A7E (v01 PmR...

...7A8C1428 00287B (v02 PegSsd PegSsdt 00001000 INTL 20160422) [ 0.000000] ACPI: HPET 0x000000007A8C3CA8 000038 (v01 INTEL KBL 00000001 MSFT 0000005F) [ 0.000000] ACPI: SSDT 0x000000007A8C3CE0 000E3B (v02 INTEL Ther_Rvp 00001000 INTL 20160422) [ 0.000000] ACPI: UEFI 0x000000007A8C4B20 000042 (v01 INTEL EDK2 00000002 01000013) [ 0.000000] ACPI: SSDT 0x000000007A8C4B68 000EDE (v02 CpuRef CpuSsdt 00003000 INTL 20160422) [ 0.000000] ACPI: LPIT 0x000000007A8C5A48 000094 (v01 INTEL KBL 00000000 MSFT 0000005F) [ 0.000000] ACPI: WSMT 0x000000007A8C5AE0 000028 (v01 INT...

...undoc : 00000000 [2003/05/22 12:19:39, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(634) 0030 uni_str_len: 00000007 [2003/05/22 12:19:39, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(806) 0034 buffer : A.R.A.F.O.X... [2003/05/22 12:19:39, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(81) 000042 smb_io_chal [2003/05/22 12:19:39, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8s(721) 0042 data: 48 54 05 ed 72 c3 3a 35 [2003/05/22 12:19:39, 5] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:create_rpc_request(872) create_rpc_request: opnum: 0x4 data_len: 0x62 [2003/05/22 12:19:39, 10] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:create_rpc...

...: 00000008 0010 buffer : \.\.C.I.T.Y.2... 000020 smb_io_unistr2 unistr2 0020 uni_max_len: 0000000a 0024 offset : 00000000 0028 uni_str_len: 0000000a 002c buffer : S.Z.R.O.U.T.E.R.$... 0040 sec_chan: 0002 000042 smb_io_unistr2 unistr2 0044 uni_max_len: 00000009 0048 offset : 00000000 004c uni_str_len: 00000009 0050 buffer : S.Z.R.O.U.T.E.R... 000062 smb_io_chal 0062 data: 5b b8 0c b1 39 0c 20 40 00006a net_io_neg_flags 006c...

Hello, I am encountering a 30 second hang during boot, in the Xorg process just before the display manager comes up. I have bisected the problem to the following commit: commit 2b700825e7a7702fb862edba1262c98040dc1bf6 Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Date: Thu Aug 20 14:54:22 2015 +1000 drm/nouveau/mc: move device irq handling to platform-specific code The hang only