Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "0.7129".
Did you mean:
0.129
2009 Jun 23
1
Error in .subset(x, j) : only 0's may be mixed with negative subscripts
I have a data set called datastep4 with 211484 rows and 95 columns
> dim(datastep4)
[1] 211484 95
The first few column names are given below, note the first one is
"RESPONDED"
> names(datastep4)[1:5]
[1] "RESPONDED" "VAR_30" "VAR_31" "VAR_32" "VAR_33"
A table of RESPONDED shows mostly zeros
>
2013 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
Hi, Sean:
I'm sorry I lie. I didn't mean to lie. I did try to avoid making a
*BIG* change
to the IPO pass-ordering for now. However, when I make a minor change to
populateLTOPassManager() by separating module-pass and non-module-passes, I
saw quite a few performance difference, most of them are degradations.
Attacking
these degradations one by one in a piecemeal manner is wasting
2013 Jul 18
3
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got
chance to list a detailed pass order
for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations.
This is wish-list in our mind:
pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or
just inline tiny func), get rid of
all loop xforms...
post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only