search for: 0.5b

Hi, [Background] I've been trying (unsuccessfully) to get a reliable RH linux distribution installed on my Intel machine with journaling on my large disks (not interested in journaling the root fs). I've tried using ReiserFS and eventually had some success, but it would seem that they are more in bed with Suse. It would appear that RedHat has chose ext3 as it's current journaling

-----Original Message----- From: 박노희 [mailto:nohhee@turbolinuxsystems.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:35 PM To: 'ext3-users-admin@redhat.com' Subject: ext3 problem? Please give me advice about the following problem. A few days ago, I lost some of oracle DB data on my server. My server was running Oracle DB and HA(high availability) server for web service. The filesystem was ext3,

Hi there, I am very new in linux and met the filesystem problem as described in the following, I tried to use 'fsck' and tried to find some support documents but failed. Your hints and helps are very appreciated. Millions of thanks, Annie The error message is (sorry for it's length, I just want to make it clear) ====================================================================

Hi, I am trying out ext3 with an external journal (on a battery backed RAM card). I use data=journal, and sync nfs writes go nice and fast :-) But.. I had to power cycle it (buggy VM.. grumble :-) and now I cannot get my filesystem back. It is only a test filesystem so I don't need the data. But I want this to work before I put real data on it. If I "fsck /dev/md1", it

Hi there, I am very new in linux and met the filesystem problem as described in the following, I tried to use 'fsck' and tried to find some support documents but failed. Your hints and helps are very appreciated. Millions of thanks, Annie The error message is (sorry for it's length, I just want to make it clear) ====================================================================

hello all, I am trying to expand my /var file system which resides on a logical volume. I successfully issued the lvextend command. However when I try to issue the ext2online command I receive a return code of 3 which the man pages indicates: ext2online /var ext2online v1.1.18 - 2001/03/18 for EXT2FS 0.5b ext2online: group 0, block 7 not reserved ext2online: unable to resize

I installed CentOS on my home-server with 2 IDE 160GB MAXTOR HDD / RAID-1, LVM and ext3 partitions. Previous OS on this machine was FC2. I often "play" with LVM and, sometimes, have to extand or reduce some volumes size. I was surprised to see that resize2fs isn''t included anymore ! The replacing tool is ext2online but this one seems to only be able to grow a filesystem (not

Hi all I am having some trouble using the ext2online utility, I have reduced the problem down to its simplist form, and it goes soemthing like this: Start with a regular msdos labelled disk (I have tried lvm volumes): Command (m for help): p Disk /dev/sdb: 18.3 GB, 18351967232 bytes 64 heads, 32 sectors/track, 17501 cylinders Units = cylinders of 2048 * 512 = 1048576 bytes Device Boot

Hi I am running a PC under Linux SuSE 7.2 with kernel 2.4.18, self compiled. I changed some days ago the partition of my second HD from ext2 to ext3 with the help of tune2fs -j /dev/hdb2 and everything was running OK. Today, I had a problem with a frozen display and I had to reboot the box cold. During the corresponding forced check I got the following messages: Quote --------- /dev/hdb2: reading

I am using a Redhat 7.1 system with the Kernel 2.4.10. I have the two partitions on the system: /dev/hda1 = / /dev/hb5 = /extra I was able to create the journal for both filesystems using the tune2fs -j command. I have also updated my "fstab" file to reflect "ext3" When I try to reboot the machine without unmounting the filesystems. It still shows that I have not cleanly

One of our users here got the following with an ext3 0.0.6b: # debugfs /dev/hda3 debugfs 1.20-WIP, 17-Jan-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 /dev/hda3: Bad magic number in super-block while opening filesystem debugfs: Does debugfs need updating? b.

Erm, sheez having alot of problems :( I have just been reading all the archives on the mailing list for the past few hours and decided to try make the journal with: tune2fs -j -J10 /dev/hdc1 [root@tkw /]# tune2fs -j -J10 /dev/hdc1 tune2fs 1.20-WIP, 17-Jan-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 Creating journal inode: done [root@tkw /]# cat /etc/fstab /dev/hdc1 /usr/local ext3

Hello. We have, over the last few months, lost ext3 filesystems three times. The whole filesystem left unusable. nfs-server:~# mount /dev/rd/c0d1p1 /mnt -t ext3 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/rd/c0d1p1, or too many mounted file systems (in dmesg) EXT3-fs: journal inode is deleted. EXT3-fs: get root inode failed nfs-server:~# fsck /dev/rd/c0d1p1 Parallelizing

Hello, I just need a little clarification regarding applying the ext3 patch to the latest kernel. I have 2.4.7-10 that came with RH 7.2. I have ext3 running. I need to upgrade those (to get some USB device working). So I got the latest kernel, 2.4.14, patched it with the ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414 patch, picked ext3 from 'make xconfig', built the kernel, but the new stuff in /boot, etc.,

Hi everyone, I've been running Redhat 7.2 (new install) for about 2 weeks now without any problems, but today I was not so lucky. My system hung while I was trying to configure the kernel-source RPM using 'xconfig'. After rebooting the system, it seems that my whole ext3 file system is corrupted. I get the message: Mounting root filesystem EXT3-fs: ide0(3,3):couldn't mount

Hello, As a Virtuozzo users we have majority of our diskspace formatted with -i 1024 -b 1024. Lately I discovered that on CentOS 4.6 ext2online barfs when I try to grow such filesystem. Running it with -v -d, it prints lots of lines like: ext2online v1.1.18 - 2001/03/18 for EXT2FS 0.5b ext2online: 873646830 is a bad size for an ext2 fs! rounding down to 873644033 ... group NNN inode table has

> Hello, Hi! > I just need a little clarification regarding applying the ext3 patch > to the latest kernel. > I have 2.4.7-10 that came with RH 7.2. > I have ext3 running. > I need to upgrade those (to get some USB device working). > So I got the latest kernel, 2.4.14, patched it with the ext3-2.4- >0.9.15-2414 patch, picked ext3 from 'make xconfig', built the

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

I am using a Redhat 7.1 system with the Kernel 2.4.10. I have the two partitions on the system: /dev/hda1 = / /dev/hb5 = /extra I was able to create the journal for both filesystems using the tune2fs -j command. I have also updated my "fstab" file to reflect "ext3" When I try to reboot the machine without unmounting the filesystems. It still shows that I have not cleanly

Hi Ted, ext3 folks, Here's what I get when trying to add an ext3 journal to a mounted ext2 filesystem here: # tunefs -j /dev/hda5 tune2fs 1.21, 15-Jun-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 Creating journal inode: tune2fs: Bad file descriptor while trying to create journal file which is not surprising, given that the filedescriptor is closed (and not re-opened) before the fstat in