search for: 0.4674

Dear R list, I've been attempting to interpret the results from a three-way ANOVA. I think I understand contrasts and the R defaults for these (treatment contrasts). My question is: what is the intercept in this test? As far as I can tell, its NOT the expected value of a point that belongs to the first level of all three explanatory factors (because there is only one point that satisfies these

Hi All, I want to extract elements of elements in a list. Here's an example of what I mean: If I create a list: x <- as.list(100) for(loop in c(1:100)) { x[[loop]] <- summary(runif(100)) } > head(x) [[1]] Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 0.02271 0.25260 0.58130 0.52120 0.77270 0.99670 [[2]] Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 0.006796 0.259700

Hi, Sean: I'm sorry I lie. I didn't mean to lie. I did try to avoid making a *BIG* change to the IPO pass-ordering for now. However, when I make a minor change to populateLTOPassManager() by separating module-pass and non-module-passes, I saw quite a few performance difference, most of them are degradations. Attacking these degradations one by one in a piecemeal manner is wasting

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only