search for: 0.3172

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "0.3172".

Did you mean: 0.0172
2012 Dec 13
2
[LLVMdev] failures in test-suite for make TEST=simple
I'm getting three failures. TEST-FAIL: exec /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.expandfft TEST-RESULT-exec-time: user 0.3200 TEST-RESULT-exec-real-time: real 0.3172 TEST-FAIL: exec /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/SSE/sse.stepfft TEST-RESULT-exec-time: user 0.4000
2012 Oct 06
2
warning in summary(aov())
Hi R-listers, I am receiving an error - see below. Aeventexhumed is the event in which nesting occured, so it is defined by A, B, C. I thought as a factor was ok, tried to change it to as.character but it still gave me the same error. Is there something I should do about this error or just ignore it? Please advise, Jean >summary(aov(EDI ~ HTLIndex + Aeventexhumed + HTLIndex:Aeventexhumed,
2012 Dec 13
2
[LLVMdev] failures in test-suite for make TEST=simple
The first one failed on a diff: ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.expandfft' FAILED! ******************** Execution Context Diff: /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp: Compared: 1.139094e-07 and 1.159249e-07 abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-02/0.000000e+00 ******************** TEST (simple)
2012 Dec 13
0
[LLVMdev] failures in test-suite for make TEST=simple
I forgot to mention that you can also run "make TEST=simple report" which will generate a nice report. Do you know why these tests fail ? You can step into the test directory and run 'make TEST=simple' from there. It will save you some time. On Dec 12, 2012, at 4:04 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > I'm getting three failures. > > TEST-FAIL:
2012 Dec 13
0
[LLVMdev] failures in test-suite for make TEST=simple
when I create the report, there are no failures in it. so maybe these are being filtered for known failures. On 12/12/2012 05:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: > The first one failed on a diff: > ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.expandfft' FAILED! > ******************** > Execution Context Diff: > /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp: Compared: >
2012 Dec 13
1
[LLVMdev] failures in test-suite for make TEST=simple
I use the 'make TEST=simple' as a pre-commit test. I think that everybody should run these tests before committing to LLVM. On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:06 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > when I create the report, there are no failures in it. so maybe these are being filtered for known failures. > > On 12/12/2012 05:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: >> The first
2006 Oct 11
1
extracting rows
Hi, I have a matrix with few hundred by a few hundred and want to extract rows, e.g. (0,1,0), or (1.3, 2.4, 4). I made an example: > A = rep(rep(c(0,1),4),2) > B = rep(rep(c(0,1),each=4),2) > C = rep(rep(rep(c(0,1),2),each=2),2) > X = data.frame(A,B,C,rnorm(16)) A B C [1,] 0 0 0 0.72767870 [2,] 1 0 0 -0.09673298 [3,] 0 0 1 0.51192790 [4,] 1 0 1 -1.54350441 [5,] 0 1 0
2004 Jan 12
0
nmbd eats near of 40% of cpu with Samba 3.01
My operating system is Solaris 8 SPARC and it runs Samba 3.0.1 Any suggestions? I have included configuration/logs and traces. This is the smb.conf file: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 151.184.34.182 (151.184.34.182) # Date: 2003/09/17 20:34:48 # Global parameters [global] netbios name = dali workgroup = DALIUNIX passdb backend = tdbsam os level