search for: 0.0172

Dear all, Using the data set and code below, I am interested in modelling how egg temperature (egg.temp) is related to energy expenditure (kjday) and clutch size (treat) in incubating birds using the lme-function. I wish to generate the F-distribution for my model, and have tried to do so using the anova()-function. However, in the resulting anova-table, the parameter kjday has gone from being

Dear all, I have a question concerning the p-value. When running coxph I get a p-value = 0. :confused: Can this be true? Why aren?t there decimal points? Is there a way to find out the exact p-value? Here is the output: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Call: coxph(formula = Surv(start, stop, status) ~ Albumin_gproL, data = dial,

Dear R Users, I did not get any reply on my question so I am re-asking. This time I am giving sample data: 1 60.3162 -13.5993 -0.4353 46.0938 0.1877 -0.194E-07 2 60.3713 -13.5992 -0.4423 46.1241 0.2057 -0.231E-06 3 60.3430 -13.5981 -1.6163 44.9048 0.2237 -0.270E-06 4 60.3227 -13.5970 -2.6258 43.8785 0.2213

Dear all, Using the data set and code below, I am interested in modelling how egg temperature (egg.temp) is related to energy expenditure (kjday) and clutch size (treat) in incubating birds using the lme-function. I wish to generate the F-distribution for my model, and have tried to do so using the anova()-function. However, in the resulting anova-table, the parameter kjday has gone from

Dear List: Below is the validation output of a fitted ordinal logistic model using the bootstrap in the rms package. My interpretation is that most of the corrected indices indicate little overfitting, however the slope seems to indicate that the model is too optimistic. Given that most of the corrected indices seem reasonable, would it be appropriate to use this model on future data if the

Using the small reproducible example below, I'd like to know if one can somehow use the matrix "sig" (defined below) to add a black outline (with lwd=2) to all pixels with a corresponding value of 1 in the matrix 'sig'? So for example, in the ggplot2 plot below, the pixel located at [1,3] would be outlined by a black square since the value at sig[1,3] == 1. This is my first

Dear R-tisans, I am trying to calculate the 12th root of a transition (square) matrix, but can't seem to obtain an accurate result. I realize that this post is laced with intimations of quantitative finance, but the question is both R-related and broadly mathematical. That said, I'm happy to post this to R-SIG-Finance if I've erred in posting this to the general list. I've

Hi Eric, you can use an annotate-layer, eg ind<-which(sig>0,arr.ind = T) ggplot(m1.melted, aes(x = Month, y = Site, fill = Concentration), autoscale = FALSE, zmin = -1 * zmax1, zmax = zmax1) + geom_tile() + coord_equal() + scale_fill_gradient2(low = "darkred", mid = "white", high = "darkblue",

Dear all, I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB of RAM. I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time Series" by Ruey Tsay. In R I'm using the fGarch library. After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model > model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse) I'm saving the results via > result<-model

Hi there, Does anyone know how to extract elements from the table returned by Manova()? Using the univariate equivalent, Anova(), it's easy: a.an<-Anova(lm(y~x1*x2)) a.an$F This will return a vector of the F-values in order of the terms of the model. However, a similar application using Manova(): m.an<-Manova(lm(Y~x1~x2)) m.an$F Returns NULL. So does any attempt at calling the

Hi, I encountered a weird problem when using the Design and Hmisc problem. I have 2 data frame called "a" and "b", both have 3 columns: "time", "status" and "scores", a sample of the data frame is like: data frame "a": time status scores 1 21 1 99.61 2 38 0 101.11 3 51 0 100.62 4 48 0 87.52 5 78 0

The "genetics" package for handling single-locus genetic data is now available on CRAN in both source and Windows binary formats. The purpose of this package is to make it easy to create and manipulate genetic information, and to facility use of this information in statistical models. The library includes classes and methods for creating, representing, and manipulating genotypes

The "genetics" package for handling single-locus genetic data is now available on CRAN in both source and Windows binary formats. The purpose of this package is to make it easy to create and manipulate genetic information, and to facility use of this information in statistical models. The library includes classes and methods for creating, representing, and manipulating genotypes

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

On 23.11.2012, at 15:12, john skaller <skaller at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > On 23/11/2012, at 5:46 PM, Sean Silva wrote: > >> Adding LLVMdev, since this is intimately related to the optimization passes. >> >>> I think this is roughly because some function level optimisations are >>> worse than O(N) in the number of instructions. >>

I've searched the Web with Google and do not find what might cause this particular error from an invocation of cenboxplot: cenboxplot(cu.t$quant, cu.t$ceneq1, cu.t$era, range=1.5, main='Total Recoverable Copper', ylab='Concentration (mg/L)', xlab='Time Period') Error in if (n > 0) (1L:n - a)/(n + 1 - 2 * a) else numeric() : argument is of length zero I do

Hi, I have been running the same code without problem for the last few days, changing data sets etc with no issue. Today I changed the covariates for the model and am now getting this error message: Error in `contrasts<-`(`*tmp*`, value = contr.funs[1 + isOF[nn]]) : contrasts can be applied only to factors with 2 or more levels Everything in the code looks the same to me, but I'm a

Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386 autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release build. llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release