Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "0.28s".
Did you mean:
0.28
2009 Sep 20
0
Re: reiserfs3/ext4/btrfs RAID read performance
On Sep 20, 11:50 am, wbrana@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Daniel J Blueman
>
> <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 19, 7:20 pm, wbr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> RAID details:
> >>
> >> md8 : active raid10 sda7[0] sdd7[3] sdc7[2] sdb7[1]
> >> 62925824 blocks 256K chunks 2 far-copies [4/4] [UUUU]
>
2010 Nov 01
3
btrfs benchmark with 2.6.37-rc1
Here is a small btrfs vs. ext4 benchmark with kernel 2.6.37-rc1.
compilebench with options -i 10 -r 30 on 2.6.37-rc1
btrfs
==========================================================================
intial create total runs 10 avg 73.11 MB/s (user 0.34s sys 1.96s)
create total runs 5 avg 49.53 MB/s (user 0.41s sys 1.62s)
patch total runs 4 avg 22.13 MB/s (user 0.09s sys 1.79s)
compile total runs
2003 Jan 10
1
Thread extension
Just figured I'd mention that CVS supports now THREAD extension. I also
did a bit of benchmarking using a folder with 4685 mails (evolution
mailing list):
dovecot+mbox:
- 0.59s user 0.01s system 98% cpu 0.608 total
- malloc() memory usage 45072 -> 825685
dovecot+maildir:
- 0.60s user 0.17s system 98% cpu 0.780 total
- malloc() memory usage: 45003 -> 825480
Meaning it takes almost