search for: 0.1671

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "0.1671".

Did you mean: 0.16.1
2011 Dec 01
3
Assign name to object for each iteration in a loop.
Hi R-users, I'm trying to produce decompositions of a multiple time-series, grouped by a factor (called "area"). I'm modifying the code in the STLperArea function of package ndvits, as this function only plots produces stl plots, it does not return the underlying data. I want to extract the trend component of each decomposition ("x$time.series[,trend]), assign a name
2007 Dec 07
1
paradox about the degree of freedom in a logistic regression model
Dear all: "predict.glm" provides an example to perform logistic regression when the response variable is a tow-columned matrix. I find some paradox about the degree of freedom . > summary(budworm.lg) Call: glm(formula = SF ~ sex * ldose, family = binomial) Deviance Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -1.39849 -0.32094 -0.07592 0.38220 1.10375
2011 Sep 28
0
PCA: prcomp rotations
Hi all, I think I may be confused by different people/programs using the word rotation differently. Does prcomp not perform rotations by default? If I understand it correctly retx=TRUE returns ordinated data, that I can plot for individual samples (prcomp()$x: which is the scaled and centered (rotated?) data multiplied by loadings). What does it mean that the data is rotated from the
2008 Jan 05
2
Behavior of ordered factors in glm
I have a variable which is roughly age categories in decades. In the original data, it came in coded: > str(xxx) 'data.frame': 58271 obs. of 29 variables: $ issuecat : Factor w/ 5 levels "0 - 39","40 - 49",..: 1 1 1 1... snip I then defined issuecat as ordered: > xxx$issuecat<-as.ordered(xxx$issuecat) When I include issuecat in a glm model, the result
2006 Jul 03
6
macro facility in R
R 2.2 on windows XP I have a dataset with multiple columns. Some of the columns represent independent variables, some represent dependent variables. I would like to run the same analyses on a fixed set of independent variables, changing only the dependent variable, e.g. y1-y2=x1+x2+x3 y3-y4=x1+x2+x3 y5-y6=x1+x2+x3, etc. I know I can write a function to perform the analyses, however in order to
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Target: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE on i386 autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: i386-unknown-freebsd6.2 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release build. llvm-gcc 4.2 from source.
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When