search for: 0.157

Hola Colegas: Me reintegro al estudio de R y quisiera me pudieran resolver el problema que planteo en el archivo adjunto. Gracias anticipadas. *MANOLO MÁRQUEZ P.* ------------ próxima parte ------------ Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20130511/b0c9f15d/attachment.html> ------------ próxima parte ------------ An embedded

I am trying to use t.test on the following data: date type INTERVAL nCASES MTF SDF MTO SDO nFST MF nOBS MO MB BIASCV BIASEV ME MAE RMSE CRCF 2001-06-15 avn GE1.00 4385 0.246 0.300 1.502 0.556 1367 1.373 4385 1.502 1.471 0.285 0.164 -1.256 1.266 1.399 0.056 2001-06-15 avn

Dear R users I have a big matrix like 6021 1188 790 290 1174 1015 1990 6613 6288 100714 6021 1 0.658 0.688 0.474 0.262 0.163 0.137 0.32 0.252 0.206 1188 0.658 1 0.917 0.245 0.331 0.122 0.148 0.194 0.168 0.171 790 0.688 0.917 1 0.243 0.31 0.122 0.15 0.19 0.171 0.174 290 0.474

Dear all, I have a question concerning the p-value. When running coxph I get a p-value = 0. :confused: Can this be true? Why aren?t there decimal points? Is there a way to find out the exact p-value? Here is the output: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Call: coxph(formula = Surv(start, stop, status) ~ Albumin_gproL, data = dial,

Hi, Profiling shows that 65-70% of the time of my program is spent inside a single function -- this is not surprising, as it is inside an optimize call inside a loop (this is a dynamic programming problem). I would like to speed this up. The function does very little: has a single argument, evaluates a spline at that argument, does some simple arithmetic with it (adding constants,

Hello, I need some results from the survival analysis of my data that I do not know whether exist in Survival Package or how to obtain if they do: 1. The Mean survival time 2. The standard error of the mean 3. Point and 95% Lower & Upper Confidence Intervals estimates Any help will be greatly appreciated. Cem [[alternative HTML version

Hi, I've come across a strange error when using the lrm.fit function and the subsequent predict function. The model is created very quickly and can be verified by printing it on the console. Everything looks good. (In fact, the performance measures are rather nice.) Then, I want to use the model to predict some values. I get the following error: "fit was not created by a Design

Dear R forum, (Pl note this is not a finance problem) I have two data.frames as currency_df = data.frame(current_date = c("3/4/2013", "3/4/2013", "3/4/2013", "3/4/2013"), issue_date = c("27/11/2012", "9/12/2012", "14/01/2013", "28/02/2013"), maturity_date = c("27/04/2013", "3/5/2013",

Odd behaviour of function cor() in R-2.10.1-64bit-Unix In a dataset with 1366 patients and 244 clinical variables Spearman's Rho was calculated for some fatty acids and BMI and came over something rather odd: R seems to calculate Rho differently on 2.10.1-64bit-Unix and 2.9.0-32bit-Windows when I calculate the complete (244x244) correlation matrix and then pick out the values I am

Dear R community members, I think I am asking a very simple question, but I really looked up in the faqs and manuals and found nothing helpful. I am trying to plot a data frame with the following structure (this is just a small extract): glo conc odor line series X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 1 0 AIR LN1 UP -0.488

Dear all, The 'make check' step fails for the pacakge mva on IBM AIX. The tail of the Rout log file looks like: > for(factors in 2:4) print(update(Harman23.FA, factors = factors)) Call: factanal(factors = factors, covmat = Harman23.cor) Uniquenesses: height arm.span forearm lower.leg weight 0.170 0.107 0.166

On 03/19/2013 11:02 AM, Star Tan wrote: > > Dear Tobias Grosser, > > Today I have rebuilt the LLVM-Polly in Release mode. The configuration of my own testing machine is: Intel Pentium Dual CPU T2390(1.86GHz) with 2GB DDR2 memory. > I evaluated the Polly using PolyBench and Mediabench. It takes too long time to evaluate the whole LLVM-testsuite, so I just choose the Mediabench from

Dear Tobias Grosser, Today I have rebuilt the LLVM-Polly in Release mode. The configuration of my own testing machine is: Intel Pentium Dual CPU T2390(1.86GHz) with 2GB DDR2 memory. I evaluated the Polly using PolyBench and Mediabench. It takes too long time to evaluate the whole LLVM-testsuite, so I just choose the Mediabench from LLVM-testsuite. The preliminary results of Polly compiling

Hi, I got two data point vectors. Now I want to make a ks.test(). I you print both vectors you will see, that they fit pretty fine. Here is a picture: http://www.jochen-bauer.net/downloads/kstest-r-help-list-plot.png As you can see there is one histogram and moreover there is the gumbel density function plotted. Now I took to bin-mids and the bin-height for vector1 and computed the

Hi there, I am doing multiple comparisons for data that is not normally distributed. For this purpose I tried both functions kruskal{agricolae} and kruskalmc{pgirmess}. It confuses me that these functions do not yield the same results although they are doing the same thing, don't they? Can anyone tell my why this happens and which function I can trust? kruskalmc() tells me that there are no

I try to get working together vlan and bonding both for dom0 and domU. I lost packets sent to dom0 while domU is OK. Nightly stats for dom0: 52879 packets transmitted, 45293 received, 14% packet loss, time 52879599ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.144/0.224/717.306/5.129 ms Nightly stats for domU: 52952 packets transmitted, 52952 received, 0% packet loss, time 52952554ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev =

I currently work on a draft of an aquatic bioassessment. The conditions tested are the following: ER river water T dechlorinated water control 0.5 + 0.5mg / L of malate T + 1 dechlorinated water control + 1g / L of malate T ED dechlorinated water control SED + ER + river water sediment SED ED + sediment + water dechlorinated. It is the result of AChE in muscle (fillet of fish). The production of

Dear all,I am a new user of WinBUGS and need your help. After running the following code, I got parameters of beta0 through beta4 (stats, density), but I don't know how to get the prediction of the last value of h, the variable I set to NA and want to model it using the following code.Does anyone can given me a hint? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.Best

Dear Tobias Grosser, Thank you so much for your kind reply. Your advice is very helpful and inspiring. At 2013-03-18 20:40:50,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 03/17/2013 11:54 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hello Tobi, >> >> I am interested in Polly project. Polly seems to be a very promising tool to find out program parallelization based on LLVM

Dear R-helpers, this mail is intended to mention a rather trange result and generate potential useful comments on it. I am not aware of another posts on this issue ( RSiteSearch("quasipoisson lmer version dispersion")). MUsing the exemple in the reference of the lmer function (in lme4 library) and turning it into a quasi-poisson or quasi-binomial analysis, we get different results,