search for: 0.146

klibc now runs on the CRIS archtitecture. The patch below is against 0.146. Most of the changes are trivial but the new files in libgcc requires some comments. __negdi2.c: The CRIS port fallbacks to C-code for negdi2. The code in __negdi2.c is copied from libgcc2.c but with modified typenames. I would really appreciate if someone could check if it seams sane. crisarith.c: CRIS has no built-in

Hi all: I finished cox analysis like this: fit_cox<-coxph(Surv(dat$Time, dat$death) ~ dat$CD4 + strata(dat$gender),data=dat); > fit_cox Call: coxph(formula = Surv(data_ori$Time, data_ori$death) ~ data_ori$drug + strata(data_ori$gender), data = data_ori) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p data_ori$drugddI 0.216 1.24 0.146 1.47 0.14 Likelihood ratio test=2.17 on

Hi all, I'm a beginner user of R. I am stuck at what I thought was a very obvious problem, but surprisingly, I havent found any solution on the forum or online till now. My problem is simple. I have a file which has entries like the following: #ID Value1 List_of_values ID1 0.342 0.01,1.2,0,0.323,0.67 ID2 0.010 0.987,0.056,1.3,1.5,0.4

Hi r-users,   I would like to extract the data that match.  Attached is my data: I'm interested in matchind the value in column 'intg' with value in column 'rand_no' > cbind(z=z,intg=dd,rand_no = rr)             z  intg rand_no    [1,]  0.00 0.000   0.001    [2,]  0.01 0.000   0.002    [3,]  0.02 0.000   0.002    [4,]  0.03 0.000   0.003    [5,]  0.04 0.000   0.003    [6,] 

I am trying to specify a mixed model for my research, but I can't quite get it to work. I've spent several weeks looking thru various online sources to no avail. I can't find an example of someone trying to do precisely what I'm trying to do. I'm hoping some smart member of this mailing list may be able to help. First off, full disclosure: (1) I'm an engineer by trade, so

Hi, Am I interpreting the results properly? Are my conclusions correct? > KPSS.test(df) ---- ---- KPSS test ---- ---- Null hypotheses: Level stationarity and stationarity around a linear trend. Alternative hypothesis: Unit root. ---- Statistic for the null hypothesis of level stationarity: 1.089 Critical values: 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.347 0.463

Hi, How can I access the Values stored in kpssstat-class given by KPSS.test function and store it in a variable. For example: >x <- rnorm(1000) >test <- KPSS.test(ts(x)) >test ---- ---- KPSS test ---- ---- Null hypotheses: Level stationarity and stationarity around a linear trend. Alternative hypothesis: Unit root. ---- Statistic for the null

Dear all, I have an annual time-series of population numbers and I would like to estimate the auto-correlation. Can I use acf() function and judge whether auto-correlation is significant by the plots? The acf array, eg: Autocorrelations of series 'x$log.s.r', by lag 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1.000 0.031 -0.171

Hi, people. A tiny suggestion for the system.time function. Could the returned vector have names? These could be like: c("User", "System", "Elapsed", "Sub.User", "Sub.System") That would then produce self-documenting output. -- Fran?ois Pinard http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca

I'd echo a lot of what has been said about this by the folk who have been making R work so well. One of the main difficulties is that the environment of computations affects relative performance. e.g., what settings did a distro package builder choose. I note that my 3 GHz Dual Core machine running Ubuntu 8.04 gets octave 3.0.0 octave:6> tic; a = a + 1; toc Elapsed time is 0.120027

I am trying to understand what is the difference between linear and polynomial kernel: linear: u'*v polynomial: (gamma*u'*v + coef0)^degree It would seem that polynomial kernel with gamma = 1; coef0 = 0 and degree = 1 should be identical to linear kernel, however it gives me significantly different results for very simple data set, with linear kernel

Hi, In my analysis of impacts of insecticide-treated bednets on malaria, I look at the relationship between malaria incidence and mosquito behaviors. The condensed data set is copied here. Ordinary regression (lm) shows that Incidence was negatively related to Mortality. This makes sense because the latter reflected the strength of killing mosquitoes by insecticide-treated nets. Since the

I suspect the weights argument is not having any effect. Package: Matrix Version: 0.995-2 Date: 2006-01-19 Beginning with this: Browse[1]> resp.lmer <- lmer(SensSSC ~ Block + Season + (1 | Plot) + (1 | Ma) + (1 | Pa) + + (1 | MaPa), weights = SensSSC.N, data = xx) I group the output into a table with my ran.eff function and get this:

Hi: I am using a subset of the below dataset to predict PRED_SUIT for the whole dataset but I am having trouble with 'newdata'. The model was created with 153 records and want to predict for 208 records. wolf2 <- structure(list(gridcell = c(367L, 444L, 533L, 587L, 598L, 609L, 620L, 629L, 641L, 651L, 662L, 674L, 684L, 695L, 738L, 748L, 804L, 805L, 872L, 919L, 929L, 938L, 950L, 958L,

Hi all, I'm using R 2.0.1. for Windows to analyze the influence of following factors on response Y: A (four levels) B (three levels) C (two levels) D (29 levels) with E (four replicates) The dataset looks like this: A B C D E Y 0 1 1 1 1 491.9 0 1 1 1 2 618.7 0 1 1 1 3 448.2 0 1 1 1 4 632.9 250 1 1 1 1 92.4 250 1 1 1 2 117 250 1 1 1 3 35.5 250 1 1 1 4 102.7 500 1 1 1 1 47 500 1 1 1 2 57.4

Hi, I have run into another problem using offsets, this time with the predict function, where there seems to be a contradiction again between the behavior and the help page. On the man page for predict.lm, it says Offsets specified by offset in the fit by lm will not be included in predictions, whereas those specified by an offset term in the formula will be. While it indicates nothings about

I currently work on a draft of an aquatic bioassessment. The conditions tested are the following: ER river water T dechlorinated water control 0.5 + 0.5mg / L of malate T + 1 dechlorinated water control + 1g / L of malate T ED dechlorinated water control SED + ER + river water sediment SED ED + sediment + water dechlorinated. It is the result of AChE in muscle (fillet of fish). The production of

I am trying to use t.test on the following data: date type INTERVAL nCASES MTF SDF MTO SDO nFST MF nOBS MO MB BIASCV BIASEV ME MAE RMSE CRCF 2001-06-15 avn GE1.00 4385 0.246 0.300 1.502 0.556 1367 1.373 4385 1.502 1.471 0.285 0.164 -1.256 1.266 1.399 0.056 2001-06-15 avn

Hi folks, Warning: I don't know if the result I am getting makes sense, so this may be a statistics question. The fitted values from my binomial lmer mixed model seem to consistently overestimate the cell means, and I don't know why. I assume I am doing something stupid. Below I include code, and a binary image of the data is available at this link:

Dear R gurus I am running a GLMM that looks at whether chimpanzees spend time in shade more than sun (response variable 'y': used cbind() on counts in the sun and shade) based on the time of day (Time) and the availability of shade (Tertile). I've included some random factors too which are the chimpanzee in question (Individual) and where they are in a given area (Zone). There are