search for: 0.1.12

Hi Guys, Am a Linux newbie and need some help setting up this UPS with NUT on Cent OS 5.6. So basically I have the following packages installed with yum: libusb-devel-0.1.12-5.1.x86_64 libusb-devel-0.1.12-5.1.i386 libusb-0.1.12-5.1.x86_64 libusb-0.1.12-5.1.i386 nut-2.2.2-1.el5.x86_64 When I run service ups start I get the following: Starting UPS driver controller:

On Sep 21, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Rob Groner <rgroner at RTD.com> wrote: > > I didn't think to look for a log (attached), but now looking in it, I don't see anything more than I already thought I knew. It's as cryptic as configure itself. > > It does reference the line in the configure where the test for USB failed, but I'd already been looking in there. I

On Sep 15, 2015, at 9:31 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Trying to track down the source of the problem, I checked Yast to make sure I had at least 0.1.8 version for libusb. I saw this (attached photo). Is it then actually using ?compat instead of the ?real? libusb? And is that a problem? > > You're right, both the -compat and real libusb

Trying to install Canon printer driver package (rpm), I get a dependency error: libusb-1.0.so.0 is needed.... The version currently installed on my 5.9 system is libusb-0.1.12-6.el5 and, AFAIK (per yum), no upgrade to that is available. So question: Do higher centos versions have libusb-1.0.so ? (We could perform a quick inventory with: uname -r; rpm -q libusb Thanks.

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 07:22:01PM -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote: > On 12/14/14 07:29, ken wrote: > > uname -r; rpm -q libusb > > CentOS 6.6 says: > [mlapier at mushroom ~]$ uname -r; rpm -q libusb > 2.6.32-504.1.3.el6.i686 > libusb-0.1.12-23.el6.i686 CentOS 5 has: libusb-0.1.12 CentOS 6 has: libusb-0.1.12 libusb1-1.0.9 CentOS 7 has: libusb-0.1.4 libusbx-1.0.15

Rob - Just stepping in from the sidelines . . . with a few tidbits. Nut uses pkgconfig to find and identify stuff as part of it's build . . . So, depending on where your libusb install went, if it wasn't in the default "PKG_CONFIG_PATH" setting, it won't be found. Much like other shell variables, you can adjust that setting to find anything you like . . . IE

I have already reported this as a bug to the HP folks, but I was hoping someone here might have a clue about this one. Just bought an HP Deskjet F2120 and tried to install it on my CentOS 5.064-bit system. The printer installed fine, but sane does not recognize the device, so I tried to install hplip 2.7.10, which is supposed to support it. Installation failed twice - first time because I did

Hi, I know I've brought this up before (see http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot at dovecot.org/msg20974.html), and I've since upgraded to 1.2.6, but our vacation messages are still being rejected because of Bad_MIME. We are using Dovecot Sieve 0.1.12, the auto reply message contains ^M characters at the end of a few lines, they are only visable through vi, example: Received: from

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1498 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1498.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 7d2661ef76a592b0742f34abc20ba700 libusb-0.1.12-6.el5.i386.rpm 565c12782b350526c032d83e362f06b5 libusb-0.1.12-6.el5.x86_64.rpm 6c35a97adc73c5b361b3f56a2c582a45

For fun, if you want to see where the system thinks it is linking a library from, you can use "ldconfig -p" and it will give you a path to all known libraries that it can find. If you have one loaded, and it can't find it (odd directory, etc.) you can always amend "LD_LIBRARY_PATH" the same way as PKG_CONFIG_PATH I mentioned earlier . . . . PKG . . . is for the build

Thanks Charles, you were right about that. Here is what I tried...I installed openSUSE 13.1 from scratch (which means no libusb). I then took libusb-1.0 from the sourceforge site and built and installed it. Still it got the "cannot find libusb" error. So, looking at the sourceforge site, is see it mention that to work with the older libusb-0.1, you had to use libusb-compat-0.1.5.

Well, I've spent a couple hours on this, unable to figure it out. I removed the libusb-compat-devel package using zypper. And I've downloaded, built, and installed libusb from sourceforge. But trying to configure nut now I get "USB drivers requested, but libusb not found", no matter what I put for --with-usb-libs. Continuing to flog away at it... Rob Groner Software

Tim, Thanks for the help! No, I didn't already know that... I swear, the more time I spend at this, the less I seem to be understanding. I know that it had to be finding the libusb-compat I had just installed, because configure hadn't worked before that, and now it did. But finding useful version information seems to be almost impossible. Rob Groner Software Engineer Level II RTD

So far, the systemd service unit is working perfectly. Halleluia! For reference, here are the libs associated with the usbhid-ups driver: rtd at linux-fnda:/etc/init.d> ldd /usr/local/ups/bin/usbhid-ups linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fffecd25000) libusb-0.1.so.4 => /usr/lib64/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0x00007ff3b841b000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0

I'm trying to get hplip-2.7.12 installed, and I'm reasonably sure that I had it installed on this box before my problems last month. Anyway, it will not build at the moment. It stops the Configure with "configure: error: "cannot find libjpeg support". However, Package libjpeg - 6b-37.i386 is already installed. Similarly, attempting to install hplip-3.9.2 stops with

Hello again all. I am trying to use USB functions (non-HID) and I get a linker error for functions that are in the included usb-common.h file. Specifically, at the start, these functions: - warn_if_bad_usb_port_filename - nutusb_open - is_usb_device_supported Clearly the headers are there or I don't think the driver would compile. Can someone point me in the right direction please? Thank

Hi, yesterday I upgraded a centos 4.6 box via yum and now it seems that certain pages, especially swf files stopped working. Does anyone know if ImageMagick got broken on x64? I don't see any other package wich could have caused this problem. kind regards, Geert PS Below is the output of my yum update May 05 13:20:25 Updated: cups-libs.x86_64 1:1.1.22-0.rc1.9.20.2.el4_6.6 May 05

On Sep 22, 2015, at 3:47 PM, Rob Groner <rgroner at RTD.com> wrote: > So, here is what I think I know: > > NUT is using the libusb-1.0.20 library, by way of the libusb-compat layer. When I check the configure log, it says "libusb-0.1.12" I'm not sure why it says that, as in where it gets that value, as that version doesn't correspond to anything I installed. I

Thanks again Tim. I installed openSUSE from scratch, without installing libusb anything. I tried configure, and it failed because it couldn't find libusb. I used ldconfig to see what the system could see. It found 3 entries with "libusb" in them. I then built and installed the last update of libusb-0.1 (not libusb-compat or libusb-1.0). I tried configure, and it ran without

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1498 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1498.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 7d2661ef76a592b0742f34abc20ba700 libusb-0.1.12-6.el5.i386.rpm 6c35a97adc73c5b361b3f56a2c582a45 libusb-devel-0.1.12-6.el5.i386.rpm Source: