search for: 0.0764

Hi there, Everytime when I paste My R output in WORD, the columns couldn't line up nicely like they appear in R console. Is there a way to fix this problem? Thanks for any help! time n.risk n.event survival std.err lower 95% CI upper 95% CI 6 21 3 0.857 0.0764 0.707 1.000 7 17 1 0.807 0.0869 0.636 0.977 10 15 1

Hi All, I am trying to reproduce this using R instead. [image: Full-size image (38 K)] I tried using the following code *SChla <- read.csv("SM_Chla_data.csv")* *Atlantis <- SChla[16:66,]* *head(Atlantis)* * * Seamount Station Depth Pico Nano Micro Total_Ch dbar Latitude Longitud 16 Atlantis 1217 Surface 0.0639 0.1560 0.0398 0.2597 2.082 -32.71450 57.29733

I wantto run sequential ANOVAs (i.e. type I sums of squares), and trying to getresults including ANOVA tables and associated coefficients for predictive variables(I am using the R 3.4.2 version). I think ANOVA tables look right, but believecoefficients are wrong. Specifically, it looks like that the coefficients arefrom ANOVA with ?marginal? (type III sums of squares). I have tried both lme

I am getting the following errors when I am trying to plot the data below. I cannot figure out the error. Error in plot.window(...) : need finite 'xlim' values In addition: Warning messages: 1: In min(x) : no non-missing arguments to min; returning Inf 2: In max(x) : no non-missing arguments to max; returning -Inf 3: In min(x) : no non-missing arguments to min; returning Inf 4: In max(x) :

Hi there, I'm trying to solve 2 nonlinear equations in 2 unknowns using the BB package. The first part of my program solves 3 ODEs using the deSolve package. This part works. The output is used as parameter values in the functions I need to solve. The second part is to solve 2 equations in 2 unknowns. This does not work. I get the error message "unexpected end of input". So what

Hello All, I have posted to this list before regarding the same issue so I apologize for the multiple e-mails. I am still struggling with this issue so I thought I'd give it another try. This time I have included reproducible code and a subset of the data I am analyzing. I am running an ANOVA with three factors: GROUP (5 levels), FEATURE (2 levels), and PATIENT (2 levels), where

Dear All, I have been struggling to understand why for the housing data in MASS library R and stata give coef. estimates that are really different. I also tried to come up with many many examples myself (see below, of course I did not have the set.seed command included) and all of my `random' examples seem to give verry similar output. For the housing data, I have changed the data into numeric

Dear All, Comparing linear mixed effect models in SAS and R, I found the following discrepancy: SAS R random statement random subj(program); random = ~ 1 | Subj -2*loglik 1420.8 1439.363 random effects variance(Intercept) 9.6033 9.604662

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

Hi All, This question was brought up some time ago but I never saw a reply so I'd like to bring it up again. When using ROracle package (version 0.5-5), I am unable to run any queries that are greater than 4000 characters in length. If I do, I get the following message: Error in oraPrepareStatement(con, statement, bind=NULL) : RS-DBI driver: (too long a statement -- it must has less than

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download