Displaying 20 results from an estimated 54 matches for "0.057".
Did you mean:
0.05
2010 Feb 04
2
help needed using t.test with factors
I am trying to use t.test on the following data:
date type INTERVAL nCASES MTF SDF MTO SDO
nFST MF nOBS MO MB BIASCV BIASEV ME MAE
RMSE CRCF
2001-06-15 avn GE1.00 4385 0.246 0.300 1.502
0.556 1367 1.373 4385 1.502 1.471 0.285 0.164
-1.256 1.266 1.399 0.056
2001-06-15 avn
2010 Mar 12
1
simple plot in ggplot2, wrong error bars
I was wondering if anyone could help me with this, simple problem.
I am essentially following the example on Hadley's webpage
(http://had.co.nz/ggplot2/geom_errorbar.html), but it still doesn't make any
sense to me.
df <- data.frame(trt = factor(c("intact", "intact", "removed", "removed")),
coon = c(0.093, 0.06, 0.057, 0.09), group =
2008 Mar 08
1
ask for help on nonlinear fitting
I have a table like the following. I want to fit Cm to Vm like this:
Cm ~ Cl+Q1*b1*38.67*exp(-b1*(Vm-Vp1)*0.03867)/(1+exp(-b1*(Vm-Vp1)*0.03867))^2+Q2*b2*38.67*exp(-b2*(Vm-Vp2)*0.03867)/(1+exp(-b2*(Vm-Vp2)*0.03867))^2
I use nls, with start=list(Q1=2e-3, b1=1, Vp1=-25, Q2=3e-3, b2=1,
Vp2=200). But I always get 'singlular gradient' error like this. But
in SigmaPlot I can get the result. How
2012 Aug 03
1
Multiple Comparisons-Kruskal-Wallis-Test: kruskal{agricolae} and kruskalmc{pgirmess} don't yield the same results although they should do (?)
Hi there,
I am doing multiple comparisons for data that is not normally distributed.
For this purpose I tried both functions kruskal{agricolae} and
kruskalmc{pgirmess}. It confuses me that these functions do not yield the
same results although they are doing the same thing, don't they? Can anyone
tell my why this happens and which function I can trust?
kruskalmc() tells me that there are no
2019 Jul 30
1
[PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:54:53AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > This series tries to increase the throughput of virtio-vsock with slight
> > changes.
> > While I was testing the v2 of this series I discovered an huge use of memory,
> > so I added patch 1 to mitigate this issue. I put it in this
2018 Mar 20
0
Struggling to compute marginal effects !
In that case, I can't work out why the first model fails but not the
second. I would start looking at "Data" to see what it contains. if:
object2 <- polr(Inc ~ Training ,Data,Hess = T,method = "logistic" )
works, the problem may be with the "Adopt" variable.
Jim
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Willy Byamungu
<wmulimbi at email.uark.edu> wrote:
>
2007 Jun 13
2
Formatted Data File Question for Clustering -Quickie Project
I am trying to learn how to format Ascii data files for scan or read
into R.
Precisely for a quickie project, I found some code (at end of this
email) to do exactly what I need:
To cluster and graph a dendrogram from package (stats).
I am stuck on how to format a text file to run the script.
I looked at the dataset USArrests (which would be replaced by my data
and labels) using UltraEdit. That
2008 May 29
2
In fact this is a Stats question, but...
Dear All,
I'me having (much) trouble understanding why it happened and answering
a referee's comment to part of a submitted manuscript. I've tried to
google for help but... I'm really confident that although this is a
R-Help list someone can help me!
I used R to do an ANCOVA w/ RNA/DNA as the dep var, sl as the indep
var and gut (a factor w/ levels: prey and empty) as the
2009 Dec 07
0
A Gamma-GLM with log link
Hi,
I have a set of data (total number of record = 144,122), and I would like to
use gamma-glm with log link to set up a model.
IC is number of records
IL is paid amount
The table below shows that I have
30.578% of the data in the level of "1 - 1000" paid amount
20.320% of the data in the level of "1001 - 2000" paid amount
and so on
My question is could i use the whole data
2008 Apr 11
1
Vegan dataframe not acting nicely
This is what my data looks like
DOC TOC TKN
RM119mFeb-06 1 2 3
RM61mFeb-06 2 4 6
I have this both in a .csv and .txt I have read this in with
read.csv("chemodr.csv", header=T)
and this is what I get
X dAmon DN.N Nitrite.N DOC OP P TKN TOC
1 RM215mFeb-06 0.000 0.1300 0.0000 2.5
2005 Aug 20
1
glmmPQL and Convergence
I fit the following model using glmmPQL from MASS:
fit.glmmPQL <-
glmmPQL(ifelse(class=="Disease",1,0)~age+x1+x2,random=~1|subject,family=binomial)
summary(fit.glmmPQL)
The response is paired (pairing denoted by subject), although some
subjects only have one response. Also, there is a perfect positive
correlation between the paired responses. x1 and x2 can and do differ
within each
2010 Feb 17
2
extract the data that match
Hi r-users,
I would like to extract the data that match. Attached is my data:
I'm interested in matchind the value in column 'intg' with value in column 'rand_no'
> cbind(z=z,intg=dd,rand_no = rr)
z intg rand_no
[1,] 0.00 0.000 0.001
[2,] 0.01 0.000 0.002
[3,] 0.02 0.000 0.002
[4,] 0.03 0.000 0.003
[5,] 0.04 0.000 0.003
[6,]
2010 Jan 06
0
Unconsistent behaviour of function cor()
Odd behaviour of function cor() in R-2.10.1-64bit-Unix
In a dataset with 1366 patients and 244 clinical variables Spearman's Rho
was calculated for some fatty acids and BMI and came over something rather
odd:
R seems to calculate Rho differently on 2.10.1-64bit-Unix and
2.9.0-32bit-Windows when I calculate the complete (244x244) correlation
matrix and then pick out the values I am
2005 Jan 30
1
x86_64 timer resolution in ping results
Hi,
There seems to be a problem with the timer resolution on x86_64. This is
clear in ping results - I don't know if it's just a ping problem or if
it manifests elsewhere as well. It does also affect mtr and traceroute
times.
I guess it's more a kernel issue than a CentOS problem, but is anyone
else seeing the same?
Ping results have a resolution of 10ms - so a ping <10ms
2019 Jul 29
0
[PATCH v4 0/5] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 01:30:25PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> This series tries to increase the throughput of virtio-vsock with slight
> changes.
> While I was testing the v2 of this series I discovered an huge use of memory,
> so I added patch 1 to mitigate this issue. I put it in this series in order
> to better track the performance trends.
Series:
Acked-by: Michael S.
2019 Jul 30
0
[PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> This series tries to increase the throughput of virtio-vsock with slight
> changes.
> While I was testing the v2 of this series I discovered an huge use of memory,
> so I added patch 1 to mitigate this issue. I put it in this series in order
> to better track the performance trends.
>
> v5:
> - rebased
2019 Jul 30
7
[PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput
This series tries to increase the throughput of virtio-vsock with slight
changes.
While I was testing the v2 of this series I discovered an huge use of memory,
so I added patch 1 to mitigate this issue. I put it in this series in order
to better track the performance trends.
v5:
- rebased all patches on net-next
- added Stefan's R-b and Michael's A-b
v4:
2019 Jul 30
7
[PATCH net-next v5 0/5] vsock/virtio: optimizations to increase the throughput
This series tries to increase the throughput of virtio-vsock with slight
changes.
While I was testing the v2 of this series I discovered an huge use of memory,
so I added patch 1 to mitigate this issue. I put it in this series in order
to better track the performance trends.
v5:
- rebased all patches on net-next
- added Stefan's R-b and Michael's A-b
v4:
2018 May 15
2
Systemfit
OK, Let's try this again! Here is the reproducible script; it is long because I had to copy the panel dataset here. My question is related to systemfit; I don't know how to get the result for the entire panel.
#Reproducible script
Empdata<- read.csv("/Users/ngwinuiazenui/Documents/UPLOADemp.csv")
View(Empdata)
install.packages("systemfit")
2005 May 10
2
predict nlme syntax
Dear all
Please help me with correct syntax of predict.nlme.
I would like to predict from nlme object for new data.
I used predict(fit.nlme6, data=newdata) but I have always got
fitted values, no matter how I changed newdata.
I have
> summary(fit.nlme6)
Nonlinear mixed-effects model fit by maximum likelihood
Model: konverze ~ SSfpl(tepl, A, B, xmid, scal)
Data: limity.gr
AIC