Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "0.03708".
Did you mean:
0.0370
2010 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] MmapAllocator
Hi Steven-
Nice, but will this not break Windows? From an initial glance over your patch, it seems to assume the existence of mmap() in some form or other.
Alistair
On 8 Aug 2010, at 03:05, Steven Noonan wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been doing work on memory reduction in Unladen Swallow, and
> during testing, LiveRanges seemed to be consuming one of the largest
> chunks of
2010 Aug 08
4
[LLVMdev] MmapAllocator
Hi folks,
I've been doing work on memory reduction in Unladen Swallow, and
during testing, LiveRanges seemed to be consuming one of the largest
chunks of memory. I wrote a replacement allocator for use by
BumpPtrAllocator which uses mmap()/munmap() in place of
malloc()/free(). It has worked flawlessly in testing, and reduces
memory usage quite nicely in Unladen Swallow.
The code is available